Friendship/729 F-1

Speed and control ratings I’ve given are arbitrary. The only other blade I tried is a Clipper WRB wood, so I can’t really compare much. I bought the F1 (from Eacheng) because of the straight handle and good price for a carbon blade. It’s easier than the clipper for short games due to it being thinner. Also, with the same rubbers on each blade, the F1 is less head-heavy, so I find it easier to put a lot of wrist flick into shots and faster arm speed on flips and over-table smashes. Getting a second one soon as a spare, so will edit to say if they are the same or any differences between them. No problems so far with splintering when changing rubbers, and pretty tough if hit by the table accidentally. The clipper gets damaged much more easily. No problems with it absorbing glue, as other reviews state. And can’t see how it will change characteristics over time. Slow/fast loops, blocking, serving all good.

This blade is an intriguing 7-ply composite that plays like an all-wood blade. The ball impact sensation is pleasant and accurate.

Measuring less than 6mm thick, the blade offers flexibility that enhances speed and spin on powerful shots and loops. I paired the blade with Donic Barracuda on the forehand and Hexer Duro on the backhand. This setup encourages topspin play.

Despite my limited skills, I sense that this blade has much more potential. It’s a shame that I’m not Wang LiQin!

Speed is probably higher than I rated because I paired it with slow tacky rubbers. Due to the thickness of the outer wood layers, it feels and sounds more like a wooden blade rather than a carbon blade. It excels at starting the initial loop in a rally.

Pros:

In a manner of speaking, this blade offers good value for money. It plays similarly to Viscaria Light and evokes memories of the dependable Sardius. As a budget-friendly replica, it excels in looping performance. However, it’s crucial to manage expectations as it remains a budget blade with corresponding limitations. It delivers a decent punch and boasts a pleasant feel.

Cons:

The craftsmanship and material quality are notably poor. Sanding and varnishing are necessary to refine the blade, as it splinters easily and absorbs glue excessively. After a testing period of two weeks, I discovered that its performance is inconsistent and subject to change over time. This variability undermines its reliability for consistent gameplay.

Review text:

I found a review here: http://mytabletennis.net/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=39284&PN=1.