DHS Tin Arc 3

Rubber description:

DHS Tin Arc 3 is a remarkable table tennis rubber that intricately balances speed, spin, and control, making it a popular choice among both novice and experienced players. The rubber features a semi-tacky topsheet that allows for impressive spin generation while maintaining sufficient control during aggressive gameplay. Its performance is particularly notable for looping techniques, where players can effortlessly generate heavy topspin, enabling successful third-ball attacks and precise service spins.

When it comes to tackiness, the Tin Arc 3 scores a 4.2 out of 10, indicating a moderate level of grip that provides just enough bite without being overly spin-sensitive. This characteristic makes it easier to handle high-spin serves, allowing players to return them effectively. In terms of weight, it tends to be on the heavier side, rated at 6.2, which can be a consideration for players seeking a lighter setup. Some users have noted that this added weight can be cumbersome over extended play sessions, but many appreciate the stability and control it offers.

Regarding durability, the DHS Tin Arc 3 stands out with a score of 7.4, providing a good lifespan compared to other rubbers in its category. Players have expressed satisfaction with its consistency and longevity, making it a reliable choice for regular competitions. For those considering alternatives, rubbers like Tenergy 05 and Yasaka Rakza 7 have been compared to the Tin Arc 3, with similar qualities in terms of spin and control, though they come with different weight profiles and price points. Overall, the DHS Tin Arc 3 is an excellent rubber that enhances gameplay, particularly for aggressive, spin-oriented styles.

Recent Reviews

#1 — August 2021

Review of Table Tennis Rubber

Pros:

Best rubber for current level
Less dense sponge than Goldarc 8
Spin and speed depend on technique and strength
Low trajectory, great spin, and controllable speed
Great blocking control
Improved looping for underspin

Cons:

Not tacky
Heavier than Yasaka rubbers

Specific Observations:

For close-up topspins, overshooting the table may occur with flat hits
In comparison to Yasaka Razka 7:
- Razka 7 is better for blocking and less sensitive to spin and touch
- Razka 7 is more suitable for flat hitting, while TA3 is better for under-spin lifting
Razka 7 provides similar quality for lifts and flicks, with a minor difference in performance

Overall Recommendation:

Recommended for players seeking a rubber that maintains pace from medium to far from the table.

#2 — April 2021

Speed: 8
Spin: 9
Hardness: Medium

This rubber provides good control.

However, on the first day of use, the rubber is hard. By the third day, it softens down to a medium hardness.

#3 — June 2020

Right now I use this TA3 on my backhand. H 35, 2.0mm and black. I’m coming from using DHS Hurricane 8, H 39, 2.15mm, black. These rubbers are very different. The TA3 is much less spin sensitive, so it’s a lot easier to return high spin serves and brush loops. It’s very soft, so it’s quite slow compared to the H8 (even if the H8 is a bit slow as well). TA3 doesn’t “go” by itself. You’ll have to work it good and make the full strokes to get the most out of it, otherwise the ball often goes in the net. Perhaps this is mainly the H 35 sponge being to slow and not so forgiving.

On the other side, it’s easy to block loops and place them well, and the pushing and short game is much easier to handle.

Now I’ve only played about 10 hours with my new setup, and if I have another feel in the future, I will change my review.

Blade: Friendship 729 L3 FL
FH: DHS Skyline TG2 NEO, H 39, 2.15mm
BH: DHS TinArc 3, H 35, 2.0mm

Update: Now I have tried the TA3 2.1mm H37 Red on my 729 V-6 blade. It gives me a better feeling in my backhand. You don’t have to put so much effort in your strikes to get the ball over the net. When I put it on forehand and test some brush loops, the feeling is good, but the ball always comes back. The spin and catapult effect isn’t anything like Skyline/Hurricane NEO rubbers, so I will keep it on my backhand. Weight cut 2.1mm H37: 48-51g. 2.0mm H35: 46g.