Nittaku Fastarc P-1

Rubber description:

The Nittaku Fastarc P-1 is an advanced table tennis rubber designed primarily for players seeking speed and spin, particularly suited for the modern 40+ plastic ball. It boasts impressive ratings, with speed and spin both scoring 98, indicating its potent ability to accelerate the ball and generate hefty rotation. The Fastarc P-1 features a hardness rating of 47.5 degrees, yet many players describe its feel as surprisingly soft, allowing for effective ball absorption upon contact. This rubber’s unique composition enables it to deliver a linear and controlled response, making it an excellent choice for skilled counter-looping and aggressive play styles.

In terms of tackiness, the P-1 has a moderate rating of 2.9, which positions it well for producing efficient spins without being overly sensitive to spin variations. Given its weight classification as medium (approximately 50 grams when cut to standard size), it allows for good maneuverability without sacrificing power. Durability is another strength of the P-1, receiving a high score of 9.1, ensuring consistent performance over time. Therefore, players can expect this rubber to withstand the rigors of intensive play while maintaining its responsiveness.

While the Fastarc P-1 excels in speed and linear performance, it may not be the best option for generating heavy topspin, as some users have noted difficulties in this area. Alternatives worth considering for those looking for similar characteristics include the well-regarded Nittaku G-1 and Xiom Omega V series. Ultimately, the Fastarc P-1 is tailored for players who value speed and control, particularly when playing aggressively from mid to long distances from the table.

Recent Reviews

#1 — November 2022

I got this in a review whiteboard box, and I have to say this rubber is depending on which sponge thickness. If it is at max, it is clearly a 9.5 fast rubber and 9.5 in spin. It was made ten years after G1, so I would say that in max, it is as reviewed, but in 1.6 or 1.8, it is otherwise. Of course, this is something that is almost never mentioned in these reviews, but keep in mind that there is a very large difference between this, and it is seldom named in the score.

#2 — March 2022

Spin and Arc:
Difficult to generate spin, resulting in a lower arc than typically desired.

#3 — March 2021

I paired the AnE BH on an Andro Timber 7 Offensive blade, and on the FH I used the C1. Also, Nitakku. I am able to loop comfortably and play backspin balls. It’s amazing how much control I have. I’ve only had it for 4 hours, and I’m already amazing at it. Consistent loops, smashes, and good forehand control.

Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.