Stiga Calibra Tour S
Rubber description:
This rubber is a tensor characterized by a distinct lack of surface tackiness and a unique, somewhat unconventional playing feel. Despite the top sheet being non-tacky and resembling an anti-spin rubber in texture, it is capable of generating significant spin on serves and topspin attacks when utilized with proper technique. Its physical properties are highlighted by a noticeably lightweight construction and a firm sponge that retains a high degree of responsiveness.
Performance Characteristics
- Speed and Control: The rubber offers a direct, powerful response with good speed, though it is often described as lacking in dwell time. The trajectory is relatively flat, and the response to incoming shots is consistent, which aids in control during active attacking play.
- Spin Generation: While it can produce considerable spin on high-effort strokes, it requires refined technique to maximize its potential. It lacks the ability to generate high spin levels on shorter, compact movements or during passive blocks, often resulting in a more linear, “hit and push” style of play.
- Feel and Dwell Time: A defining feature is the absence of traditional dwell time or tactile feedback. Users often report a lack of “ball feel” during contact, which can make the rubber feel detached or flat, particularly during touch play or sensitive serves.
- Durability and Weight: The rubber is exceptionally lightweight compared to many standard alternatives. However, users have noted that the surface grip may degrade over several months, leading to a loss of spin potential and an increase in unpredictable, “bouncy” behavior.
Submit a Review
Recent Reviews
#1 — August 2022
This rubber is quite peculiar. After some time of use, it lost its grip and acquired a noticeable amount of bounce. It can launch the ball with just a light stroke; however, it generates almost no spin when struck hard.
It behaves similarly to a tensor rubber, but with fewer gears. I use it on my backhand with an 8-ply ALL blade. Overall, it encourages a very straightforward playing style: hit and push, hit and push.
#2 — December 2021
Produced monstrous amounts of spin with serves and topspin attacks. It also provided good control; however, after three months of usage, the performance felt flat.
#3 — June 2015
I used the 1.9mm rubber on both the forehand and backhand of my allround blade.
Unfortunately, I found it challenging to generate good topspin with shorter forehand movements. Additionally, I often made contact with the wood during more direct hits, which detracted from my overall playing experience.
At around 39g, this rubber is a decent middle-of-the-road option; however, I do not find it to be exceptional. I am certain that players with advanced technique can utilize it effectively, but since my technique isn’t as refined, I personally would prefer a rubber that offers more spin from short-move interactions, particularly for topspin and sidespin blocks.
I purchased this rubber at a lower price than the Xiom Vega Europe, but I overall prefer the Vega. It provides more spin from shorter strokes, has a higher throw angle, and performs equally well in other aspects.
Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.