Yinhe Apollo III
Submit a Review
Reviews
#1 â September 2020
Best performance for the price. This rubber offers excellent spin and chop capabilities.
#2 â October 2017
The rubber is quite heavy and there arenât many advantages for professional players. Overall, itâs okay, but I prefer the Apollo 2 for both the backhand and forehand. The durability is average, especially when taking extra care of it.
#3 â May 2015
This is a very good looping rubber, as well as an excellent choice for serves.
#4 â December 2014
I liked this rubber from the very first day. However, I had a feeling that it wouldnât last long. If you are considering buying this rubber, you would be better off spending a bit more money. Alternatively, you can replace it quite frequently.
This rubber is only good for looping.
#5 â May 2013
This rubber performs significantly better when paired with a faster blade. I have it installed on a moderately fast Carbon Double Fish blade, and it provides good spin and control.
While it is not overwhelmingly powerful, it does require a longer stroke compared to other rubbers. It works effectively for serve returns and flipping over the table, and it blocks well.
#6 â January 2013
Hardness: 38 Degrees
The hardness of the rubber is rated at 38 degrees, which provides a balanced feel during play. This level of hardness offers a good combination of control and spin, allowing players to execute precise shots while maintaining a comfortable grip on the ball.
Overall, the performance of the rubber is impressive, catering to various playing styles.
Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews
ŕźź 㤠â_â ༽㤠No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.