Stiga CC5

It’s a wonderful blade. No joke! I tried Amultart Zl and it’s so much better, with greater feel and touch. It has it all, easy looping and flicking. Due to its long trajectory, your strokes land perfectly on the table no matter the distance. In the short game, it has no rival. The reviews do no favor to it, as it’s probably the best from Stiga and carbon blades. Get it while you can!

This crystal carbon blade combines a long dwell time with good control. Though it is not stiff or hard, I perceive it more as soft. However, it performs very well with topspin and looping attacks. It is a good blocking blade, so I can confidently say that my ball returns remain in bounds.

Initially, I was underwhelmed by the blade, as I expected a faster one. After further use, I discovered the optimal way to wield it, resulting in a fast, spiny, and controlled blade. For optimum performance, I utilize DHS H3 Neo on FH and Xiom Vega Pro on BH.

I was seeking a carbon blade with controllability, and a trustworthy store employee recommended this blade among several discounted options I had selected. Initially, I was concerned after reading negative online reviews citing poor quality and an allegedly “long trajectory” that could result in frequent balls hitting off the table.

However, upon testing the blade, I was relieved to find these concerns unfounded. I had previously used an all-wood offensive blade and experienced no difficulty in adapting to this one. While slightly faster, the control remained comparable. I’m uncertain if the trajectory altered significantly, but I can confirm that my shots landed on the table with the same frequency as before.

Against familiar opponents, they faced greater challenges blocking my topspin. The spin level was similar, but the shots were noticeably faster, particularly the flat hits. Additionally, I observed a significant improvement in the grip of the ball during my backhand loop, allowing me to generate exceptional spin.

To me, this blade felt like shifting up a gear, precisely meeting my expectations. However, I’m aware of another blade (possibly the CC7?) that may offer even more speed, which is an alluring prospect. I plan to experiment with a slightly harder sponge, having tested it with Xiom Vega Europe and Acuda S2.

Regarding quality, the negative reviews were justified. The handle has poor craftsmanship and feels somewhat sharp. I’m puzzled why STIGA overlooks such details, especially in a blade priced over €100.

In summary, this blade is an excellent choice for attacking players. While I’m not convinced it’s worth the full price, if you find a substantial discount, it’s a valuable addition to your arsenal.

The blade has a great balance. Its linear growth rate provides an excellent sense of control. While other blades may have difficulty finding the right rubber, this one is easy to adjust to your style of play. It offers an amazing feel for the ball with minimal vibration.

In terms of speed, it is slightly faster than the Rozevuda 5. The control and spot working are outstanding, making it suitable for applying thin rubber. The optimal rubber degrees are 42 and 45.

The best table tennis racket blade that I’ve used.

I would recommend this blade to players who play offensively. :):

This blade stands out as highly distinctive. Despite its long trajectory, it maintains control over the ball’s angle and the power delivered, even from a distance. As a player who favors playing away from the table, this blade has significantly elevated my game. Its exceptional trajectory surpasses that of the CC7, offering superior control and precision, allowing for the ball to be placed exactly where intended.

Very good for back of the table topspin and blocking. The control is very good far off the table and it is of the perfect weight.

It’s a blade for speed. If you are a player who is going to attack and just keep attacking, it’s a great blade for you!