Tibhar Black Carbon

Composite/carbon

15 Reviews

#1November 2017

The handle is uncomfortable and too small for my hand. I was looking for something fast, but this blade is way too fast. Control is poor. If you intend to play with this blade, use soft, slow rubbers. Durability-wise, I accidentally hit it on the floor and it shattered. I bought it from a local store. Afterward, I searched for products sold online or from an official distributor—not this trademark. Believe me, there are much better trademarks than Tibhar.

#2September 2017

This blade is a good choice for using with high-performance “pimp out” rubbers, such as those designed to create disruption and unusual spin.

#3November 2011

Very Fast Blade. I am using a Chinese Pen holder with T05. This combo is a dream. It provides ultra fast attack, with very nice control. Because of the Layer of Carbon fiber, it has a big spot, with the same consistency. I only had a problem with glueing the rubber. I had to make use of sandpaper to glue it properly. This is the only negative point that I can write. It is a hard blade, but the touch is amazing. It has a great sound too.

#4November 2010

In my quest to replace an old Tibhar IV-S, I gave this blade a try. The first apparent thing is that the carbon layer seems to be the outer layer, which was surprising. With the addition of some painting on the surface, it becomes nearly impossible to glue. I resorted to using sandpaper to get my rubber to stick to the blade and smooth out some edges that were causing blisters.

I tried it with Boost TX on the forehand and Tenergy 64 on the backhand, resulting in a weight of around 85 grams. My style involves heavy forehand topspins and hard-hitting backhands.

My opinion on the result is mixed. First, the blade has quite a hard contact. My soft Tenergy 64 felt more like a harder Mark V M2 on the IV-S. The ball does not penetrate the rubber as much, resulting in a shorter dwell time. Pushing backspin with the Tenergy was difficult, providing minimal spin compared to other softer blades.

Control is also poor, leading me to miss many serves with my forehand. Despite this, I could execute decent topspins with my backhand, benefiting from increased accuracy and speed.

On the forehand, however, ball control was challenging. I lacked any sensation of spin while topspinning, leading me to believe the carbon layer prevented vibrations. Despite this, my topspins usually landed on the table, with the exception of an occasional major issue. Softer rubber like Boost TS might improve the situation. Notably, during training, I managed to generate exceptional spin, with the ball nearly reversing direction before hitting the table, reminiscent of using speed glue.

The caveat is that I could not consistently reproduce this spin. This may be due to my technique, but it highlights my main issue with the blade: its inconsistency. The sweet spot appears to be located only along the central axis of the bat, and rebound is poor orthogonally, even a few centimeters from the edge. While centering the ball might solve this, other blades I’ve tested perform much better in this regard.

The handle was also too small for my liking, despite my average-sized hands. Blocking was difficult, and the weight was too forward-heavy.

In conclusion:

- It is an extremely fast blade, enabling impressive power with accuracy. - It is relatively light, but the weight is unevenly distributed. - Spin generation is challenging, but exceptional topspins are achievable when executed correctly. - The blade has significant inconsistencies in rebound, making it difficult to control.

#5February 2020

Excelente madera, la mayoría la pasa por alto y no saben de lo que se pierden.

#6January 2018

Fast Blade.

Great control and speed.

#7February 2017

Quite fast, light but controllable blade. You can easily do loops, spins, and from the other side you can block your opponent’s hits quite well. I use it with Andro Impuls Powersponge for the FH and Andro GTT 40 for the BH. The combination is remarkable. It is a little bit head-heavy with these rubbers, but as you start playing, you cannot feel this remark. The price is perfect for the quality that is offered. Thanks TT11 for the fast delivery!

#8October 2015

Blade and the performance are worth comparing with the cost of the blade.

#9August 2014

Lightweight. Very fast in response.

#10April 2020

Fast enough but inaccurate. It needs a lot of training to manage it.

#11March 2019

Extremely fast wood with a musical sound :-). If you know what I mean…

#12June 2018

I had this blade with Blade Lacquered. The blade generates a loud sound when impacting with the ball. This blade performs quite fast and light. It’s controllable while in the short ball game. The blade handle is small, which is more suitable for small hands. This blade is also suitable for playing long distances. I use it with Andro Roxon for the FH and Tenergy 64 for the BH. This blade is worth buying and the price is perfect for the quality it offers. Thanks TT11 for the great service.

#13November 2017

Excellent.

#14April 2016

Review text:

Very fast play and blocks are also good. Drives much better and very lightweight as well.

#15July 2015

To be honest, I was initially attracted by the appearance of this paddle, but in fact, when I got my hands on it, I felt that the workmanship was rough. The surface is just a layer of coating, similar to the coating used for Stiga anti-adhesive. In comparison, the actual function is only for show. The ST handle is as thin as the Three Carbon crown, but compared to the Three Carbon crown, the middle Balsa core is combined into one piece, removing the carbon layer in the middle. I haven’t played with it yet. Structure of 5+2: high-tech coating + Limba + Ayous + carbon layer + Balsa.

Popular Tibhar blades

Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.