Butterfly Tenergy 25

I’ve written a review here in 2010 and got upset with table tennis and the plastic ball in 2014. But since I lost a lot of weight and my knee doesn’t hurt, I’m back in business and, after some trials, I got back to my old love: The T 25!

There is no other rubber like this. You may not like it, but if you do there’s no replacement. The best word to describe the feeling when you play it is chunky. It’s the only rubber I know in the field of true high-tech rubbers when it comes to versatility and control. It’s purely wonderful at everything, except maybe lifting underspin. But since that is one of my favorite shots, I don’t mind at all. That would actually be the only trait from the T 05 I would prefer.

I cannot recommend it as the FX Version though. That’s completely different. It is absolutely a must-try, because there’s nothing like it and if it’s only for the sake of the experience.

Last thing I want to say: A defensive player I know played it for two years and it still was putting tons of spin in the ball.

First impressions: I think it has a better ball feel compared to T05 because of the different pimple structure. Feels like there’s a spring feel effect on the pimples, not only the sponge. Not good for carbon blades, as it has no control.

This is the control version of Tenergry. While it is not as fast as the other versions, you get amazing control.

Spin is good. You get enough of it to finish a point. However, there are spinner rubbers out there, and the same with speed.

Control is perfect with Tenergry. Chops and blocks, or basically a modern defensive game with this rubber, is really good.

I think I’ll stick with the 25 for now as it suits my game.

Using 1.8mm red rubber on a Butterfly Mazunov blade for 6 months, I play close to the table. I get good angles from blocking, great spin, and awesome smashes! I love how fast this combination works. I play very consistently with it, but because of that, the rubber’s durability is relatively low compared to other rubbers. After 4 months (3 times a week for 3-4 hours), the center of the rubber was worn out. However, I will buy it again.

I just started using this rubber on my BH. I use this rubber on a Ma Lin Carbon blade with Tenergy 64 as FH.

My BH has always been weak and now I have finally completed my search. This rubber is like a beast, amazing topspins and easy flicks that don’t require much power.

However, once you get far away from the table, it acts much differently. As I said before, this rubber is a beast. Once you know how to control a beast, you literally become a god. I prefer people who have a good game from close to the table should get this rubber.

I, and many others, believe this is the fastest of the Tenergys. It is significantly faster than the T64. It performs wonderfully close to the table.

Review:

Just wow! What an amazing rubber. It is probably the most underrated Tenergry rubbers. But I feel like this is honestly the best one. You guys should try it out!

Really didn’t get this rubber. Felt like a Mark V/Chinese substitute.

Really fantastic backhand rubber for blocking and punching, but it is considerably harder to loop backspin with (unless you have good technique). It is heavy due to the wide pimples on it which could make it not good for some people.

However, what I noticed most about this rubber is how great the close-to-the-table attacking block/punch shots are; the power really opens up when you hit it flatter. I wouldn’t recommend this rubber for someone who defends or likes to loop with heavy topspin, but it will be very nice for anyone who blocks and punches a lot.

Only my opinion so don’t take it too seriously :)

Out of the Tenergy series, this seems to be the least popular, possibly due to its weight from the larger pimples.

Comparing the T25 to T05 and T64 on a Viscaria blade for backhand, the T25 surprisingly emerged as the favorite. It feels slightly harder than T05, which enhances its blocking capabilities. T64, on the other hand, feels softer in comparison.

The throw angle initially felt unusual, with a less noticeable catapult effect than T05/T64. However, with adjustment, the T25 exhibits the best arc, akin to T05 but shorter than T64 & T80.

Designed for short distance play, the T25 has a similar arc characteristic to T05 but a shorter trajectory. It’s surprisingly fast when force is applied.

The T25 excels in short/mid games, providing more control and predictability on stiff carbon blades. This enhances consistency during these phases. Notably, for non-professionals or non-defensive players, most points originate from short/mid games rather than high-level pro-play or defensive tactics.

I found this rubber disappointing. I tested it on both my forehand (FH) and backhand (BH), but had to switch it after about 10 days. It did not complement my looping game style at all.

Although I occasionally use chops or placement punches/blocks, this rubber did not suit my needs. Ultimately, it proved to be a complete flop for me. Consequently, I would not recommend it.

Certainly, the throw angle is higher than 05.

• Compared to T Energy 05 and 64, the pimple surface on the inside is simply massive.
• The large pimples inside help with controlling shots.
• It is excellent for close to the table play as you can counter any hard hit shots easily while maintaining control. But when you need to hit a little bit harder, the rubber still provides enough power.
• I am a penholder that uses Reverse-Penhold Backhand occasionally but I don’t use it all the time. I was looking for a rubber that could handle flicks, counter-attacking from up close, and could handle my mediocre RBP technique. This rubber handled everything.
• I had T-Energy 64 before and I honestly couldn’t handle the sheer power of it so I wanted something more controlled and manageable. T-Energy 25 was the perfect solution to my RPB since I don’t use it very often. And when I need to use RPB, I feel confident I can counter any shots with ease.
• It is excellent up close and can handle medium distance relatively well but more effort is required.
• I use 1.9mm red rubber sheet.

The best rubber for blocking and fast topspin.
Very suitable for the backhand.

Review

Update: I recently switched to playing with Tenergy 25 on both sides, and my search is finally complete. I cannot emphasize enough how fantastic this rubber is. It offers great versatility. You can hit it softly and precisely with the hard rubber, generate a decent amount of spin on a short push using only the topsheet, and unleash an unlimited supply of power on hard swings. While it may not always seem as fast as 05/64, its hard rubber characteristics excel with proper footwork and arm speed, resulting in unmatched speed and trajectory.

Furthermore, on an off-the-bounce shot or a block, the rubber effortlessly puts the ball over the net and onto the other side of the table.

If you master controlling the sponge and topsheet, its serves will surpass 05/h3/tg2 and other quality rubbers.

This rubber is highly underrated. Using it on both sides, I beat a player over 500 points over my rank with ease. While rubber is not always the solution, it can greatly assist if it aligns with your style.

This rubber caters to the demands of a tennis player. Additionally, if you prefer a Chinese forehand but desire some catapult, this rubber will suffice. It excels in pacing and driving.

Performance Comparison

Short Push: T80 = T25 > T05 > T64
Counterloop: T25 > T80 > T64 > T05
Brush Loop: T05 > T25 > T80 > T64
Drive: T25 > T64 > T80 > T05
Chop: T25 > T05 = T80 > T64
Lifting Underspin: T05 > T80=T25=T64
Mid-distance: T64 > T25 > T05 > T80
Control: T25 > T05=T80 > T64
Speed: T64 (less/equal) T25 > T80=T05

It’s crucial to note that technique plays a significant role in these evaluations.

Review: T25 vs T05 1.7mm Black

I tested the T25 1.7mm black as a potential replacement for my T05 1.7mm black. I play with a Yinhe 980 blade, Spinlord Dornenglanz long pips, and Tenergy 05 1.7mm. I am an allrounder who plays near the table, using spin, blocks, and smashes. My style is a mix of Pushblocker and Akkertrom.

In a word, the T25 is “Perfect.”

I liked the T05 very much, but I struggled with delicate pushes, returns, and blocks. I often had difficulty keeping the ball on the table.

With the T25, I retain most of the T05’s great qualities while significantly improving the control I lacked with the T05.

Block: Blocking is much easier with the T25. I immediately notice increased control, enabling me to vary the depth and placement of my shots. I can absorb the energy of incoming loops and execute short, dead blocks or accelerate them. Smashing incoming loops is also facilitated by the T25’s control.

Smash: Similar to blocking, the T25 offers great control, providing confidence for smashing.

Pushes: With the T05, keeping pushes short and on the table consistently challenged me. The T25 eliminates the catapult effect that hindered my pushes, allowing me to control the ball’s length and placement.

Serves: Compared to the T05, the T25 makes it easier to place the ball and keep it lower. However, I felt I could generate slightly more spin with the T05, making it more effective for serves in that aspect.

Loops: The T25 produces a flatter ball trajectory than the T05. The T05 has a very high throw, while the T25’s throw is lower but still higher than many other rubbers. I also sense that the T25 imparts slightly less spin on the ball. While still spinny, the T25 requires closer attention to the net due to its flatter trajectory. Although the trajectory is flatter, the T25 remains responsive for looping balls easily from mid-distance.

For counter-looping near the table, I find the T25 superior to the T05. Due to its higher throw, the T05 is less effective in this scenario. With the T25, the ball tends to go long on certain shots, such as looping incoming serves or counter-spinning incoming loops near the table. The lower throw of the T25 provides better results for these shots.

Far from the table, the T05 offers greater ease and effectiveness. The T25 is still capable, but it requires more energy to return balls to the table.

Throw Angle: T05 = Very high, T25 = Average
Spin: T05 = 9/10, T25 = 8/10
Control: T05 = 6.5/10, T25 = 9/10
Speed: T05 = 9/10, T25 = 8/10
Hardness: T05 = 7/10, T25 = 7/10

While opinions vary on the speed of these rubbers, I believe the T25 is slightly less speedy than the T05. The improved control may contribute to this perception.

Regarding hardness, the T25 did not feel noticeably harder. The larger pips on the T25 impart a different feel.

Conclusion: The T25 is a perfect fit for my playstyle. While I appreciated the T05, the T25 retains its great qualities and adds essential ones that align with my style. It has earned my approval.

This rubber possesses substantial power, although controlling it initially may prove challenging. With practice, it exhibits exceptional spin characteristics, featuring an optimal level of tackiness that facilitates the execution of loops.

I have played with Galaxy Sun and Moon for some time now. Some people have said that it compares with Tenergy rubbers. It played well; good control and speed are fair.

Today I played with my new Butterfly Balsa Carbo X5, with Tenergy 25 on the forehand and Sriver G3 FX on the backhand. WOW! It was a huge difference from the Galaxy range. To begin with, the T25 has very good control for fast and harder rubber. The speed is very good and ideal for play close to the table and on medium distance. I am sure it will be fine on longer range too.

The Sriver G3 FX is nice and soft, and WOW! It gives me very good control on backhand attack and on defense. The control on chopping/backspin is fantastic. I have finally found the rubbers for my kind of game.

I currently use this rubber. It has good speed and spin, but it is very expensive. I plan to switch to Rakza 7 after using this rubber.

Como é uma borracha de ângulo um pouco mais baixo do que as outras Tenergy’s, ela ficou perfeita para o meu back.

Como meu back é mais aberto do que meu fore, eu nunca achei borrachas que combinassem perfeitamente. Mas aí eu testei a T25 no fore e a T64 no back.

Ficou bom, mas quando eu fiz o contrário… FICOU PERFEITO!

Eu aconselho essa combinação a todos.

This is a rubber for the future! It excels in both close to the table and mid-length shots. I love the spinny and speedy shots that this rubber provides me with.

T25 is a fast, spiny rubber with good control. I read from someone that it is a nightmare to lift a chop ball, but I don’t know about that. My blade, Timo Boll ZLF with T25, lifts any ball.

I recently replaced my Firehand blade with Shriver EL rubber with a Viscaria and Tenergy 25. My forehand loops are incredible with this rubber. I have no problem looping underspin. I’m a mid to close to the table player. I am having some trouble hitting consistent backhands with the Tenergy, but find the push game to be fine. I have played with it for two weeks and have noticed quite an improvement.

The amount of speed and spin from the Shriver to the Tenergy 25 is incredible. I have been playing in a club for a year and a half, and now feel ready to use spinnier/faster rubber. I feel this was a great transition.

People I know seem to love the 05, and 64 Tennergy. I really enjoy the 25.

Everyone keeps telling me that 05 is way better. They’re wrong :D this rubber is amazing!

Can this rubber, with the FX version, work well with the KeyShot Light blade?

I actually have two 05s.

I’m not sure what you mean by “pervert rubber.” Could you please clarify?

I’ve been using this rubber for a year now. I was previously a Tenergy 05 user. They are pretty much the same, but with different topsheets. 25 has the large pimple topsheet, which makes it less reactive compared to 05. That means you need to loop with better technique, full stroke, and power. Passive looping or little effort loops are not recommended. With 05 you can loop underspin with a little flick and flat hit with soft effort, can’t do that with 25. So it may take time to find or adjust the stroke. It took me about a month or so to adjust my strokes.

25 lasts very long, maybe even longer than 05, maybe because of the bigger pimples. The first few weeks the topsheet is a little sticky, so some people will say 25 lasts only a week. But I think these people are brushing too much and have not figured out the rubber.

I think Tenergy 25 is only suited for the close to table power looper. Unlike, 05 which can accompany almost any style. However, I don’t recommend any of the tenergy series for players under 1600 usatt. You need a solid foundation before you can build a tower.

A great rubber, one of the best I’ve tried. It does what you ask of it.

Pros:

• Lower throw angle than other Tenergy rubbers, enabling effective close-to-table blocks and attacks
• Crisp feel, distinct from Tenergy 05
• Slightly improved control compared to other Tenergy rubbers, potentially due to the throw angle
• Durable, nearly comparable to Chinese rubbers, likely due to the large pips embedded
• Performs well in smashing and looping

Cons:

• Expensive, comparable to other Tenergy rubbers
• Requires a longer stroke when playing from a few feet away

During the last year, I’ve extensively tested over 20 different inverted rubbers, including all of the Tenergies. I’ve compared them to a few ESN-rubbers and quicker Chinese rubbers like LKT Rapid Speed, Friendship Higher 1-3, and Spin Art (which is not close to the Tenergies). I’ve decided to stick with Tenergy 25. It might produce slightly less spin than Tenergy 05, but it has other properties that make it the better rubber for my game.

One important factor is blocking. Blocking with the Tenergy 05 only works well if you block actively (spin-block). For me as a mid-class player, it’s also important to be able to block passively, which the T25 does perfectly. In my opinion, this is because the T25 is softer than T05, despite being promoted as the hardest. It’s definitely softer than T05 and harder than T64. Blocking and hitting are superb with T25.

The T25 pushes more controlled than the T05 and produces the same amount of spin. The T25 top-spins have a lower throw than with T05, but countertopping from midrange works extremely well. It’s highly dynamic and gives you the feeling that the rubber has a built-in powerplant that throws the top-spin back at your opponent. Counterloops over the table work perfectly, which is important because I play a long pimple ox on one side of the bat and often chop-block or chop from mid-distance. I rarely play from long distance and force my opponents to return the spinny but fast chop-blocks with a push, which I will attack with T25 on backhand or forehand, or counter-top the slow and spinny top-spins over the table or the highest point.

The biggest surprise with the T25 is its chopping ability. It’s seriously crazy. I’ve chopped with all the offensive rubbers I’ve tested, and there is not one that is even slightly as good as the T25. Even with little time to react, a short energetic movement with the wrist leads to a dead straight ball loaded with spin. Even when the next top-spin comes slower and with extreme spin, you can control the chops extremely well. Joo Sea Hjuk does this very well with T64, but with the T25, it’s much easier to control the ball and keep it shallow.

The conclusion is that although none of the famous players seem to play the T25, it’s the most versatile. I know two more modern defensive players who play it, one of whom is a teenager playing in a German talent pool. I’m convinced that more high-level defenders will use it in the future.

The T25 is an outstanding all-round rubber! I play it on the Juic Kalinic Allround, a stiff blade for an all-round and more of an Off- blade. I also tested over 30 different long-pips and now play the Double Fish 1615 ox (my role model Lo Chuen Tsung used to play), the best pimple for chop-blocking and chopping from mid-distance in my opinion. I play the T25 in 2.1mm. The talent pool player plays it in 1.9mm on a Timo Boll Spark and combines it with a Curl P1 R ox. He got the Spark from Ruwen Filus, who also plays it but uses T05 and doesn’t chop with the inverted rubber at all.

Greetz 2U all.

Very hard, for a controlled offensive player who likes the hard and controlled game!

Loops and counterloops are very enjoyable to play with this rubber. Serves are spinny and easy to place on the table. The short game is also very good with this rubber.

If you like to loop with a more forward style stroke near the table, then I would advise using the T25. If you prefer looping against loop with a more upwards style stroke, then you should consider using the T05.

If you like to loop far away from the table, the best choice is the T64.

This rubber is an absolute delight to use, receiving a perfect score of 10. It offers an exceptional combination of spin, speed, and control, even during passive strokes. As a forehand rubber, it excels, allowing for incredibly spinny loops on underspin and powerful topspin drives against your opponent.

One key difference between this rubber and T05 is that you don’t need to compromise power when lifting the ball. This means you can play as aggressively as you desire. With T05, the throw angle tends to be too high, making loops on underspin more vulnerable to blocking.

Ultimately, the choice between T05 and T25 depends on your playing style. If your game revolves around spinny topspins, T05 might be a better option. However, if you prefer a balance of spinny loops and fast strokes, with the ability to effectively block, T25 is the superior choice.

Great control and lightning fast speed. Perfect for over/close to the table and mid distance attacking type of play. I just love it on my forehand side.

If you can put up with the pace it delivers, you don’t need anything else.

I combine it with a Donic Lagonda blade and couldn’t be more pleased.

Can anyone write on here how this rubber compares to Boost TC?

I’ve played with many state-of-the-art rubbers, including 64 and 05. Of them, 25 is by far my favorite, primarily because of its ability to loop any and all amounts of spin. It offers above-average blocking capabilities and has blinding speed. I rate it higher than both 05 and 64.

Butterfly Tenergy 25 Review

The Butterfly Tenergy 25 shares some drawbacks with the 05, including its weight (particularly in 2.1mm) and cost. However, it also exhibits many positive qualities while behaving quite differently.

Despite being marketed by Butterfly as the “hard” version, the 25’s hardness is more noticeable in its playing characteristics than in its feel. All Tenergies utilize the same sponge, but the 25 features massive pips on its rubber sheet. This results in a lower throw angle compared to the 05 and 64, though it is not as low as that of a Hurricane series rubber.

While the 25 provides the excellent pace and spin of a Tenergy (with loaded serves), its lower throw angle facilitates easier blocking and hitting. Flipping and looping over the table are also comfortable, but mid-distance and long-distance shots require more effort than with the 05 and 64. The firmer feel leads to slightly reduced spin generation, but the difference is marginal and the rubber still produces far more spin than the previous generation of High Tension/Tensors. Additionally, its durability is comparable to the 05’s, which has proven to be surprisingly long-lasting if handled with care.

For players who primarily play over the table or those who have experience with glued, low-throw Chinese rubbers, the Tenergy 25 is highly recommended. While the reviewer still prefers the 05 on the forehand, the 25 has proven to be a better fit on the backhand and is currently their choice for that side.

Tenergy 25 is very similar to the 05 in that it offers the same explosiveness and power, with more spin added to the mix. After four weeks of rigorous practice with this rubber, I can confidently declare that the 05 remains my top choice, primarily due to the Tenergy 25’s comparatively low throw angle. While counterlooping, blocking, and serving are all highly effective with the 25, lifting chop balls becomes a significant challenge.

Ultimately, the choice between the two rubbers is a matter of personal preference. However, I believe that the low throw angle is this rubber’s only notable flaw. If you prioritize a low throw angle, I would recommend the Tenergy 05 over the 25.

After much consideration and reluctance, I decided to purchase T25, although most players opt for T05 and T64. I initially anticipated the T25’s purported speed and spin to make it challenging to control. However, I was pleasantly surprised to find it manageable.

T25 excels at close to the table and mid-distance play. It facilitates consistent loops and drives with ample power and spin. I had assumed its effectiveness would diminish during mid to long distance rallies. However, thanks to the spring sponge technology and its speed rating, it performs well from both close and far distances.

Serves exhibit exceptional spin, and the initial topspin loops are effortless to execute, generating considerable pace. I was particularly impressed with the rubber’s control. The ball consistently lands on the table. Players with solid technique and strokes will find that T25 significantly enhances their gameplay and boosts their confidence, empowering them to handle any incoming shots.

Overall, T25 is a superb rubber, especially when paired with an arylate/carbon blade like the Michael Maze.

Amultart (86g) + T05 2.1 + T25 2.1. The blade is important when reviewing a rubber. Amultart is Hinoki/ZLC (outer but with a thick top wood).

T25 was good as FH for counter, block, sharp attack, smash, push, and serve. The throw angle is high enough to open on underspin balls in FH and BH. In BH, it is good for chikita, safe block, and receive. This rubber works well close to the table. At mid-distance, the ball is a bit short (T80 is better in that case). The ball doesn’t fly. I think Niwa Koki was using this combination in 2012, but I am not sure. Of course, this kind of combination demands good technique and footwork to be in front of the ball. If you are a bit lazy with legs, just go for D09C 2.1 or hard rubbers (52 to 54). I think that T19 is similar to T25.