Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.
Tensor 24 reviews
This rubber bears a striking resemblance to its counterpart, the T64, in terms of throw angle, speed, and spin. Having experimented with the 05FX and the 80FX, the T64FX ощущается distinctively different. Since I’ve employed all the aforementioned FX rubbers on my backhand, this review will focus solely on its performance in that position.
For this assessment, I used the T64FX (Red, 2.1mm) on a Butterfly Harimoto Innerforce ZLC. The thicker sponge was selected out of concern that, like other FX rubbers, it would prioritize spin over speed. However, this apprehension proved unfounded. This rubber closely resembles the standard T64 in its straightforward nature. Despite its softer sponge, the T64FX does exhibit a slight reduction in speed while boasting enhanced spin capabilities. Consequently, in protracted rallies, the T64FX often compels you to adopt a defensive lob when forced into the backhand, whereas the standard T64 offers the flexibility to either continue the rally or resort to a lob for strategic repositioning.
The nuances between these rubbers become even more evident when dealing with backspin. The T64FX demands a pronounced knee bend and a forehead-angled motion to counteract backspin effectively, resulting in increased spin and bounce. In contrast, the standard T64 requires a swift, circular motion, primarily driven by wrist and forearm power.
Ultimately, personal preferences and blade choice will determine which rubber is more suitable. While I favor the T64 for its superior speed and versatility, the T64FX offers a compelling alternative for those seeking enhanced spin. I hope this review has provided valuable insights. Let’s keep the game of table tennis alive and well!
One of the better backhand rubbers out there. The only con (as with all Tenergies) is the price.
This is a very different type of Tenergy, in my opinion. The FX Spring Sponge works very differently with the 64FX as it has a longer pimple height compared to the 05, hence producing a low throw and soft rubber, but still super fast.
People who like slow flex blades and soft rubbers but find difficulty with speed due to the soft rubber and blade will love this. It’s better on the forehand since the longer pimples mean that a harder stroke is required for the ball to get the throw above the net.
Works great for smashing.
Now, since it’s a low throw and fast, people may think that having an upward brushing action will do the lifting job and the speed will come by the fast rubber, but that’s absolutely wrong because the pimple structure is such that the long pimples need a more forward motion for the rubber to work. While brushing upwards, only the top sheet is used, so the ball is super slow and weird. It’s, however, good away from the table when fishing, lobbing, and countering topspin.
One more big confusion is that it’s bad for chopping, but in my opinion, it’s one of the best chopping rubbers and has beautiful control because of the long pimple structure.
I tried it on many blades:
Use it on a springy blade, and you will love it.
I think for the average player, the FX series is better on the 05 or 80 rubbers. The soft spring sponge and longer pimple height act weirdly and will take time to get used to.
UPDATE: After adjusting to it, it works pretty good for backhand also on my PG7 blade. It will take a month at least to get used to it, but overall feels more powerful than T05. I started playing this counter push shot even despite heavy backspin, it crosses the net, and goes to the other side of the table with backspin, making my opponent hit it to the net. I don’t know whether it’s spoiling my backhand from developing, but it feels amazing and really fun to do.
Great feel for my playing style. Others are using it for their backhand, but I use it on my forehand, and the control is good. I will also try the Tenergy 05-FX and 80-FX.
Let me start by saying that I’ve used several types of Tenergy rubbers on both forehand and backhand. These include T05fx, T05, T64, T64fx, and T80 (see my other reviews on these other types).
I find that the 64 series is very suitable for backhand if you prefer a blocking style. T64 is best for aggressive direct blocking, but it doesn’t offer much in terms of gears. T64fx, on the other hand, provides more controlled blocking, which is not as aggressive but still direct and very suitable for the banana flick on service receive. It also offers more gears than the standard T64.
Additionally, I have found that the 64 series is less reactive to incoming spin. However, it also produces less spin than T05, T05fx, and T80.
I had Tenergy 05 1.9 on a Time Boll Spirit for years before changing to this rubber. I also had no problem lifting backspin and pushing, but would often lose control of the ball during fast rallies. My forehand suffered from this the most even though my technique is OK on both wings.
Since using this rubber, my forehand has become a much more consistent and powerful shot. My backhand has only dipped a little because the rubber has a lower throw which has helped me keep control of the ball on the forehand side during counter drives and topspins. I tend to open up on a push receive more often on the backhand and this is where I’m having to make more adjustments to lift the ball.
The rubber blocks much better and returns serves much better than Tenergy 05. It works best at mid-distance because of the straight trajectory. I can produce high spin serves and flicks but more of a light touch is required in comparison to Tenergy 05. I’m glad I took the risk and tried this rubber. I’m very happy with it.
Not a practical backhand rubber, but interestingly, it is not a bad forehand rubber. It has a very nice off-table loop.
I’ve been using this rubber for 2 months now. At first, I used it for my backhand on a Zhang Jike blade. Before, I had a T64, but I didn’t like it very much because I lost a lot of power and effectiveness in my backhand. This was strange because it’s said to be the same, but with more spin, giving you more control.
In my opinion, it’s not like that. It’s a different rubber in some aspects. The topspins and loops change a lot compared to the T64, but the pushes and blocks are still amazing, as are the flicks.
After 3 weeks, I decided to use it as a forehand rubber, and now I can truly say that it’s a rubber worthy of being called TENERGY. Wow, what a difference! The spin on the topspins, loops, and counterattacks is monstrous. It must really depend on the technique of each player, but I feel that this T64 FX has more control and the same power as the regular T64.
I highly recommend it for those who used T64 for forehand and want a little more control. I can’t comment on its durability because I’ve only had it for 2 months. In conclusion, it’s an excellent rubber for forehand.
UPDATE: After using it for 2 months on the forehand, the rubber has inexplicably lost a lot of spin and power.
I use Tenergy 64-FX on the backhand of a Kasumi Basic in 1.9. I switched from using Tenergy 05 only a couple of days ago, and what a relief it has been! With 05, my shots were going off the table when I tried to just hit, and receiving was a definite issue.
64-FX has solved both of those problems. I can do anything I want with it, and looping with it from any distance—close or far—isn’t difficult at all. Although the pushes sometimes go a little higher than I want, this is definitely a more all-purpose rubber than 05.
If you are a hardcore looper, then pick 05, but if you need to push or hit, try this out. You get more speed, a little less spin, but tons more control. If you really flick your wrists while using this on the backhand, your shots will come low and fast at your opponent.
Cleaning this is a breeze, and there are not any real problems with 64-FX (except maybe the pushing, but it’s better than all the other Tenergys). Butterfly, many of your products may be overpriced, but at least when I paid my $64 and tried this out, I felt I got my money’s worth.
Like this much better than T05fx. T05fx has a higher throw and tends to get a bit uncontrollable with shot selection. In contrast, T64fx is fast, spinny, and more linear than T05fx. Plays very well at all distances.
Great power with nice control. Intermediate-level players can use this rubber to elevate their game to the next level. The price is outstanding for the quality of the rubber.
Works very well on forehand also in 2.1 thickness on a flexible, fast blade for close/mid-distance looping and hitting. However, it lacks a small bit of power away from the table, which is more affected by blade selection than the rubber itself.
I purchased a 2.1mm sheet of this rubber from a teammate and placed it on the backhand side of a Stiga Intensity NCT. The results have been astonishing. The rubber facilitates effortless generation of spin and power, with an ideal dwell time. Its medium-low throw angle suits offensive developing players, particularly on the backhand. The rubber also excels in serves and short game play.
However, on the forehand, I personally prefer the 05-fx due to its higher throw angle. Nonetheless, I am highly impressed with this rubber and intend to continue using it indefinitely on my backhand.
Review Text (Edited):
This was kind of a disappointment after T-05 FX. I was expecting something similar with a bit more speed and a little less spin. However, these are two very different rubbers (amazing level of difference, considering that the only thing that distinguishes them is the position and shape of pips).
Speed - yes, a bit faster than T-05 FX.
Spin - less than T-05 FX; lots less in lighter strokes. You really need to apply yourself to generate a lot of spin.
Control - about the same as T-05 FX, but sometimes unexpectedly pops up the ball, or sends it long.
Basically zero of that softish ball-sticking-in-the-rubber feeling that I had with T-05 FX.
Very low throw, much lower than T-05 FX. Couldn’t use it on BH without severe adjustment of my grip.
The rubber is surprisingly much more linear in not-very-powerful shots than almost all other Tenergy rubbers. Almost made me say “this is not a Tenergy!”
Probably plays much better on thin flexy blades - mine are 7-8 mm thick with low or very low flex.
The best of the Tenergy range for my backhand needs. It has a lower throw than 64, 05, and 05-fx. Provides good speed, linear response, and good spin generation. It is the easiest Tenergy for blocking and flat hitting (without switching to the more specialized T25).
I tend to switch between this and 05-fx on the backhand side. 05-fx has the edge on raw looping, but 64-fx is more stable, better in all-round play and close-in, and easier for pushing and noodling around the table.
Very good rubber for BH. It is slightly slower than regular T64, but with better control. Spin is quite the same.
I used T64 max (BH on Viscaria) and T64FX max (BH on Stiga Intesity NCT) and I can say both are very good rubbers for BH.
For those who prefer softer, slower and more accurate rubber, go for T64 FX. For those very aggressive BH attackers with very good technique, go for T64. Best BH rubbers!
I started my Tenergy journey with 1.7 Tenergy 64fx FH and 1.7 Tenergy 05FXBH on Grubba Carbon blade. For that time, it was the best blade and FH rubber I had ever owned. I refined my game with 64FX and upgraded to 1.9 as my skills improved.
Currently, I have tried Tenergy 80 with a new Innerforce ALC blade. However, I’m not inclined to “learn” a new rubber as I am accustomed to Tenergy 64fx. It provides exceptional dwell time on my new blade. Despite being paired with a fast ALC blade, its speed is manageable for close-to-the-table play. Blocking is effortless, and at mid-distance, it possesses ample power for looping (especially when striking hard, activating the deeper carbon layer).
I have never received formal coaching and have developed my game by observing and playing against stronger opponents. Regardless, I consistently execute shots with precision. The transition from an ALL+ blade and rubber to an OFF/OFF- setup was seamless thanks to Tenergy 64fx.
Very good rubber. I have a better short game and counter looping because it has low throw and is not too much affected by incoming spin. It’s slightly faster than Roundell and spinnier with better control. I use it on FH but only used during 1 night (2 or 2 and a half hours). I will add more info when I play more with it.
I got this rubber as a replacement for my Bryce Speed FX, but I can’t feel much of a difference between the two. The topsheets are identical, but the sponge is different. Tenergy 64-FX has a harder sponge, the same as on the Tenergy 05-FX. Overall, it’s a great, speedy rubber that works great on my Darker Speed 90 blade as a backhand rubber. After all, I would prefer the extra spin of the Tenergy 05-FX versus the extra speed of the Tenergy 64-FX.
Great deals on table tennis rubber:
Watch out for great deals at www.sports3dx.com
Sports3dx recommends:
Galaxy T10
T-05 FX 1.9 mm
T-64 FX 1.9 mm
Thickness:
Choose 1.9 mm thickness over 2.1 mm irrespective of the blade you use, unless you are a 2500+ rated player.
Hopefully, that rubber will be a mix between the Bryce Speed FX and the Tenergy 05 FX. The speed, control, and catapult of the Bryce Speed FX combined with the spring sponge technology, spin, and control of the Tenergy would probably be the perfect rubber for me!!!
I am looking for a rubber that will provide me with maximum spin, as I am a spin-oriented player who plays close to the table. I have only used the 05-FX, not the 64. Would this rubber be a good choice for me?
Also, I would strongly recommend that Butterfly produce this rubber with maximum thickness and a 33° sponge hardness.
I guess the Tenergy 64 FX will be like the Bryce Speed FX. However, it will have much more spin and a spring sponge.
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.