Donic Bluefire JP 03

Tensor 17 reviews

17 Reviews

#1 — May 2018

Black rubber (1.7 mm) on a carbon blade is fantastic. It is one of the best rubbers from Donic, and I highly recommend it.

#2 — February 2017

I instantly fell in love with this rubber the first time I used it. The sound, the feel, the arc, and most of all, the spin is just so magnificent. It makes me want to play table tennis even more.

I conclude that this rubber is by far one of the most powerful rubbers, yet very easy to control.

#3 — January 2017

Bagi saya, rubber ini sangat seimbang dalam hal Spin, Speed, dan Control. Dari semua rubber yang pernah saya gunakan, seperti Yasaka Mark V AD, Hurricane 3 Neo, Yinhe 9000 II, dan Yasaka Rakza 7 Soft, inilah yang paling baik untuk gaya bermain ofensif.

#4 — May 2016

The rubber provides amazing control. It also offers a nice speed and spin. Overall, it’s a great choice.

#5 — March 2016

On wooden blades, it’s a boring rubber, slow, okay for blocking, good control, and okay for backhand. It’s a low-intermediate rubber with nothing special.

A sad version of Tenergy 05 FX.

#6 — November 2015

I use it in a Stiga Clipper Wood. It’s a nice rubber, very controlled, and not spin-sensitive. However, I have some dead shots that I can’t explain. Perhaps it’s better suited for a carbon blade rather than an all-wood blade.

#7 — June 2015

All the reviews for this rubber are very accurate here. I have already used two of them, and it is definitely a very good medium-soft sponge new rubber. If you want it faster, go to JP01. Durability is the only weak point, but the price is not bad. Try it, you’ll like it!

#8 — May 2015

Brilliant for backhand.

#9 — March 2015

I have tested JP03 2.0 red (new) versus my usual 1.9 Tenergy 05 black (2 weeks old) on the same OFF blade.

JP03

  • Lower throw
  • Less sensitive to incoming spin, so better serve return and smash
  • A bit softer
  • Easier to make short service
  • Topsheet after 4 hours of play already has oxidated finger marks.
  • Is slower and has less catapult compared to Tenergy (8.8 speed here is overrated, more like 8.5 speed)
  • Spin is also overrated, less than T05 … less in slow strokes and much less on powerful strokes
  • Topsheet not so grippy
  • Weight for 2.0 red - before cut 65g, after cut on OFF blade - 46g. Pretty heavy.

It’s a good BH rubber.

#10 — March 2015

Another great rubber from Donic that rivals the Tenergy series. This rubber is a suitable substitute for T05 FX.

The sponge hardness is comparable, but the springiness is slightly reduced, making this rubber more controlled than 05FX. It performs well on both flexible and hard blades.

The rubber exhibits a linear response, providing excellent feedback and feel. Blocks are low and short, yet clear the net.

Services and chops generate significant spin without excessive bounce, allowing for precise ball placement. Smashes and counterhits are accurate and linear.

Loops are satisfying regardless of style. The spin can be easily controlled, offering significant dwell time while being relatively insensitive to incoming spin.

Opening loops are highly spinny, effectively attacking any incoming ball.

Durability is a consideration. While the manufacturing quality is high, the tacky surface may wear out after approximately 30 hours of gameplay. This affects the rubber’s effectiveness, though it remains functional for training.

In comparison, the M series topsheet can handle up to 60 hours of play before showing signs of wear, which is why I prefer it.

#11 — December 2014

I liked it. However, I don’t understand how the JP03 rubber has worn out within a month despite playing table tennis three times a week. The durability of this rubber appears to be very low.

#12 — October 2014

Lower throw than M3, which is good news for those who prefer a lower throw and find it hard to keep the ball on the table. As always and in any case, I feel forced to soften it up a bit with oil in order to make it awake from its original state and make it more dynamic. I use it in 1.8mm on the backhand of a Stiga Allround with an M1 2.0mm on the forehand. Nice combination.

#13 — October 2014

Bluefire JP 03 is a very different rubber compared to Bluefire M3.

JP 03 has a softer, grippier topsheet than M3, but a slightly firmer sponge (the sponge pores are smaller and tighter than M3). JP 03 is less bouncy, more linear, lower throw, and less reactive to spin. JP 03 is very easy to use and fits many different play styles. It isn’t lightning fast, but it has quite an elastic effect in higher gears so the speed and spin are available if you put effort in.

For me, M3 is an all-out offensive soft rubber, and you get the best results if you avoid passive play. I still love it on my FH side. JP 03 is less focused and can satisfy a variety of needs, and it is my go-to BH rubber these days. It might lack a bit of pace overall for some, but that is the only downside I can think of.

#14 — May 2014

Agree with Mesiento86. This is a very good backhand rubber. It has an amazing block when used on a hard carbon blade.

However, it is not as good on the forehand without a booster.

#15 — April 2014

Very versatile rubber for your backhand. In my opinion, it is better with a fiber/carbon or a hard blade, rather than with wood blades.

Tested with Stratus Carbon and Clipper CR WRB (EXCELLENT!).

#16 — March 2014

Bluefire JP 03

Bluefire JP 03 is a significant upgrade from the Bluefire M3. While both rubbers feature similar sponge softness, the JP 03 exhibits superior topsheet grip. This enhanced grip contributes to a more precise and controlled looping experience, as the rubber effectively bites the ball.

In addition to its improved grip, the JP 03 boasts a more responsive feel. It offers a firmer sensation while looping, eliminating the excessive “squishiness” sometimes encountered with other rubbers. This improved feel promotes greater stability and precision in shot execution.

Moreover, the JP 03 demonstrates remarkable versatility in blade pairing. In extensive testing, it has proven to complement a wide range of blades more effectively than any other rubber. This adaptability makes it a suitable choice for players seeking a rubber that performs well with various blade setups. Specifically, it has been successfully paired with approximately 15 fast/spinny inverted rubber types and 11 mostly medium to hard blades.

#17 — Long Time Ago...

I had previously overrated this rubber. Its spin is not exceptionally great compared to others, but it excels in control. In my opinion, it’s a suitable starting rubber for the backhand, performing remarkably well in comparison to other options I’ve tried.

For beginners who struggle with XIOM Vega Euro, this rubber might be a more manageable alternative due to its direct playability and reduced flex. Similarly, those who find the Ten05FX bounce to be challenging can consider this rubber as a potential solution.

While it doesn’t generate as much spin as the Bluefire M series, it’s considerably easier to use. For players with good control and technique seeking an upgrade, the Ten05FX would be a superior choice.

Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.