Stiga Airoc Astro M

I got this rubber for super cheap, almost $20, and it is totally worth every cent. There’s no better option out there for that price. I play with a Timo Boll ALC (BH 1.9mm), and I found this rubber to be very spinny. Blocking feels amazing, and looping under-spin comes with ease.

However, I struggle a bit when playing short at the table since the rubber lacks some punch. I usually end up pushing the ball into the net. I believe this rubber is made for intermediate to advanced players, as the ball trajectory is not always consistent. You need to hit the ball with good technique to land it on your opponent’s side of the table.

I typically use tensor rubbers, which are far more consistent, but I found this one at a very low price, and I’m pleased with the quality so far. I recommend the softer versions of this rubber, as they help to increase control and consistency when hitting.

I don’t understand why Stiga stopped manufacturing this rubber series; I suspect it’s due to durability issues. In my case, after approximately 10 hours of training and playing, the rubber shows no signs of wear, unlike other rubbers from Xiom or Andro.

This is an excellent rubber for the backhand (Bh) in table tennis. It provides great control and spin, making it a preferred choice for players looking to enhance their game. Overall, it enhances performance and allows for more strategic shots during matches.

I recently came across a detailed review of a table tennis rubber on the forum. The review provides an in-depth analysis of the rubber’s performance and characteristics, making it a valuable resource for players looking to enhance their game.

The reviewer starts by discussing the rubber’s speed, noting that it offers excellent acceleration and control. This makes it suitable for players who want to execute fast-paced shots while maintaining precision. Additionally, the reviewer mentions that the rubber’s spin potential is impressive, allowing for heavy topspin serves and loops.

Another point highlighted in the review is the durability of the rubber. It appears to withstand wear and tear from regular play, which is often a concern for competitive players. The reviewer emphasizes that the longevity of the rubber contributes to its overall value.

Furthermore, the feel of the rubber is described as comfortable, providing a solid connection with the ball. This quality aids players in developing their strokes and improving their overall technique.

In conclusion, this table tennis rubber comes highly recommended by the reviewer. Its combination of speed, spin, durability, and comfort makes it a top choice for players of all levels. If you’re in the market for a new rubber, this review certainly suggests that this one is worth considering.

I recently had the opportunity to try out the new Stiga Airoc Astro, and I must say, I was pleasantly surprised by their performance from the very start. They felt faster and had more power compared to both the Airoc M and Airoc S.

I established a strong connection with the ball during my short serves and returns, which allowed me to maintain a high level of control. The rubber is medium-heavy, and the throw angle is medium-high.

So far, I have only played with them for two hours, but I plan to continue my review after I have completed more matches.