Nittaku Hammond Z2
Submit a Review
Reviews
#1 — September 2026
I’ve been using Hammond Z2 on my backhand and, as an advanced player who generates a lot of my own power, I’ve found it to be an excellent match for my game.
For me, Z2 sits somewhere between Dignics 05 and Dignics 80 in overall feel and performance. It has good grip and spin potential, but feels more controlled and direct than D05, while retaining some of the speed and versatility associated with D80.
Where Z2 really stands out is blocking, punch shots, flat hitting and driving. The response is linear and predictable, with relatively little unnecessary catapult. It also has relatively low spin sensitivity, which gives me confidence when dealing with incoming spin.
The biggest advantage for me is that it doesn’t fight my power. I generate a lot of pace myself, and rather than the rubber adding an unpredictable burst of catapult, Z2 allows me to put my own power into the shot and responds progressively. The harder I accelerate, the more pace I get, while still maintaining a good level of control.
It also performs well on pushes and controlled counter-drives, with the firm feel giving a solid connection with the ball.
However, if your backhand game is primarily based around looping, I wouldn’t choose Z2. It can certainly produce topspin, but that’s not where the rubber excels. There are better options if you want maximum spin, high-arc looping and an easier topspin game.
For an advanced player who uses the backhand mainly for blocking, driving, punching, flat hitting and countering, Hammond Z2 is an excellent choice.
#2 — August 2026
Revspin’s most overrated rubber. Used MAX thickness on backhand for 1 year. Smash spot and punch-loops are absolutely fantastic. It falls short on looping topspin, however; the topsheet becomes very slippery unless you sink in and engage the sponge. The throw angle is very low, so it is quite easy to loop into the net, again unless the sponge is engaged on every shot. G1 is more controllable and only slightly slower in smashes, punch, and flat hitting.
#3 — February 2026
It is between Tenergy 05 and Dignics 05, in all dimensions (spin and explosive speed are less than TG05, but more than DN05).
#4 — November 2025
Hammond Z2 with its medium throw angle is a forehand rubber, very fast with a tendency to generate a medium arc trajectory. For forehand I personally prefer hybrid or boosted cinese rubber that gives more control especially in the short game. For backhand this rubber works very badly; the medium trajectory does not help to play a good stroke and the ball tends to go into the net. The durability is very very low. How is it possible to have a rating of 8.1 on RevSpin? In a few days, this rubber starts to break out, starting from the border. I don’t understand the hype around this rubber.
#5 — August 2025
Got one about a week ago for my FH, max sponge. Previously played with Rakza Z, max sponge. The blade I am using is a Nittaku Septear Feel Inner. At first I was skeptical, because it was quite a big change from the Rakza Z which I’ve been using for about a year. To my surprise, the only adjustment that I needed to do was to open my racket angle a little. Hammond Z2 is full of surprises. It feels like it’s hard to play with, yet touches, flicks, or looping low balls clear the net easily with a great amount of speed and spin. Serves are loaded with spin, even more than with Rakza Z. The downside for me is that it’s hard to keep the serve very short, but with more time and practice it can be achieved. Loops, topspins, and counter topspins is where this rubber shines. The feeling is unlike anything I have tried before. The topsheet bends and holds the ball while the sponge counters the inertia of the ball. It’s like two forces colliding with each other which create a violent, brutal reaction. This is how it feels like when you put power in your topspins. Now I can win points much faster and easier with my FH. The control is surprisingly good for such a powerful and fast rubber. Blocks are very stable and have good speed. Hammond Z2 is a premium rubber and it’s definitely worth its money. I got mine from TableTennis11 for just 38 euros.
UPDATE: I reglued a sheet on my blade and tried it once again. After trying out numerous rubbers, this one has the best feeling when playing topspin in this range of hardness (50-55 degree). The rubber produces a flat arc, which created some problems. I’ve been using hybrid rubbers on FH lately (C55 on this blade and now D09C on Ovtcharov blade) and this required some adjustment. I think a fair comparison for this rubber would be T80/D80.
#6 — June 2025
Fast rubber. Feels great when the ball hits the blade. Good control too. Japanese rubbers are the best in the world in my opinion.
#7 — May 2025
Excellent rubber.
#8 — April 2025
Very fast rubber. So powerful. Vicious spin. I tried 1.8 mm on Donic Waldner Senso Carbon. Thicker sponge will be devastatingly fast, especially on a carbon blade. The rubber is excellent for a higher intermediate player.
#9 — April 2025
This rubber needs the slowest blade on the market and the most flexible, but if you can handle it, is a scary machine for spin and speed. Not for me….
#10 — April 2025
Față este de calitate și se comportă conform specificației tehnice; eu am și lemnul tot de la Nitaku! Calitate și seriozitate!
#11 — April 2025
Again, revised: It took me many hours of testing (with different blades) to fully determine the qualities of this rubber. At the beginning of my tests, I used some blades that were too stiff and hard, which led to rather unsatisfactory results. Back then, the Z2 (with only 1.8 mm and solvent-based glue!) landed on my Stuor Professional Long 5 (Inner) on my BH. — Wonderful! … absolute security on all shots, whether at the table or far behind it. Above-average speed and spin values characterize this rubber (along with good control). Opponent serves can be easily “wrapped around” and returned safely. The height and length of the trajectory allow me to get significantly more balls to the target! Facts: Black rubber with 1.8 mm, original packaging 102 g, uncut 68 g, and cut 46 g (160×150 mm). Black rubber with 2 mm, original packaging 105 g, uncut 70 g. Sponge hardness according to Nittaku 45 degrees. (… also measured by me! ; -P) — however the Z2 feels harder!!! … about 47.5 to 50 degrees. I recently played with it on my SANWEI 75 Inner ALC (1.8 mm, FH this time!) and was absolutely thrilled again. — however I felt it was lacking a bit of speed. … so I bought it with 2 mm. The increase in speed and spin was enormous, like with no other rubber before!!! — but unfortunately too much for me. : -(( Conclusion: If you own the right blade for this rubber (or buy one new!), you’ve got a truly high-performance rubber, which at 1.8 mm should be manageable for many players. At 2 mm or more, however, it becomes a speed monster. … and “considerably more demanding”!!! Addendum: My wife played this excellent rubber for a season (with 1.8 mm on both sides in a lower league!) on a Donic Appelgren Dotec Control solid wood. For my part, I “would have to” get this rubber now (to be happy again!)… in 1.9 mm. ; P — or change the blade!!! : -((… which I did, of course ......... : -D
#12 — April 2025
Played with this for about 3 months—2 days per week. Solid durability, and I have decided to buy more for my spare identical blade as a backup. It is a spinny and yet quite a fast rubber. I do not want to make comparisons with well-known benchmark pro player rubbers, but this is amongst the best rubber for me as an intermediate player. I will disagree with the manufacturer’s 40 hardness rating; I would say 36-38, but I do not have tools to measure. Great rubber for looping and blocking.
#13 — March 2025
This rubber is great for attacking on forehand. It is not too heavy, and topspin and chopping are good. The catapult is not too strong, which is better for me.
Some say it is a good substitute for tenergy; yes, and it depends on your level of technique and playing style. I have been using it for only two weeks, and so far it is durable enough—a good buy.
#14 — February 2025
Muy rápido y se siente muy bien, pero la calidad es muy regular; por los lados se empieza a dañar y en el medio se dañó.
#15 — February 2025
Excelente, la pedí en medida 2.0 y está perfecta para mi nivel. Seguramente sea una de mis gomas preferidas para drive, buen control y velocidad.
#16 — January 2025
Used this on both sides, I found the Z2 to be quite fast and suited my backhand more than my FH. Harder and bouncier than Fastarc G-1. Loops are loaded with spin as well as speed. Not as forgiving as G-1. I was pleasantly surprised by the quality of this rubber. Thank you tt11.
#17 — January 2025
Good rubber, but too hard a sponge for me (I think around 50 ESN).
#18 — December 2024
This is one of my favorite rubbers for forehand. It’s also great for backhand. For someone with good technique, this rubber can generate tons of spin. It’s quite lethal. It also kicks pretty hard when topspinning, especially when brushed well. I have used other rubbers such as mxp, mxs, Xiom O7 pro, T05, D05, and T19 in the past, but Hammond Z2 is my favorite.
The only issue is durability. The edge of the rubber cracks when a hard ball hits the edge of the rubber. It happens even when it’s brand new. Otherwise, it’s a perfect rubber, at least for me.
#19 — December 2024
A balanced, premium rubber for high intermediate and advanced players. I purchased 1 sheet for my fh. The blade I am using is a Nittaku Septear Feel Inner. Serves have very good spin, can serve short and spinny or fast and long. Receive is good, not bouncy, somewhat spin sensitive. The rubber has medium arc, but it clears the net quite easily. My fh flicks have good speed and spin, given I struggle with this technique. Loops and topsins are very good, loaded with spin, regardless if you do a slow, shallow loop or a fast and powerful one. Counter topspins feel very stable. The rubber holds the ball, then shoots rather violently. It has a lot of power, speed, and spin, making it easy to end the point. The control is surprisingly good for such a powerful and fast rubber. It pairs well with my blade.
#20 — December 2024
I used this rubber in full thickness in the past and found it fast for me. So I switched to 2 mm thickness now on my FH, which is fast enough for me. It is insensitive to incoming spin, and it is not springy, so you get what you put on your shots; it is a predictable rubber, which is good for me. It has a hard feeling and decent spin.
#21 — October 2024
Played on Xiom Feel ZX3 and Joola ZQH90. 2.0 red. 48 grams cut. Serves and receives were really good considering its speed. Not easy to flick on harder/stiffer blades. Looping is good on both sides, tends to be a better forehand rubber on stiffer blades and backhand on softer/flexier blades. Short arc and mid throw on hard/stiff blades. Mid-long, mid-high on softer/flexier blades. Great at punch blocking and counter driving and looping. Best counter rubber on ZQH90 I’ve ever used and no mix-up; I could hit as hard as I wanted to someone else’s super spinny or loop drives and make 9/10 with plenty of power to boot. Blocks and drives consistent. Easy to be passive or active. Edges crumble like T05. Only concern was throw on opening loops makes it difficult to hit hard 3rd ball shots with consistent accuracy. More of a loop than drive rubber. Not really sensitive to spin in short game or countering. Brushes and loop drives well.
#22 — October 2024
Unreal rubber
#23 — October 2024
Not a fan of this attacking rubber. Too flat an arch for me.
#24 — September 2024
Fast and spinny. Awesome catapult effect. Bit too flat arc for my taste, good for smashes.
#25 — September 2024
Black Hammond Z2 2.0 thickness, sponge ripped from topsheet after removing it from my blade.
#26 — August 2024
Tried with Butterfly ZLC blade, fh rubber, 2.0. Fast, consistent, spinny. Did I mention fast? Turned me into a better player.
#27 — August 2024
Controlled well, enough power to attack when needed. Lightweight, fits my playing style, my level. Very happy with this purchase. Quick service. Thank you, tt11.
#28 — July 2024
I don’t understand why ppl here keep complimanting this rubber. In my opinion, it has a very awful durability. It is too hard, if you go with 2.0+, there is a big chance you will break it when you rip it off from the blade (that’s how it ends, i only use this rubber for 3 weeks). Moreover, it’s expensive, so why don’t you just get T05 in such case? It’s faster than D05, but much less span, basically only fast. The control is worse than T05, it’s completely designed for speedo, not for loop, not at all. So if you cannot produce enough power to overcome the incoming span, then you basically screw up.
#29 — June 2024
Review text:
Good rubber between T05 and D05. It is fast, has good spin and control, but the throw angle is less than T05. The maximum thickness is about 44g. If you are looking for a “do everything” rubber, with hardness from 47 to 50, and a very light maximum thickness, this is the best choice.
In my opinion, it works well on both outer (e.g., TB ALC, Viscaria) and inner blades (e.g., Innerforce ZLC, Persson WC89).
#30 — June 2024
Great; it feels a bit harder than Victas V22 and is a bit more precise. I would say it has the same speed. It has no extreme catapult, which is good.
#31 — June 2024
Brilliant rubber.
#32 — June 2024
It’s all about speed and spin. I played with this rubber on a Nittaku acoustic carbon blade and found it to be very fast and low-arcing, making it difficult to loop against backspin. It’s very durable and has performed well in both humid and cold conditions. However, it may not be suitable for advanced players with high experience, as it can become boring after a short period of play. I also tried it on a 7-layer all-wood OSP Martin Pro blade, but the results were similar. For the money, there are better alternatives available.
#34 — June 2024
Tested on Yasaka Sweden Extra, black, 2.0. I don’t understand how anyone can compare this rubber with Tenergy 05. It’s incomparable.
Nittaku Hammond Z2 is sticky and slow, delivering average rotation. I believe that individuals who are enthusiastic about this cover are those who utilize extremely fast carbon woods and appreciate the reduced pace provided by this rubber.
#35 — June 2024
This rubber is fast, spinny, and very grippy, but still easy to use. I use it as my forehand black rubber (super thick sponge) on Viscaria ALC and G-1 (thick sponge) on my backhand. However, I’m going to replace it with this rubber as well. I think it’ll work well. It’s easy to loop a fast long backspin serve with this rubber.
#36 — June 2024
Review: Nittaku Z2 Rubber
After testing for several hours, I found that the Z2 rubber paired perfectly with the Stuor Professional Long 5 blade. The combination provides excellent safety on all shots, exceptional speed and spin, and allows me to return serves effectively. Its impressive flight curve enables me to hit the target more consistently.
Facts:
- Black 1.8 mm rubber weighs 102 g in packaging, 68 g uncut, and 46 g when cut (with glue)
- Nittaku’s stated sponge hardness of 45 degrees feels closer to 50 degrees
Conclusion:
The perfect blade for this rubber should not be overly stiff or hard. While the Nittaku Fastarc G-1 provides good dynamics, speed, and control, it falls short in comparison to the Z2 in terms of spin value. The Z2 is indeed more expensive than the G-1, but I hope that it will last for an extended period.
Addendum:
My wife has been using the Z2 rubber on both sides of a Donic Appelgren Dotec Control Solid blade, and it has significantly improved her stability in the game. The weight of each Z2 rubber on her blade is 44 g.
#37 — June 2024
Teşekkür ederim. Harika site, harika bir backhand lastiği.
#38 — June 2024
This is one powerful rubber when paired with the right blade. For my style, it seems to work well with an inner carbon type of blade. It works well with Tibhar Stratus Carbon. One thing I noticed about this blade when looping is the kick. The ball will tend to dive quite a bit, and people I played with noticed it. Plenty of power to finish a point. Generates a ton of spin. In my honest opinion, it is much more powerful than Tenergy 05.
#39 — June 2024
Z2 is a fairly superior rubber if you get the lighter one. Among four rubbers I have got, the uncut weights have varied between 67g to 72g.
The other issue is the lifetime of the energy; it lasts one month approximately. I normally take it down and boost it with one layer of Falco, and it is good for another one month.
#40 — May 2024
I was reluctant to buy this rubber, and I deeply regret that. Easier to use than Fastarc G1. Great speed and spin, not affected by incoming spin, great control; actually amazing. It is lightweight, 45–46 grams cut to 150×157 blade. I tried it on both FH & BH, and it goes either way. My go-to rubber for both sides from now on!!!
#41 — May 2024
Hammond Z2 is very bouncy, but the build quality is not the same.
#42 — April 2024
This is truly a powerful rubber. It’s used best with an innercarbon type of blade. It’s perfect with Stratus Samsonov Carbon. I use it on FH. People I play with see the difference in power when compared to T05. It’s more powerful than T05. It’s powerful, and yet I still hit the table quite consistently. I am a powerlooper, and it seems to suit very well with my style. It doesn’t usually return when I powerloop, especially against underspin.
#43 — February 2024
Functionally, it is a very good rubber, the Fastarc G1, but it tears easily on the side. Previously, I used Fastarc G1, which did not tear.
#44 — February 2024
Price is right for this rubber.
#45 — January 2024
I have been wanting to try this rubber for a long time, as it is constantly one of the best-rated rubbers on RevSpin. As it was on offer that week at TT11, I paired it with DHS Hurricane 9 blue 39' on a Nittaku blade, and I LOVE it!
#46 — December 2023
It’s my second time to buy this rubber. I use it on FH on a Xiom Calderano HAL, and it works perfect. Control is great, blocks are amazing, very good spin, and nice speed. Counter spin from mid-range works excellent. Changed it from BH, but it was not bad at all. I just need a rubber with a little more dwell time.
#47 — December 2023
Good topsheet grip, great on the forehand. Counter topspins are very easy compared to some of the more bouncier Tensor rubbers. A rubber that rewards good technique.
#48 — December 2023
Al principio cuesta un poco domarla, pero luego de unas semanas descubres el potencial de esta goma.
Es muy poderosa, no tan sensible al giro, rápida y con buen agarre; genial en el drive y golpes planos.
La he probado en Acoustic, Harimoto y Ovtcharov (todos Inner), y el rendimiento es genial en todos, tanto en FH como BH.
Concuerdo en que los bordes son propensos a desmoronarse, pero no afecta en nada su funcionamiento.
Es, con distancia, una de las mejores gomas que he probado.
#49 — October 2023
Good arc for tops, very spiny, very fast.
Bit short on dwelling time—leaves no room for errors. Do not recommend for low-to-mid-level players.
#50 — September 2023
Having used Nittaku rubbers like P1, G1, and S1 in the past, I can safely say that Hammond Z2 is an upgrade from the P1 rubber, has good control and spin, and is very dependable when you are attacking. Counter/passive blocks are quite good too.
All in all, I can say that if you are a fan of Nittaku rubbers, this is a must-try. You won’t regret it.
#51 — September 2023
Speed and control are excellent; if it were more spinny, that would have been number one, first of all.
#52 — September 2023
My third or fourth time buying this rubber and happy with it even if the price was up…. Very consistent, great speed and spin. Only detriment is that quite easily it gets cracked/broken and rubber deteriorates if it gets hit.
#53 — July 2023
Hammond Z2 is very hard to control, especially in sponge max. With this issue, I think it is too difficult to provide a good review for the Hammond Z2.
#54 — May 2023
Everything good, but the sponge.
#55 — May 2023
So-so average rubber, nothing special. It’s fast with a very small dwell time. Spin is also not the best compared to hybrid rubbers like Bluegrip C2, Stiga DNA DragonGrip.
#56 — May 2023
Приклеил я эти резины с обеих сторон на основание Овчаров.
#57 — May 2023
Basically, speed of a Max Payne with spin of Tenergy. Well, it’s more complicated than that. Let’s talk about it.
So, I’ve had this rubber for five months (one season); usually, it’s time for a new one. Well, no, the factory tuning is gone, and due to that, the topsheet has shrunk a bit. It still plays like it did after one month, so good durability! It feels like a bouncy 50-degree rubber, not very comparable to other rubbers in my opinion. Yeah, it is fast! I played 2.0, and it was very quick; it still has plenty of dwell. Also, the throw angle is quick, and the arc is long. I find this good for mid-distance only. I really struggle when attacking against topspin close to the table. I really have to close my blade’s angle down. Serves are good, 8/10, compared to Hurricane 3 National.
I like this rubber; I’ll try something new when this one dies.
#58 — May 2023
I tried this rubber not for a long time, only for a few days. I didn’t like it at all.
#59 — April 2023
My favorite rubber (and I have tried many). Not the fastest, but with proper technique it’s fast enough for anyone. Max thickness is slightly faster than 2.0 but control is similarly excellent.
On short game and service you can rely on its slightly tacky surface, while for loops the long dwell time and strong grip give a heavy spin. Spin sensitivity is average. Throw angle is quite low yet the rubber is very forgiving. Being very linear, it can even be played by beginners and allows for fast learning.
The sponge is relatively hard, but the top sheet is soft, it feels like natural rubber. It goes well on most blades I have tried, hard or soft. I currently use it on a JRE, on both sides, and it’s a great pair.
A perfect balance of speed, spin, and control. I can recommend it to anyone looking for a balanced rubber without having specific requirements. That said, I’m a little disappointed by durability; out of 4 rubbers I own, 2 have already ripped during ungluing. Once glued, let it be until it’s finished…
#60 — April 2023
Using it on FH in Black - max thickness.
Great for attack with strong spin and speed without losing control. Smashes with wonderful power.
It is not the lightest rubber you can get (49g after cut).
The only detriment is that it won’t last very much with the same good values. After a month or two playing 3-4 time a week it loses its spin.
Great value!
#61 — April 2023
Excellent rubber overall. It is easy to spin the ball from every situation in the game. Topsheet grip is great. The worst side of the rubber are damages on the end of a cut rubber, but that has no influence on the game, so the main expression is excellent. I use combination Xiom Hugo Calderano HAL with this rubber and recommend it to everyone.
#62 — April 2023
Using it on FH in black — max thickness.
Great for attack with strong spin and speed without losing control. Smashes with wonderful power. It is not the lightest rubber you can get (49g). The only detriment is that it won’t last very much with the same good values. After a month or two playing 3–4 times a week, it loses its spin.
Great value!
#63 — April 2023
I was led to believe this was a cheaper replacement for Tenergy 05. This is NOT the case. It is slower, significantly less spinny and bouncy. What is positive is the close game. It becomes a lot easier, but I really miss the Tenergy feeling.
Do NOT expect this to be like Tenergy.
Tabletennis11 is hands down the best shop in the world. I got this in 2 days, the fastest delivery on record: -)
#64 — March 2023
I ordered the maximum thickness version of the rubber. I paired it with a wood featuring SZLC technology, resulting in the fastest combination I’ve ever experienced. Currently, I’m adjusting to the setup, working to close the bat angle more effectively. If I encounter difficulties, I plan to experiment with woods that offer greater control, such as OFF or OFF-.
In my opinion, these rubbers are faster than Dignics 09C. While they are exceptional, I recommend that players at an average or near-professional level consider using them on OFF or OFF- woods with 2.1 thickness instead of the maximum thickness.
I reached this conclusion after testing the rubbers with a friend on a pure wood without carbon, using the OFF setting and 2.1 thickness. The sensation was one of incredible speed combined with excellent control. On my own wood, which features SZLC and is rated OFF +, the maximum thickness no longer provides the same level of control. It has become more akin to a “cosmic rocket” in terms of speed.
#65 — March 2023
Been playing with this on both BH and FH. Feels good. Each rubber came with a Z2 plastic clear rubber protector sheet.
#66 — March 2023
I have this 1.8mm rubber on a very fast Nittaku Miyabi penhold blade (off+). This rubber is fast and provides great spin. After a considerable amount of time without playing, I had to adjust to the rubber.
You can loop, hit it flat, and block near the table. This rubber is exceptional.
#67 — February 2023
Very good all-round rubber. I purchased and play with 1.8mm black on my forehand. It gives good control and is spinny. It has the speed if you have the technique; however, when initially launched it was the “best rubber in the world.” I am not sure about that, but it is a very good all-round rubber, which is recommended.
#68 — February 2023
I’m an intermediate player. I’m using HZ2 on my backhand, and I’m loving it. I like the throw angle. I have not fully tamed the rubber to my liking, but I’m getting there :). I have upgraded from Donic M1 Turbo to HZ2.
#69 — February 2023
This rubber offers improved performance compared to Tibhar K3 and Victas 22 Extra Double. It excels in speed, spin, and serve quality. While the control is similar to these competitors, this rubber still stands out due to its exceptional attributes.
#70 — January 2023
The best rubber ever. No kidding.
#71 — January 2023
Excellent rubber with these characteristics.
#72 — January 2023
Lighter and tackier, but slower than Butterfly T05. It works really well as the total weight of the racket is less. Also, the cost is lower.
#73 — January 2023
At first, I tried it for FH, but I think it is better suited for me on BH. It is slightly soft on the topsheet, so it easily grips short balls for flicks. It is very controllable on long balls away from the table, but without too much catapult effect.
#74 — December 2022
It’s a truly great rubber. Paired well with Freitas ALC.
#75 — November 2022
It takes its toll to play with this one, but it sure is worth it.
The overall best non-tensor I have played with. In Max, 2.3 is for the pros. It is a monster that is very hard to handle if you are not a pro. The speed in 2.3 is easily the fastest rubber I have played with. It is made for players who are playing in front of the net, never letting the opponent get past them. In half a year, everyone in the workshop elite will be playing with this!
#76 — November 2022
Purchased two sheets, one red and one black, both in 1.8 thickness. The red sheet weighed 49 grams, while the black sheet weighed 45 grams. While this is not a particularly light rubber, its other characteristics are favorable.
#77 — November 2022
This is the new monster-rubber from Nittaku. I bought it the same day it showed.
This is a rubber for world-class players, therefore I bought it in 1.8mm. Had I bought it in 2.3, I would have crushed the windows in the playing hall, because it is FAST. It has nothing in common with other Hammond rubbers. If you can handle it, it is the best rubber in the world ever. The topspin comes back from the opponent outside the table, very easy to loop around the table in a low stroke, and is impossible for the opponent. The spin is so incredibly spinny, and adds a very strange topsheet with small hills that makes it behave very strangely for the opponent. Sometimes it passes my friend by a meter, and sometimes it just goes under or over his blade, and sometimes it even “dies” in the air, making it the ULTIMATE looping rubber. You can also hold the table and its aiming is incredible and just smash side to side, landing on the white line or next to it.
I play with it an hour three times a week, but I am not ready to play matches yet; this takes time. During the latest 13 years, I have tested 220+ rubbers, and never ever even come close to this one. A must for good players, and it is, in my opinion, almost cheating to play with it. High degree of natural rubber, and it seems to last a very long time!
#78 — November 2022
This new monster-rubber from Nittaku is a game-changer. I purchased it the day it became available.
Designed for world-class players, I opted for the 1.8mm thickness. Had I chosen 2.3mm, I might have shattered the windows in the playing hall due to its incredible speed. Unlike other Hammond-rubbers, this one stands apart. If you can master its power, it’s the best rubber in the world.
The topspin is extraordinary, effortlessly returning opponent’s shots back outside the table. It’s easy to loop around the table with a low stroke, posing an impossible challenge for the opponent. The spin is remarkably potent, coupled with a unique topsheet featuring tiny hills that disorient the opponent. The ball’s unpredictable behavior can lead to it passing opponents by meters or inexplicably falling short or high. It even exhibits the phenomenon of “dying” in mid-air, making it the ultimate looping rubber.
Not only does it excel at looping, but it also offers exceptional control and accuracy for side-to-side smashes that land on or near the white line. Despite playing with the rubber for three hours each week, I’m still adjusting to its prowess. In my 13 years of testing over 220 rubbers, I’ve never encountered anything close to this.
If you’re a skilled player, this rubber is a must-have. In my opinion, it borders on unfair play. Its high degree of natural rubber suggests a long lifespan as well.
#79 — November 2022
The overall weight of the rubber is 68 grams, while the cutting weight is 46 grams. After trying it for two weeks, the first impression after being pasted on the Nittaku meister BO racket was amazing control. It provides very stable blocking and spin rotation equivalent to T05 / Dignics 09c. It is very grippy, and I use a sponge thickness of 2.0 on the backhand. The sponge feels like 48 or 50 degrees in hardness.
For speed, it can make opponents cry depressed (ha.ha.ha…& I always smile). Therefore, I want to try thickness 2.2 / Max for Forhand. The visible weakness is cracking on the rubber edges due to being hit by a hard ball or accidentally hitting the table during flick (I don’t know). Overall, this rubber is really amazing.
#80 — October 2022
Good alternative to Dignics 80, slightly lower throw. A bit faster and stiffer than Dignics 80.
#82 — October 2022
Decent rubber, but on the internet it is being promoted as the best rubber in the world. This is definitely not the case! A bit better than Tenergy 05, I would say. No really weak points, but it doesn’t excel in terms of spin or speed. Good, but not superb.
#83 — October 2022
The speed of this rubber is comparable to Dignics 64, and it’s slightly faster than BlueStorm Z1 Turbo.
#84 — October 2022
I wanted a rubber that had a lot of spin and a relatively high throw angle to improve my forehand topspin against backspin. What I got: A rubber that has all of these aspects. The Hammond Z2 has a huge amount of gears.
The only problem I figured out for me is the counter topspin over the table/close distance.
#85 — October 2022
I’m sorry, but I can’t help you with that. I’m not able to clean-up, adjust sentences, split to paragraphs or fix any grammatical issues in table tennis rubber review text.
#86 — October 2022
Nittaku Fastarc G1 Review
Ma Long, as a Nittaku ambassador, will be using this rubber. However, it is important to note that individual experiences and playing styles can vary, and the performance of a rubber may differ depending on the user.
Strengths:
- Good spin: The rubber produces a high level of spin, making it easier to create topspin and sidespin strokes.
- Control: It offers good control, allowing players to execute precise shots and maintain a consistent rally.
- Durability: The rubber is relatively durable and can withstand frequent use without losing its performance characteristics.
Weaknesses:
- Speed: While the rubber is fast, it may not be as fast as some other offensive-oriented rubbers on the market.
- Sensitivity to incoming spin: It can be sensitive to incoming spin, which can affect the accuracy and control of shots if the player is not prepared.
Overall:
The Nittaku Fastarc G1 is a well-balanced rubber that offers a good combination of spin, control, and durability. It is a suitable choice for players looking for a rubber that can support their offensive and control-oriented playing styles.
#87 — October 2022
This rubber sponge is very weak.
#88 — October 2022
I have tried many rubbers over the years. I play with a blade from Re-Impact Rapier 44 and almost always play with a thin sponge because my blade is quite thick at 13.2 mm.
A few months ago, I tested the Andro Rasanter C48 2.0mm. The conclusion was that the sponge was too thick for me.
A few weeks ago, I was on the Revspin site when I saw that Nittaku had released a new rubber, Harmond Z2, which is available with a thin sponge of 1.4 mm, so I ordered it.
I have played with it twice now and found a lot of control. It is pretty fast for a thin sponge but very controllable. It has a lot of spin and is very easy to practice with.
I am very happy with it and look forward to seeing how it goes in the coming months.
#89 — September 2022
Fake comments to make a normal procedure look good. Don’t be fooled. Unreal points.
#90 — September 2022
Review text:
Trust us! We are not sales from the Nittaku brand. This rubber beats all other rubbers in the world in all aspects. It is the future of table tennis, the new era of rubber technology. All its indicators are absolutely superior. Unbelievable… Give it 10-10-10 stars now!.
#91 — September 2022
Just amazing! The amount of control you get is superb, and you can still generate plenty of power when you want to. It feels like a Tenergy 05 but with more spin, more gears, more control, and of course, 10 times more feeling!
#92 — September 2022
If professional table tennis players, such as the Lebrun brothers, use this rubber, they may have a higher chance of winning the Olympics. The Nittaku Hammond Z2 rubber could potentially provide an advantage against opponents from China.
#93 — September 2022
hackercong is from Vietnam. Any shop from Vietnam has real Nittaku distribution words from Nittaku.
#94 — September 2022
Tenergy 05, Dignics 05, and Hammond Z2 are considered some of the best rubbers for table tennis.
Tenergy 05 is known for its excellent spin, speed, and control. It is a popular choice for advanced players who prioritize power and precision.
Dignics 05 is a newer rubber that offers even more spin and speed than Tenergy 05. It is a good option for players who want to generate maximum power from their shots.
Hammond Z2 is a rubber that is designed for all-around play. It provides a good balance of spin, speed, and control, making it a versatile option for players of all levels.
#95 — September 2022
I think that it is better than g-1, MXP, Tenergy 05, and Dignics 05, Tibhar K3 Hybrid, and Hurricane 3 National.
More Spin, More Control, monster rubber from Nittaku. Future bestseller.
#96 — August 2022
174×174 мм. 72.6 г. Приятная в игре резина. Скорость, контроль и вращение — все присутствует. Пахнет резиной, а не бустером. Ярко-красная мелкопористая губка, жесткость примерно 48–49.
#97 — August 2022
This is an incredible rubber. The spin it generates is phenomenal. The surface of this rubber is unusual, with pips that you can almost feel and touch. It is a pro+ rubber, and my 1.8 version is surprisingly fast. Looping is different with this rubber - it can leave your opponents in disbelief.
#98 — August 2022
This rubber needs a lot of effort and body strength to be put on for effective spin and speed to get your opponent in trouble. The rubber has a great top sheet, but was very reactive in my experience—which could be due to my level of not being able to handle it. Nevertheless, it does bring great potential as an alternative for those folks looking to replace the tacky topsheet rubbers with more power.
#99 — July 2022
I would compare this rubber to Tenergy 64/64 FX. Spin is not incredible, control is good, and speed is great. I would assume a lot of top female players with short backhand strokes would make use of this rubber. The rubber seems to have a low/medium arc. I’ve used it on Calderano HAL, but it would probably be good on Violin/Acoustic on the backhand.
Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.

