Butterfly Rozena

Rozena is an excellent backhand rubber when paired with Butterfly ALC blades (I have ZJK ALC). Medium hardness is around 45 degrees ESN. Throw angle is medium, which is perfect for backhand.

People say Rozena doesn’t have much spin, but my opponents always tell me my backhand drive is very spinny, so it comes down to technique. Of course, it has less spin than Tenergy and Dignics though.

Great control, including in short game. This is the perfect backhand rubber for me. The only negative is the durability: topsheet loses grip starting at Month 2, which is similar to German rubbers.

Esta goma ofrece una excelente relación calidad-precio. Permite un buen control sin renunciar a la velocidad, lo que la hace ideal para el revés o el golpe de derecha si eres un jugador de nivel intermedio o ligeramente superior. Sin embargo, no es recomendable si buscas una velocidad muy alta. Por el contrario, es una opción muy buena si priorizas el control y la rotación.

Played with Rosena on my Timo Boll ALC for more than a year on my BH side. It’s advertised and spoken of as a more controllable alternative to Tenergy. While it has some similarities to Tenergy, it doesn’t compare. Tenergy has far more gears and catapult effect. If you’re used to Tenergy, this may feel like a downgrade. However, it offers more control if you find Tenergy too fast.

Short game, blocking, and spins at the table and mid-range are effortless. It’s a good rubber in its own class. This rubber is an excellent choice for intermediate players looking to up their game.

Starters beware, this is still a fast rubber. The rubber’s qualities fade quickly as it wears down. Other rubbers retain their qualities a bit longer, especially spin, and opponents will hit through it easily. So be prepared to replace it when you feel it wears down.

Rozena makes me feel secure and safe when playing. I used Reactor Tornado for my forehand and backhand side before, then changed my backhand to Rozena 2.1mm.

This rubber brings out the beast of my backhand attacks and blocks. I tried it on my forehand and now I want to change my backhand to Rozena too. It requires less effort but is powerful. All my strokes came in on the opponent’s table.

Blade: Yinhe Y13

Update 2023

As of now, I’m still using Rozena, but on a different blade. I found the Y13 a little bit weak, so I’ve changed to the Yinhe Pro 01, a Viscaria clone, and I think its performance and feeling are better than Viscaria.

My forehand is Battle 2 Prov. I’ve tried Rozena Black 2.1 on my forehand, but it didn’t suit my style, it always flies. So now I’m back to Battle 2.

But on the backhand, Rozena is a monster. It gives additional spin from the opponent’s spin. It is good in receiving, serving, blocking, punching, pushing, and controlling. In my opinion, it’s a perfect all-round rubber on an ALC blade.

I think if I switch from Rozena to Tenergy, that would be a big difference and difficult, so I’ll stay with Rozena. Most of my points come from my backhand side. I’m a backhand dominant player.

I used it on my backhand. It was very controllable and performed well in every aspect. However, as I improved, I felt that this rubber was not allowing me to use my full potential on the backhand. Other rubbers were simply more difficult for my opponents to play against.

Všechny recenze kromě jedné jsou kladné, bohužel i když jsem od tohoto potahu čekal více po recenzích. Zkoušel jsem na prknech ALC.s Butterfly a ALC -Timo Boll. Potřeboval jsem pro mou univerzální hru (pink, blok, obrana, útok) méně rychlou gumu než je T 05, T 64, T 80. Tato guma je rychlá, míčky padaly ze stolu, menší kontrola, nakonec jsem použil T 19, která mně vyhovuje nejvíce (vysoká kontrola, trochu pomalejší než T 05, lze hrát na obou stranách, při čopu často škodí soupeři). Určitě není vhodná pro rychlá dřeva. Chcete-li vyváženost (rychlost, kontrola) je lepší T 19, T 80, Dignics 05, 80, 09C…

Butterfly Rozena

The Butterfly Rozena features a soft top sheet that resembles the T05 and a springy sponge that is slightly softer. Its speed surpasses that of the T05 and even the T80.

Playing with the Rozena feels like unleashing an attacking beast. It delivers fast, straight shots with minimal spin but remarkable speed. The throw angle is lower than that of the Tenergy series, resulting in a linear shot trajectory. Power shots barely clear the net.

Backhand flicks are effortless and quick, while counter loops are outstanding. Looping heavy underspin requires significant effort, but when executed correctly, it produces exceptional topspin balls that barely clear the net at high speeds.

Despite its preference for hard, flat strokes, the Rozena handles looping well and is not inadequate for chopping. It exhibits less sensitivity to incoming spin compared to the Tenergy series and requires more effort to generate spin. However, the power it provides makes spin less crucial.

Overall, the Butterfly Rozena is an excellent rubber for both backhand and forehand play.

It is still far from Tenergy in terms of performance, but it’s cheaper. The overlay is perfect for training and for amateurs. Plus - has average speed, rotation and control. Minus - not very durable, soft sponge (not suitable for plywood).

In my opinion, Rozena is a great choice for your backhand due to its ample speed and exceptional control. I personally use it on my Matador blade for Reverse Penhold Backhand (RPB). I often recommend it to my friends. It is a high-quality product from Butterfly at a reasonable price.

I changed my FH rubber to Rozena red 2.1mm after previously using Xiom Vega Pro and Omega 4 Pro. I had become increasingly BH dominant and BH dependent to score points. My FH had become erratic and was losing its offensive edge. There is nothing wrong with Xiom rubbers! They are terrific! It was a psychological thing that I had to deal with, and I was looking for a different rubber feel.

I put the Rozena on Nittaku Latika (shakehand). At the first session, I disliked the feeling! But then, I was looking for something different! From session 3 onwards, I started liking it.

The topsheet is grippy, does not slip even in humid weather, and produces a good amount of spin. It is not too soft nor hard. The rubber can lift backspin effectively, pushes, flips, blocks, drives, and loops well. Hitting together with spinning the ball feels better than merely doing a pure flat hit. My FH confidence in both the short game and away from the table is being rebuilt. Bonus: correctly contacted, the rubber hisses off a nice “poof”! For me, an important feedback on the quality of my stroke. I suppose a different rubber feel plus attention to rehabilitating other aspects of technique all add into the equation! Thank you for reading!

Update: I switched the Rozena to BH of my Yinhe V14 Pro. I love it for the ball grip, the moderate catapult, and the speed. BH attacks over the table and counter-hitting away from the table are great! For me, this rubber feels better on the BH…

Very good. I use it on my FH, and it allows my shot to hit with a large margin for error. A good amount of spin, definitely not slow, so overall, it’s a good rubber.

I have been using this rubber for the past 9 months (03/2020 - 12/2020) and have found that this is an excellent rubber to learn and develop mechanics, ball feel, and control.

This rubber is relatively linear and will give back what you put into it.

This rubber is also very stable and forgiving as it has good dwell allowing you to feel and manipulate the ball and is not as affected by incoming spin.

I did not like this rubber for anything else than blocking. Blocking is pretty automatic like with T05, but when you start to apply your own power, it’s bouncier than Tenergry rubbers. It only suited me for backhand blocking.

This is a great rubber for alc blades.

I was using it on both sides. For forehand, I found the control to be insufficient when the ball didn’t hit the blade center. Additionally, the throw angle was too low, making it challenging to execute a consistent forehand loop against heavy down spins. It’s worth noting that my previous rubber was Vega Pro.

On the backhand, it proved to be reliable, delivering accurate blocks and loops. This rubber offers good value for the price and performs well on the backhand. However, I strongly advise against using it on the forehand if you are an aggressive player looking for a stable and powerful loop.

Before the Covid-19 pandemic, I changed to a Rozena max on my Taksim ALC CPH blade as my forehand rubber.

I found it much more preferable to my previous rubbers: Xiom OME 7 Europe, Victas 15 stiff, and Cornilleau Target Pro 43. The Rozena offers several advantages: It is user-friendly and comfortable to handle for a wide range of shots, including serves, blocks, short play, loops, and hitting compared to the other rubbers. While it may not be on par with the performance of Tenergy rubbers, it offers comparable value at half the price, providing around 85% of Tenergy’s capabilities.

As players advance in their skills, transitioning to Tenergy rubbers becomes a natural progression. However, for mid to advanced level players (which constitutes a majority of players), the Rozena is an excellent choice.

After an extended period without playing, I noticed a reduction in speed. However, this issue was resolved by re-gluing the rubber.

Oooh, this is an interesting rubber. I tried this on Stiga Infinity VPS V. It is quite similar to T05. It feels very bouncy, which makes smashes and pushes amazing. Offensive blocking on the backhand is fantastic! At the same time, you have decent control.

The dwell time is low, so looping from down low and against backspin is hard. The rubber is fast, even away from the table. Spin is okay, but with the right execution, it can be good. I feel like it’s best for playing close to the table with direct shots and counterplay. Serves and the short game are average.

So overall, this is good rubber with a nice feel. It is one of the best before you go to the next level (T05, etc.).

A rubber designed for beginners. It’s easy to play with, but that’s about all it offers.

I love this rubber. It is not too fast, not too spinny, but the control is perfect. a very safe rubber with a reasonable price.

This rubber is recommended for beginners and learners. Coaches may find it useful for teaching and practicing with.

Compared to other recent rubbers, it has average spin and not much control. This rubber seems to have the leftover bad parts of the Tenergy series that didn’t make the Grade A cut and has 30% less spin and 20% less speed.

For the price, there are better options available. If you are considering Butterfly rubbers, consider the Tenergy series instead.

The Butterfly Rozena is a forgiving, spinny, and fast rubber suitable for intermediate players. Developing players who struggle with reading spin and adjusting racket angles may benefit from using the Rozena. Due to my backhand-only use, I cannot comment on forehand techniques.

Countering/Blocking:
Countering is effortless, allowing for quick returns that avoid the net. Blocking requires some adjustment as the rubber has low spin sensitivity. Diagonal blocks may occasionally slip on the racket, but this can be mitigated.

Topspins:
Flicks and slow loops played with minimum contact do not fully utilize the sponge. However, mid-distance and table-top drive loops generate significant spin despite the low sensitivity. Against backspin, engaging the sponge ensures net clearance.

Short Game/Pushes:
The Rozena’s short game is not its strength. It provides a safe defense, mitigating errors caused by inaccurate bat angles. However, spin production is subpar compared to other rubbers. Properly engaging the sponge is necessary for effective short-range spin, while long pushes can be executed with proper technique.

TL;DR:
The Rozena is an ideal rubber for developing players. Its low incoming spin sensitivity allows for spin generation when engaging the sponge.

Good, fast attacking rubber. It’s extremely tolerable to miss hits, and most of them still land on the table. I am currently using it on my backhand, and it makes keeping pressure very easy.

Review:

This rubber offers an unparalleled experience that defies comparison to Tenergy. Its unique blend of softness and hardness provides exceptional control, feel, and spin. It pairs particularly well with light, soft blades and control blades, where it truly shines.

I’ve used this rubber on both my backhand and forehand, finding it equally impressive in both positions. Butterfly’s assertion that Rozena’s primary strength lies in its forgiveness is spot on.

I have only been playing for 2 years, so my review is from a beginner’s perspective. I use these rubbers for both my forehand and backhand (2.1). I decided to purchase these rubbers after an experienced player recommended them to me.

The rubbers offer a high level of control, allowing you to generate a lot of spin. However, I found the rubber to be too fast for my playing style, and I have since switched to less “reactive” rubbers.

This is like a toned-down version of Tenergry.

It offers the same spring sponge, but with improved control and a higher margin of error.

This makes it suitable for beginner to intermediate players.

I bought Rozena 1.7mm accidentally, just to try it, from my friend and paired it with TSP Balsa 6.5.
I can only say good things about this rubber.
Now I play with Tibhar Stratus in 2.1mm and not planning to change the combo.
Comparing it to the Tenergy series, it is more like T05 but with a harder top sheet and softer sponge.
It has lower spin and lower arc in openings, similar to T64, the trajectory is shorter but the speed is similar to T05.
The control is much higher than with T05.

I used the 1.7mm rubber only to try it on a TSP Balsa 6.5 blade.
I really liked it.
Now I have paired it with Tibhar Stratus in 2.1mm and the combination is even better.
It is most similar to T05, but it has a harder surface and a softer sponge.
In comparison to T05, the spin is weaker, the arc is lower (like T64), and it is slightly slower, but it has much more control, which is evident in countershots. It almost plays itself.
It lasts quite a long time, I play twice a week for over 5 months and it still plays отлично.
I hope I helped you a bit with your choice…

I play with 2.1 mm sponge on Viscaria FL on both sides (forehand and backhand) for about 5 months. Rozena is a cheaper, slower, and better variant of T64. It is truly an amazing rubber.

Everything from serving to flicking serves, topspinning pushes, and blocking is well-executed with this rubber. It plays according to the player’s skill and abilities. I am very satisfied and impressed with the control and speed of the Rozena rubber. It is very forgiving, and you will be amazed by its performance.

I like this rubber because it is considerably lighter (43 g). I think the speed is about 10% less than T64, the spin is about 10% less than T05, and the control is about 10% more than T80 because it has low sensitivity to incoming rotation.

Rozena gives you a comfortable and easy game and is just as durable as TENERGY. It is an excellent choice for players aspiring to a professional level.

I just got my new Butterfly Yoshida Kaii Cpen blade from Japan 3 days ago. I went to my local table tennis club in the Greater Toronto Area today to try it out.

I glued a new Rozena black rubber with a 2.1 mm sponge for the forehand side. I used a Bty red ph sheet on the backhand side because the blade is heavy and I’m used to playing with a Jpen blade (Senkoh 1 with Tenergy 80 rubber) that weighs less than the new Kaii blade.

I’m satisfied and impressed with the control and speed of the Rozena rubber. It took me only 30 minutes to adjust to my new blade/rubber combination. I highly recommend this rubber, especially for developing players. It’s forgiving and you’ll be amazed at its performance. Cheers!

This is a downgraded version of Tenergy 05. The sponge is powerful, even if you exert little power on your own. However, it is not very suitable for a very fast blade. The power and very high throw angle will make it hard to control if you are using a super fast carbon blade.

Rozena is a good rubber that has similar properties to Tenergy 05, but with less spin. It is also significantly cheaper than Tenergy 05.

I believe Rozena is a better rubber because the high arc it produces allows the ball to go over the net safely.

Speed: High, not as fast as Tenergy 64 but very fast.

Spin: Moderate, far from Tenergy 05 but on par with other modern rubbers.

Control: Very high. Not very spin-sensitive, a medium-hard sponge, and a medium throw make it very easy to play with.

This rubber is great for backhand or developing forehand. It performs well in all areas and, at the current price, is a very good deal.

What a brilliant marketing move for Butterfly to introduce this new rubber. With Tenergy prices leaving the galaxy, this is a pleasant surprise considering Rozena’s performance for a wide range of players. It reminded me of T05fx with a bit less spin and a tic more control. Also like Xiom Vega Europe but with more speed.

This rubber doesn’t need to be forced into making any shot in the game as it plays smooth with no quirky gears like regular T05. Also plays like T64fx with slightly less speed. Mid-level players will really like what this rubber offers at a decent price point.

Not as spin-sensitive as many tensor rubbers. I am playing Rozena on a BTY P. Korbel in 2.1. Really nice combo for looping and aggressive all-round style. Noted the lack of any tackiness to the topsheet; however, it is grippy to produce high spin.

I have a feeling this will be a winner for Butterfly worldwide and should be around for many years to come. Medium-high throw, good feel, plenty of speed, and spin. Gives confidence with service returns. A really good horsey you will enjoy riding.

Rozena is a rubber that definitely gives you what it promises.
Opposite to Tenergy rubbers, Rozena makes average players stronger while making stronger players weaker.
What I mean is when you play against a player technically less advanced than you, you may wish for a little more speed or spin.
However, when playing against better players, you probably pray for BTY engineers for creating such a good rubber each time your ball finds its way to the opponent’s side.
I believe Rozena is a good choice for intermediates to have fun with the game and to elevate a higher level.

I’m glad Butterfly didn’t name this one as Tenergy XX so we can get it at an acceptable price. After playing Tenergy 05 for a year and a half, I switched to this rubber and couldn’t be more satisfied.

I get the same speed, great spin, and better control. The tolerance is no joke. I get more hits on the table than before, where every little mistake meant a not-so-spinny topspin or a miss. Super rubber, top choice.

Although this rubber is often described as a “jack of all trades” and therefore boring, the Rozena is truly an amazing rubber. Where it shines is dependability. Surely this is not something that sounds as sexy as high speed, high spin, high everything, but it’s a remarkable feat nonetheless.

Everything from serving, to flicking serves, topspinning, pushes, and blocking it does well. I think this all-aroundness can be attributed to the slightly harder topsheet and the still firm sponge. Both make the rubber less sensitive to incoming spin while also providing it with enough speed and dwell.

The one thing I noticed, however, was that it is at times easy to overshoot the table on the 5th and 7th ball, but I believe this is due to my inexperience with the spring sponge and past play with short pips.

Nothing spectacular, but it will do the job. This is a cheaper and slower variant of T64. Good BH rubber for ALL+/OFF- style.

My friend recently acquired this 1.7mm Red rubber as a more moderate choice while developing his technique and touch. While I favor it as a backhand option, it can also be considered for forehand play (though I prefer TEn 05 for forehand or Chinese rubbers).

Upon first contact with the ball, I was impressed by its consistency and superior sense of feel. It doesn’t particularly excel in any specific playing aspect but stands out in its dependability. I would highly recommend this rubber for shakehand players seeking a reliable backhand option (I’m uncertain about its suitability for penhold reverse penhold backhand).

To summarize: This is a quality rubber that excels as a backhand option for shakehand players (especially during the development of their technique). If you’re seeking a dependable backhand rubber to accompany your skill growth, I highly recommend this product.

Very great rubber with a lot of spin and speed. The control and durability are also excellent.

Rozenna is Butterfly’s answer to the numerous “tenergy alternative” rubbers that have emerged over the past 3-4 years. I purchased it directly from a Butterfly vendor, who described it as being just as fast as Tenergy 05 with reduced spin.

That is precisely what I have discovered after playing with the rubber for over 20 hours. It is indeed as fast as T05, but with approximately half the spin. The lower spin generates a less pronounced medium/high throw angle characteristic of T05, which required the most adjustment. I had to modify my stroke to produce similar spin to my accustomed shots.

If your game emphasizes counter hitting and flat hitting, this rubber is highly recommended. However, if your game relies heavily on spin, it is advisable to refrain from using this rubber.

Tried this rubber as both a Backhand (B/H) and Forehand (F/H) on my Pingmaster s/l carbon which had Omega V euro on both sides.

I Changed the red Omega to the Rozena and played for about 2.5 hrs, twiddling the bat occasionally. Although the Rozena is a good rubber that many people would like and would complement many playing styles, it could not match the Omega V euro (OVE) in either speed or spin with the control being almost equal.

The Xiom had a bit more grip, was slightly less bouncy for pushes and service returns, and had a slight edge when it came to offensive play, the Rozena being superior when I was forced to play passively or defend a loopdrive/ smash onslaught.

So all in all, the Rozena is a very solid rubber which can be used for both F/H and B/H, and may help you reduce some of those niggly WTF moments you have with some of the more top-end tensors.

Personally, I have tended to opt for the slower, more controlled blade option in coping with those uncooperative sheets as I am addicted to spin. Although cheaper than Tenergy, Rozena is still very expensive, especially when you can find a lot of higher-spec current or slightly older tensors for $25-35 US dollars . The cheapest I’ve seen this is $44.95.

Very good rubber. I found it very similar to the Tenergy 80. However, I found it lacks speed. This is the only thing that could be improved. The speed and control are okay. It’s a good rubber for fast players that don’t put a lot of effects because this is the only weak point in this rubber.

A lot of people just look at this as Tenergy-lite, but if you evaluate it on its own merits, it’s a really excellent rubber for those looking for a balanced attack with good control and consistency, while still being dynamic with good spin and speed.

It has the same spring sponge as the Tenergy series, my best comparison being a slightly softer and more forgiving Tenergy 80. Its throw angle is similar to MX-P or just less than T80 on the Tenergy scale. It also has relatively good spin and speed, being just a notch below the most aggressive attacking rubbers.

The other criticism I’ve heard of this rubber is that it’s a jack of all trades, but a master of none. While it doesn’t quite match the spin and looping ability of Tenergy 05 or speed of Tibhar MX-P, if your game is more than just pure looping and utilizes blocking, control, and placement (and you like Butterfly’s spring sponge), then this is an excellent rubber you should give serious consideration.

There’s nothing you can’t do with this rubber. It offers the dynamic attacking feel of Tenergy while being less spin-sensitive and easier to use in the short game.

I replaced my Friendship 729-5 backhand rubber with this one. It provided me with increased control, speed, and spin.

Review Text:
Bad Rubber Yamada.

Butterfly Rozena Rubber Review

A fantastic new rubber from Butterfly, the Rozena offers several advantages:

• Affordability: Priced lower than comparable rubbers.
• Ease of Play: Suitable for players of various skill levels.
• Forgiveness: Allows for a margin of error when hitting the ball.
• High Elasticity: Provides excellent energy return and spin potential.

Overall, the Rozena proved to be an excellent replacement for the T05FX. Having played with T05FX 1.9mm on a ZLC blade for over 5 years, I found the Rozena to provide a similar feel with improved responsiveness and touch. Its affordability makes it a compelling choice for players seeking high-performance rubber at a reasonable price.

Review of Rozena Table Tennis Rubber

Rozena rubber provides a feel that’s less extreme than Tenergy rubbers. It offers slightly less spin sensitivity, speed, and catapult effect. However, it still performs exceptionally well for amateur players, and some professionals have even switched to Rozena.

Despite its lower price point (approximately $25 cheaper than Tenergy), it’s estimated that 95% of players in a blind play test wouldn’t be able to distinguish between the two rubbers. Rozena’s easier control may even result in improved scores.

Butterfly designed Rozena to compete with other rubbers in its price range, such as Tibhar MX-P and Donic Bluefire. The company likely aimed to appeal to players with lower budgets. At $50 per sheet, Rozena is suitable for players below a rating of 2500 (essentially all amateur players).

While individual preferences for different rubbers vary, Rozena objectively ranks among the best. Its exceptional performance and affordable price make it a perennial best seller.

It’s more controllable than T05 or T64. It has strong spin and medium speed. I put this ROZENA on my Butterfly Primorac Carbon’s forehand. It’s a very good rubber for those who are not professional players.

La gomma somiglia nella parte esterna alla tenergy ma è più lenta. Ha la piuma diversa: non è morbida ma è più lenta.
Il top è facile e ha molto giro ma ovviamente è peggiore nei block e nella schiacciata…
Come la tenergy, se tiri forte diventa veloce e ha molto effetto con colla fresca. Nel complesso la trovo una buona gomma ma mi aspettavo qualcosa di più, io la uso sul rovescio perché per me sul dritto non va bene: non chiude dritto schiacciando e non riesco a chiudere il punto se non con il top… Sono i primi test, forse abituandomi migliora,
Inoltre mi aspettavo costasse anche un po’ meno, in italia per ora il prezzo è 43- 45 euro e allora forse è meglio una Andro rasant Grip che si trova a 32-33 euro e non delude …

La gomma ha il top simile alla tenergy ma la gommapiuma è molto più lenta. Il risultato è che ha un ottimo spin e un top spin molto facile… ma a me non piace per il block e la schiacciata
…tenergy vs Rozena è come Viscaria vs Viscaria Light …(un’altra gomma, un’altra serie…) ah ah ah!
Calvario.

My first impressions after three training sessions:

So far, I played a Vega Pro on the backhand. Overall, it is a very good rubber, but it feels too slow for me away from the table. This is the reason why I tried the Rozena. I play it in red 1.9mm.

The conversion was no problem. I play it exclusively on the backhand, so my rating is based on that.

Serves: I have not tested enough so far to make a usable statement.

Short game: It is easy to play with this rubber.

Backhand loops: Are great.

Blocking: Is very comfortable, both active and passive. In my opinion, one of the best, perhaps the best, I have tried so far for blocking.

Chop: Excellent chop game, very well dosed/controllable.

Flick: Were easy to play and dangerous.

Hard backhand strokes: Are easy to play also away from the table. The hardness is between T05 and T05 FX, I think.

The quality is as usual from Butterfly, without complaint. The price is acceptable, but 39.90 € would be enough ;-) No money wasted, did what I wanted, and will stay on my blade. For my game, it is a great backhand rubber. Play and have fun!

Butterfly Rozena

Facts:

• Black rubber with 1.9mm sponge
• Weight: 92 g (with packaging), 65 g (uncutted), 44 g on OFF+ALC blade
• Sponge hardness: 35 Japanese degrees (equivalent to 45 international degrees)
• Soft, grippy top rubber

Characteristics:

• Easier to control than Tenergy 05 or 05 FX
• Spin development and controllability vary significantly depending on the blade used
• Susceptibility to incoming spin, especially on ZLC blades

Best Results:

• Achieved with medium-fast solid wood blades
• Excellent control and high spin

Worst Results:

• Experienced with hard, fast ZLC blades
• High susceptibility to spin

Conclusion:

The Butterfly Rozena can be an exceptional rubber when paired with the right blade. However, its performance is highly dependent on the specific wood used.

I used the Rozena on the same blade that I used both the Nitakku Fastarc G1 and the DHS Hurricane 3 Neo. Even if they all were the same price (Rozena is more expensive than both, DHS super cheap at $25), I would still place the Rozena at the bottom.

The 2 other rubbers simply are better in all ways: better control, speed, spin, and overall feel. Even if you are a beginner, I still wouldn’t use it as the control is still better on the other rubbers. It’s as simple as that. There are better rubbers for all level players out there for this price.

For those interested, I prefer the Nitakku over the DHS.

Review:

Details: Used on both sides with a Clipper WRB FL.

Recommendation: Suitable for beginners and intermediate players.

Spin: Excellent spin generation, but rubber is fragile and susceptible to damage.

Speed: Slow rubber, not recommended for advanced players.

Suitability: May not be suitable for powerful shots with the current configuration. Some semi-pros use it for backhand, but it’s only recommended for forehand by beginners (e.g., those with 11 months of training).

Future Plans: The reviewer intends to switch to a Fan Zhendong Alc, which may improve the suitability of the rubber for their current playing style.

As a fairly skilled armature player, I have used Xiom Omega 3 and 4 Euro for several years. I appreciated its soft, grippy top sheet, which allowed me to generate spin with ease.

In contrast, Rozena’s top sheet is firmer, necessitating more pressure to penetrate the surface. Being a tensor top sheet, the ball recoils swiftly, resulting in a shorter dwell time than I prefer. Control is also inferior to Xiom rubber.

Despite my initial efforts to acclimate to it, I eventually switched back to Omega VII Euro after a few months.