Butterfly Tenergy 64

Tensor 74 reviews

74 Reviews

#1 — May 2023

I bought this rubber to replace the Dignics 05 I’ve been using on my backhand. It’s made a significant difference in my game. I have tried many backhand rubbers, but this one is my favorite.

Initially, I tried it in 1.9 mm on a Stiga Cybershape Wood, but now I’m using it in 2.1 mm on a Butterfly Innerforce ULC. I find this rubber particularly effective for blocking and punching. It’s less sensitive to spin, allowing me to control incoming spin easily and counter-punch spinny balls effortlessly. I’ve also noticed consistent chop blocks with this rubber.

I tested it on my forehand side, but it was too fast for me, resulting in a low trajectory. I prefer a slower rubber on my forehand since I play with a hard and fast stroke. I couldn’t adjust to the high speed of this rubber on my forehand. However, it’s an excellent choice for backhand play. Its speed allows for effortless topspin strokes. If you’re concerned about the speed, try it in 1.9 mm. While the difference in speed is subtle, it provides slightly better control.

#2 — April 2023

My teammate uses long pips on the backhand and this on the forehand. The speed is faster than Tenergy 05, and the throw is lower. In thinner sponges, this rubber becomes excellent for chopping balls low over the net.

#3 — February 2023

T64 is a very fast rubber, but it is relatively too soft for me. If you struggle to generate force in your backhand, you could consider using it. However, for advanced users, D64 would be a better option as it is firmer.

#4 — September 2022

Coming from a Tenergy 80, the speed and throw angle appalled me. I expected this rubber to only be fast in the short game, but I was surprised at how fast and direct it was from a distance too! I’ve been using it on my backhand (2.1 mm) on a Harimoto Innerforce ZLC.

Compared to other Tenergy rubbers, the T64 is the ugly duckling in terms of spin. The aim of this rubber is fast, direct shots to catch your opponents off guard and win points, not spin. Deep table backhand fake no-spin serves are great with this rubber - my opponent can’t react!

If you are weak and need a tensor rubber for producing fast direct shots from longer distances on your forehand, this is for you. For forehand, it excels in third ball attacks, fast pendulum serves, fast down-the-line serves, and fast hook serves.

Hope you guys get to know this rubber more from this review and keep on ponging!

Update: Horrible durability. The top sheet got obliterated within 3 months. Apparently, it’s not worth the price for the durability, but for the quality, 10/10.

#5 — April 2022

The top sheet can be toasted very quickly, which improves blocking. However, the rubber is significantly overpriced; numerous better options at half the cost are available.

#6 — June 2019

This rubber is excellent. I tested it on a Yasaka Max Wood blade. The rubber has a lot of speed and is really good. It is quite sensitive to spins, however, and does not produce a good spin serve. Overall, I really love this rubber because it provides immense speed and spin, and gives a comfortable feel.

#7 — February 2019

A good control rubber with a medium-soft feel. It is fast with a lower throw but not particularly spinny. The focus of this rubber is on direct, fast stroke attacks for forehand and flick backhand shots. It comes with a high price tag and is not very durable. However, there is no other rubber quite like it.

#8 — January 2019

…â�°â±â°Ñ‚Ñ‚â¾â²Ñ âºâ¾â¼ â¶â°â½ â¶â¸âºâµ, â½âµ â¿â¾â¼â½ÑŽ âºâ°âºâ¾â¼ Ñ‚â¾Ñ‡â½â¾, Ñ â»âµâ²â° â¾Ñ‡âµâ½ÑŒ â¿â¾â½Ñ€â°â²â¸â»â°Ñ ÑŒ, â² â°âºÑ‚â¸â²â½â¾â¹ â¸â³Ñ€âµ - â¿Ñ€â¾Ñ Ñ‚â¾ â¿âµÑ â½Ñ .
â¢â¾â¿Ñ Ñ‹ â²Ñ‹Ñ Ñ‚Ñ€âµâ»â¸â²â°âµÑ‚ Ñ‚â¾Ñ‡â½â¾ â² Ñ Ñ‚â¾â» â·â° Ѡчёт â¼Ñ â³âºâ¾â³â¾ âºâ¾â½Ñ‚Ñ€â¾â»ÑŒâ½â¾â³â¾ Ñ‚â¾â¿Ñˆâ¸Ñ‚Ⱐ⸠âºâ°Ñ‚â°â¿Ñƒâ»ÑŒÑ‚â¾â¹ â³Ñƒâ±âºâ¸. â’ Ñ â²Ñ â·â¸ Ñ Ñ Ñ‚â¸â¼ Ñ…â¾Ñ€â¾Ñˆâµâµ â²Ñ€â°Ñ‰âµâ½â¸âµ â»â¸ÑˆÑŒ â½â° â¼â¾Ñ‰â½Ñ‹Ñ… уâ´â°Ñ€â°Ñ… â¿Ñ€â¸ â¿Ñ€â¾â¶â¸â¼âµ ⸠â¿â¾â³Ñ€Ñƒâ¶âµâ½â¸â¸ â¼Ñ Ñ‡â° â² â½â°âºâ»â°â´âºÑƒ…

#9 — July 2018

Headline: Table Tennis Rubber Review

As an amateur player without formal training, my technique is riddled with flaws and unorthodox habits. After using Tenergy 80 for four years, switching to this new rubber resulted in a striking difference. While my previous rubber was certainly old and worn, the ease with which this new one returns serves at an impressive speed still amazes me.

I left it on the backhand, which is my more proficient stroke. When using it for forehand drives, the balls consistently flew high and long. It’s also slightly challenging to use for chopping, but for backhand blocks and attacks, it has left me deeply impressed. I can confidently assert that it almost plays on its own!

#10 — January 2018

T64 is suitable for users who prefer soft rubber with speed and easy control. It is softer than T05 and T05FX. T64 is less tacky than T05, feels soft and slow on slow strokes, but faster than T05 on high gear (hard strokes).

T64 can be grouped with other soft rubber sponges like Xiom Vega Euro, Acuda S3, Rasanter R37, and Rakza7 Soft. While it differs from these rubbers, it excels as a rubber for control.

#11 — May 2017

Coming from a T05 on FH, I can say that T64 is slightly faster, has a bit more control, but also produces a little less spin. Regarding hardness, the two rubbers felt similar to me. Overall, T64 is an excellent rubber. I tried it on both my backhand and forehand, and it performed well on both sides.

#12 — December 2016

This rubber is meant for at least intermediate players. I use Tenergy 64 on my forehand and Tenergy 05 on my backhand. If you want more spin, go with the Tenergy 05. But if you want more speed, the Tenergy 64 is definitely better.

Also, in the very beginning, the rubber has an uncomfortable and uncontrollable feel to it. But as you play with it more, the rubber’s potential will show, and your play will become much better and faster.

#13 — August 2016

Very good backhand rubber. I think it shines in fast drive/counters from close or mid distance. Also, very good blocking. It has a low, linear trajectory.

It is also very spinny, but the throw angle is lower than other tensors I think. Spin and loop are also very good - you can really feel the ball dig in the sponge. It’s pretty fast - I think you can play very comfortably in mid distance.

Edit: I got a 2.1mm sponge.

#14 — June 2016

T64 rubber, the softest in the Tenergy series, provides easy ball control with a low throw angle. Despite its softness, it maintains a high spin rate that rivals other series. This rubber pairs well with elastic blades, enhancing touch sensitivity. However, on stiffer blades, its softness may result in a looser touch feel.

#15 — May 2016

Reference rubber. Feels softer, slower, and provides more control than 05 due to a larger distance between pips. It uses the same rubber and sponge as 05. Like all Tenergies, the rubber lasts quite long but tears apart at the edges easily.

#16 — May 2016

Use it on any wood blade (from all to off-), and you’ll love it, like Butterfly Petr Korbel, Oh Sang-Eun, or Hadraw VK.

#17 — May 2016

Comparison of T05 and T64 Table Tennis Rubbers

Recently, I switched from H3 Neo to non-tacky FH rubber and tested both T05 and T64, both in 2.1 thickness, for my FH.

Speed
T64 is slightly faster than T05 and has a noticeable speed-glue effect.

Spin
T05 and T64 are very close in spin potential. They have the same grippy topsheet and sponge, but the size and spacing of the pips differ. While T05 has higher spin potential on paper, in practice, they are nearly identical.

Control
T64 has slightly better control than T05. T05 is more sensitive to incoming spin, making serve receives more challenging.

Throw
T05 has a higher throw than T64. Due to T64’s stronger catapult, its throw appears lower and feels bouncier. While chopping is easier with T64 due to its throw, I don’t utilize FH chopping often.

Feeling
T64 feels softer and more forgiving than T05. T05 feels like a boosted H3 Neo that has lost its tack.

Looping
Both T05 and T64 handle looping well. T64 is less sensitive to spin, which is advantageous. They both lift backspin effectively and perform well when looping close to the table. However, T64 offers more power and spin away from the table.

Blocking
T05 and T64 are equal in blocking capabilities, although some argue that T64 has an edge.

Serves
T05 excels in serves due to T64’s bounciness. However, I can generate spinny serves with T64 as well.

Overall
Overall, T64 is my preferred FH rubber, but both T05 and T64 are excellent options.

#18 — May 2016

BEST BH RUBBER EVER! I’ve been looking for a rubber that is not reacted to spin and has a huge amount of speed so that it is easier to flick every service. I’ve tried so many rubbers before I decided to go to the Tenergy series. I’m telling you, the Tenergy 64 is the best BH rubber that I’ve used. It has lots of control and lightning speed when you get the proper stroke of using it.

At first, I thought it was slower than Tenergy 05, but when I tried to hit the ball deep in the sponge, oh man, I’m telling you, it was VERY FAST! Take your time to get used to it, then you will tell me that you’re not changing your BH rubber anymore!

#19 — March 2016

This rubber excels at blocking, smashing, and countering. Additionally, it is less sensitive against incoming spin compared to T05. While it may not be as easy to spin with as T05, it still generates more spin than other tensor rubbers.

#20 — March 2016

Good backhand rubber.

#21 — February 2016

If you are looking to dominate with full forehand attacks, the Tenergry 04 is the top choice. From blistering fast topspins to controlled, spinny ones, this rubber provides versatility. Its slow topsheet gives excellent control, allowing for precise placement of your shots.

When it comes to serves, chopping is a breeze with this rubber. Most opponents find it challenging to lift the ball over the net, giving you a significant advantage. And if they do manage to get it back, your forehand topspin is ready to end the point swiftly.

Additionally, executing drop serves close to the net becomes effortless. Pair this rubber with the outstanding Xiom Hayabusa ZXi blade for an exceptional playing experience.

#22 — November 2015

I have used Tenergy 64 in backhand on almost five paddles: Primorac Carbon, Xiom Hayabusa ZX1, Butterfly ZJK, DHS PG9, and Stiga Diamond Touch VPS. In my opinion, it works best on backhands. I do not prefer the FX version, so I prefer the Tenergy 64. It is easy to make a deadly flick with this rubber.

#23 — November 2015

Pretty solid rubber, ideal for players with a strong, spinny BH like me!

Even though the price is a bit ouchy, it won’t let you down.

#24 — November 2015
  • Very fast, wonderful for BH.
  • Not much spin, though.
#25 — September 2015

This rubber on the backhand is not comparable to the best rubber for backhand excellent.

#26 — May 2015

The rubber is soft and fast, but it is difficult to control. When compared to the 05, it is not a classic.

#27 — April 2015

Tenergy 64 can be a formidable weapon with impressive control, provided you have a little patience initially. It is consistent and considered an upgrade from the 05, offering increased speed. However, it can be frustrating for beginners. Give it a week of use, and you’ll likely cherish it.

#28 — November 2014

You can rely on this on your backhand side. Superb for blocking!

#29 — August 2014

Great backhand rubber.

#30 — June 2014

This is a superb backhand (BH) rubber.

#31 — May 2014

Good rubber, but not as fast as Butterfly claims. It is best suited for backhand play due to its excellent control and spin capabilities.

#32 — March 2014

This rubber is quite fast and provides good control for blocking. It also generates a significant amount of spin. Overall, it’s a great choice for table tennis players.

#33 — February 2014

Extremely fast, the minimal spin and softness of the sponge makes it extremely easy to control topspin loops. Close to the table and away from the table attacks are also fairly easy.

For a forehand, this rubber is somewhat sensitive to spin and has a spring sponge, making it hard to have a strong short game. Additionally, this rubber is not strong for chopping. This rubber is ideal for those looking for an offensive playstyle focused on ATTACK! If you’re looking for a short game without losing anything, consider T80.

T64 excels at blocking and counterattacking, making it a fantastic forehand and backhand rubber for those whose playing style aligns with its strengths.

#34 — October 2013

Ya llevo varias semanas entrenando con esta goma por ambos lados en MAX. Vengo de unas Andro Rasant en 1.9 y puedo decir que los topspins son más rápidos y con más efecto. Los servicios llevan una buena cantidad de spin.

Para los loops, me pareció mejor la Rasant, ya que su tacky influye en darle más efecto a la pelota. Los bloqueos con la T64 son simplemente asombrosos. A mediana distancia puedes dirigirlos a donde quieras. En corta distancia hay que regular un poco el ángulo porque si vienen duro o con mucho efecto se irán largas.

Para golpes planos también es muy buena, siempre cuidando el ángulo de la raqueta dada la velocidad de las gomas. Para cortes es efectiva siempre y cuando tengas la técnica porque sino levantas mucho la bola. Eso sí, van con bastante efecto al igual que toda la serie de las Tenergy.

Para los contraataques es una monstruosidad tanto en corta-media como en larga distancia. Lo único que no me gusta mucho es el ángulo que es medio a bajo, lo que en situaciones de mucha presión en donde necesitas precisión de no poseer la velocidad necesaria puede que se te vaya a la malla.

En fin, una excelente goma para jugadores ofensivos que buscan mejorar su juego. Es excelente en casi todos sus aspectos. Lo malo es su precio y que la superficie es algo delicada. La estoy usando con una madera Zhang Jike.

#35 — August 2013

When I first received the Tenergy 64, I was unimpressed. It replaced my previous Acuda S1, and the T64 seemed much slower. However, as the weeks went by, I gradually warmed up to this rubber and am now quite satisfied with it.

In my opinion, the T64 is much spinnier than the Acuda S1 and has a higher throw angle, making it easier for opening up. However, the Acuda S1 wins in speed, and control is about the same.

The T64 is a quite good, spinny rubber with fairly good durability. It hasn’t lost its shine even after 50+ hours of training. Overall, it is a good rubber that works well on both FH and BH.

With okay speed, good spin, and good control, there is nothing wrong with this rubber.

#36 — August 2013

I received this rubber two days ago and have been using it on the backhand side of my BTY TBZLF blade. So far, it provides excellent flicks near the table and at mid-distance. When used with proper technique, it also allows for very good attacking shots, offering a nice balance of control and speed.

#37 — February 2013

Currently using T64 on my backhand, I didn’t find it quite as effective on my forehand. It’s not fast enough and doesn’t generate as much spin as I would like.

T64 is similar in many ways to Hexer+, but it has a higher throw angle (which is good for opening loops) and better durability.

#38 — January 2013

very nice

#39 — December 2012

I am 14 years old with a very weird style. I am a shakehand player who uses forehand pimples with TENERGY 64 on the backhand. I find it quite easy to control on the backhand, but on the forehand it is quite difficult to control the ball. If you are to hit the ball in a weird way, then the ball will go off the table. However, this can be avoided most of the time by putting more topspin on the ball to make it dip down. If you do that, then it is a fantastic rubber.

#40 — November 2012

Caoutchouc très rapide

Ce caoutchouc nécessite une maîtrise technique élevée et une utilisation importante des jambes. Il est excellent pour les personnes qui jouent loin de la table, mais moins efficace pour le jeu près de la table ou le jeu court.

Spin et vitesse

Il offre un spin acceptable mais une vitesse explosive.

#41 — September 2012

I tried this rubber 2 years ago on Timoboll ALC. Timoboll ALC has a catapult effect blade, and pairing it with T64 made it too springy. I’ve just used this rubber for the last 1.5 months. I got the new batch, and it’s harder than my old one, more solid, and has a better feel. Now I use it on Viscaria as backhand rubber.

This rubber really blocks well, and it’s not too sensitive against incoming spin compared to T05. It’s not as easy to spin as T05, but it’s still very spinny compared to Tensor rubbers. Before, I rated this rubber as crap and not worth it. Now I really enjoy using this rubber; it’s unreplaceable now :)

#42 — September 2012

It says in the catalogue for mid to long range play. This is true, but it is also suitable for near the table play. I use it on my Zhang Jike blade, and it works well with my backhand. I recently switched it to my forehand as well. It is perfect for looping and push blocking. I have had mine for 5 months now, and it is still in its original form, as when I bought it. It is perfect for counter-hitting and serving because of its spin. I recently bought another one, this time with a thinner 1.7mm sponge thickness.

#43 — April 2012

Using Tenergy 64 in 1.7mm on Grubba ALL+ flexible wooden blade.

Much better for match play than 2.1mm and still plenty fast enough.

In 1.7mm Tenergy 64 can do everything from chop to loop to wristy TSP to counterhit. Most players are choosing 2.1mm and 1.9mm thinking that the 1.7mm will be too slow, but on the Grubba All+ this is not the case!

In fact, for the first few sessions, it is ultra fast and then settles down to be fast but controllable.

My best combo ever for FH and can twiddle to use on my BH to give different effects to my T05 1.7mm BH rubber.

#44 — February 2012

Using 2.1mm thickness on both sides of an Andro Carbo-Aramid blade, it’s a good rubber, but definitely not worth 80 dollars.

Palio Blit’z does everything T64 does but with better control and costs half as much.

I don’t see why people rave so much about this rubber.

#45 — January 2012

A very good rubber, but too expensive.

#46 — December 2011

Tenergy 64: The perfect backhand rubber. However, I prefer it on the forehand. If you engage with the sponge more, it’s better for looping than the T05, and much better for speed.

Designed for mid-distance play, and for those who prefer softer rubbers, I recommend T64 on the forehand and Bryce Speed FX for the backhand.

#47 — November 2011

I have been using this rubber for two months on my TBS blade, replacing a Chinese rubber. So far, I am very satisfied with its performance.

#48 — October 2011

Good backhand rubber. It’s bouncy, making it suitable for those who previously used speedglued Bryce on the backhand. It excels at blocking.

For opening loops on the backhand, I prefer T05.

Ultimately, the choice between T64 and T05 for the backhand depends on the blade’s speed. For slower blades, T64 is recommended due to its greater bounciness compared to T05. Conversely, on faster blades, T05 would be more appropriate.

#49 — September 2011

Honestly, the best backhand rubber I’ve ever played with. The ball trajectory is fairly low, thus it is great for blocking, smashing, and countering.

However, the spin is superb, particularly for backhand looping both of the bounce and away from the table.

Surprisingly, pushing is better with the 64 than the 05, and it generates very good spin.

This is an excellent rubber on composite blades with a medium feel, like Michael Maze.

#50 — September 2011

Amazing! If you love FH looping, then this is the rubber for you!

#51 — September 2011

Immense rubber. Got 64 on the backhand and my loops are becoming incredibly fast and spinny. The setup is a ZLF Blade with 64 b/h and 05 f/h, perfect for me. I’m finding it very easy to use close and far away from the table.

Just bring the price down! Just bought two butterfly rubbers and it took 100 from me!

#52 — August 2011

Great forehand or backhand rubber. I have it on the forehand of a Timo Boll Spirit blade with T05 on the other side, and it plays consistently. I’m a two-winged power looper and love the pace and spin I can get with this rubber. Blocks and smashes are great with it. The only drawback is the price. Butterfly rubber is becoming too absurdly priced.

#53 — July 2011

This rubber is good for backhand (BH). However, the throw angle indicated here is medium-high, which is inaccurate. The throw angle is actually low. Due to this low throw angle, it is challenging to use this rubber on forehand (FH) without making numerous mistakes, unless you are a top-level professional.

#54 — April 2011

This is perfect rubber. I really like it!

#55 — April 2011

Until a few months ago, I used Tenergy 05. I changed because of its poor control.

Then, I worked hard on my technique and tried Tenergy 64. It is a little bit softer and easier to control.

The price is expensive, but it’s fun and very easy to play with.

#56 — January 2011

I am using Innerforce ALC, and I must say it is the best rubber I am using for my backhand.

#57 — November 2010

Super fast! Faster and spinnier than Tenergy 05 and 25.

#58 — September 2010

I’m rated about 1600 and I am mostly an offensive player. This rubber was completely different from other rubbers I have tried. Most rubbers I’ve tried feel only slightly different from one another. This rubber was a complete change, taking me about 2-3 weeks of practice to feel at home with it (very fast with good control). However, after working with it, it has improved my overall game, and it would take a lot for me to try and switch to any other rubber. It’s great for serving, blocking, looping close and off the table, and my smash is awesome now. Not so good for off-table chopping.

#59 — June 2010

I switched to the Tenergy 64 from Tenergy 05 on my backhand to get more speed, and it definitely delivered. The 64 is much faster than the 05 with a slightly lower throw. Spin seems the same as the 05 as far as I can tell.

#60 — May 2010

For offensive players looking for a strong spin and control from mid-distance, this table tennis rubber is an excellent choice. It’s considered one of the best BTY rubbers for offensive players with varied styles.

#61 — March 2010

Good for blocking and flat hitting, as well as looping.

#62 — March 2010

Ok, my playing style is modern defensive. I’ve been playing for about a year.

I originally tried this in 1.9 on a Butterfly Defence II. Simply put, it was too fast for me. I just could not control it. Forehand chops would launch long. Forehand loops would be long. Pushes would be long or too high.

3 months later, I returned to tenergy 64.

I’ve now got it in 1.7 on a Matsusheta Pro, and it’s perfect. Speed and Spin are excellent. Forehand chops are pretty good. Mid-distance looping is so easy, even with a defensive blade. The spin on serves is excellent. Blocking is a breeze. I still launch a few shots long on occasion, but I just need more time to get used to the rubber.

I feel like this rubber can do everything.

Definitely worth the money.

#63 — March 2010

Amazing rubber up close to the table, but for me, I found that it wasn’t as good as the Tenergy 05 for away-from-the-table loops. However, it offers incredible speed and great spin. My setup is Tenergy 64 FH Bryce Speed FX BH and Timo Boll Spirit ST.

#64 — February 2010

It has a nice feel to it. Great speed, spin, and control for such a fast rubber. I prefer Tenergy 05, but if you want more dwell time and a little bit more controllable game, choose this one instead. I like it on a Stiga Clipper or Donic Lagonda blade.

#65 — January 2010

This rubber is a very powerful weapon if you understand how to use it.

At first, I had trouble looping, especially when my opponent gave me a short service. When I lifted it a bit, the ball flew away from the table! :(

However, when I played driving, the ball always returned to my opponent’s table and it drove very fast! Blocks are also fast with a punching move.

I tend to break a ball easily with this rubber as I keep hitting the ball like a mad man LOL. All in all, it’s a very powerful and very fast rubber.

#66 — January 2010

Very good Tenergy rubber indeed. Again, we are facing a soft surface that requires skillful hands to cut it off. There are too many useful reviews about this rubber, so I will pass this one on.

#67 — January 2010

I used to play BryceFX as my forehand rubber. However, I decided to try T64. Initially, I was surprised by its power and speed. I enjoyed using it, but it behaved differently from my Bryce rubber, which I used to speedglue for enhanced performance.

When I first tried the T64, I became hesitant to use speedglue again due to its fast speed when combined with my Gergely Blade. I feared that using speedglue would make it too difficult to control.

However, I am thrilled to report that the T64’s consistency and throw are exceptional. I was amazed at my ability to spin drives, even from below the table. In my opinion, it is one of the best and most worthwhile rubbers I have ever used.

#68 — November 2009

I use it on many blades (JM ZLC, Timo Boll ALC, Maze ALC, and Hinoki Senkoh 90). I like the Hinoki feel best with this rubber.

#69 — October 2009

Excellent rubber. I used Tenergy 05 on my backhand, but the throw angle was too high for me, so I chose Bryce Speed FX.

However, this rubber wasn’t able to do high arc loops. So I decided to take the Tenergy 64. It is slightly faster than 05, has the same control, and a slightly softer feel but a lower throw angle.

Now my loops are the best. On second distance play, I have full control of my rubber and blade. The short-game is also amazing.

If you think Tenergy 05’s throw angle is too high, go for Tenergy 64. It helps a lot for getting a better backhand loop.

#70 — September 2009

Ultimately, this is a rubber for professionals. Beginners beware! Otherwise, you may wish you had never heard the name table tennis.

#71 — September 2009

This is undoubtedly Butterfly’s best rubber to date. It’s not quite speed glue effect, but it’s as close as it gets.

I use it on a Maze Off blade, which is pretty quick, and I use it both sides in max. I love it. It does just about everything really well, from service to on the table or mid-distance game with heavy spin and lots of speed due to the spring sponge. This can make net play a little tricky, but with soft hands and a good touch, you soon get used to it.

On the downside, there are two issues:

(i) If you play in humid or poorly ventilated facilities, the rubber seems to “sweat,” and the ball just drops off the bat when you try to loop with it. Having said that, I just flat hit and block with it, and again, the rubber performs superbly well.

(ii) Because I tend to do heavily chopped service returns close to the table, I sometimes catch the rubber on the table surface. This has caused the rubber to perish rather quickly for my style of game. However, the middle of my bat has remained consistent for over two months now, so wear and tear for this rubber is great. At a cost of £40+, it initially sounds like a lot, but the rubber does last much longer. I play about 8-10 hours per week.

#72 — September 2009

For me, it is the perfect forehand rubber. The throw is high, making it easy to lift chop balls. Nevertheless, it is very easy to block (here the throw is medium) and it is great to counterloop.

The speed and especially the catapult are outstanding! Serving and returning is great, but here it is slightly beaten by the 05.

#73 — April 2009

Well, I finally played with the Butterfly Tenergy 64 rubber and I must say it is faster than the 05. It is a very good rubber for mid-distance players indeed. It has a softer sponge than the 05 but still not very soft.

If you play close to the table, it is very easy to block with but because of the speed, it is less easy to hit with. Opening and looping are good near the table but make sure you go for the ball. I found that near the table, you can generate more spin with the 05 and further away with the 64. However, the 64 still had more spin near the table than other rubbers. Control was okay to very good.

I think Butterfly is right. It depends on your style which one you have to choose. The 64 is for further away or if you have small strokes for looping at the table. The 05 is made for at the table because it gives you more time to react. Of course, if you are a very fast player who can handle the speed with good technique, the 64 is playable near the table too.

#74 — February 2009

Behaves in a very similar manner to Tenergy 05, but with a slightly softer feel overall. The sponge is the same as T05, so the difference comes from the pip configuration in the topsheet.

Like T05, it is heavy and expensive. The topsheet looks a bit more fragile, but it has been fine for me so far. It is still a spin and loop monster, with quick pace and high throw.

Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.