Tibhar Evolution FX-P
Submit a Review
Reviews
#1 — May 2025
Good enough for a professional player.
#2 — December 2024
It is a good rubber and I am adjusting it to my style.
#3 — October 2024
High quality, but too fast for my taste.
#4 — August 2024
I’m an older player who doesn’t have the fast twitch muscles to play with hard sponges. I use 1.9mm and there is plenty of spin for serves and controlled loops.
#5 — July 2024
If you enjoy looping and heavy spins, this is one of the best rubbers in my experience. Somehow it is not so popular beside faster and a bit spinner MX-P version, but this rubber can do so many things better regarding all-round style.
My impression is that the rubber itself is much more forgiving than competitors, and it was on my main racket for a long time. Still, I like to play with it against all-around or defensive players, combined with Tibhar Aurus on FH.
#6 — May 2024
Works very well for me. Good speed and spin as well.
#7 — May 2023
I love my rubbers as they can absorb a bullet shot from an opponent and create super speed when needed!
I use these on a very slow blade and will certainly order them again.
They do smell for the first 2-3 weeks of use and need 2-3 layers of glue when bonding them to a blade.
#8 — May 2023
I’ve never been able to use the harder sponge rubbers because I don’t have a very fast swing speed. I depend more on control and spin. This rubber suits my physical abilities very well.
#9 — April 2023
I’m not a pro, but I feel like my skill level has grown exponentially. Really high speed and control.
#10 — March 2023
Nice soft feeling rubber with good grip. I put it on my backhand with medium throw and it works well with my technique.
#11 — February 2023
I tested RITC 729 Friendship on a few blades I have. Only on the Stiga AC blade was it decent. Unfortunately, it is rather heavy, which completely disqualifies it for me. Head heavy rackets prevent good control.
When I put it on my backhand on the Yasaka SE it was just plain awful. It is mushy and made the racket heavy and unpleasant to play with. Topspins were also a tragedy. On the Tibhar IV-L blade it was just so slow and mushy.
The throw angle is very much dependent on how hard you hit with it. As I mentioned, it was fine on a flexxy blade like Stiga AC, but on stiffer ones it was an absolute tragedy. Still, it is too heavy to recommend.
#12 — January 2023
Excellent product and superb performance.
#13 — September 2022
I received the product within 3 days of order placement, despite international shipment. The packaging was excellent, and the product was received in perfect condition. Thank you.
#14 — September 2022
It is much slower than MX-P.
#15 — August 2022
FX-P has a good balance of speed and control. Excellent for blocking and pushing.
#16 — July 2022
I use this one on my BH, and the price is really good compared to Tenergy 05. Tenergy 05 is better, but my BH drive is good and the block is good. Price-wise, I prefer FX-P over Tenergy 05.
#17 — June 2022
Used by Paul Drinkhall himself.
#18 — January 2022
Paired with Carbonado 145 and Xiom Zetro Quad, adequate control, grippy, very good for controlled looping with beautiful consistency. Good in the service department but need to adjust technique to get more underspin on serves - quite bouncy rubbers. Performs better with Zetro (backhand) I reckon.
#19 — December 2021
I really enjoyed playing with this rubber on the backhand - firmness, good rotation, and handling.
#20 — August 2021
Es un hule muy suave. He probado otros hules suaves (Rakza Soft 7), pero la diferencia es que en este hule, a mi parecer, tienes que tener bastante fuerza para poder hundir la bola en el hule y sacar su potencial (porque imprime mucho spin a la bola). En el Rakza se hunde bastante fácil la bola, pero en este tienes que tener fuerza para lograrlo. Para bloquear es excelente, tiene muchísimo control. Los tiros salen bien, potentes, rápidos y con buen spin. Los uso con una madera Victas ZX Gear Fiber.
#21 — June 2021
Excellent control and easy to impart spin on the ball.
#22 — May 2021
Just a cheap copy of Butterfly rubbers. Don’t even try it. After one month, no spin is possible. The topsheet is really bad stuff. Try some other brands if you don’t want to be disappointed!
#23 — February 2021
The rubbers on my backhand and forehand give me excellent block control and really good power for forehand looping. The spin is very good; perhaps Tenergy 64FX has been my best experience with spin, speed, and control; however, this is a great price substitute and has certainly brought control back to my game. I am now settled with this and have preferred it much more than the slightly erratic MX-P. The rubber is not suited for playing far back from the table and takes time to understand how to counter loop from a distance.
#24 — February 2021
A soft rubber with perfect control and high spin, this is my second purchase of this rubber with Timo Boll ALC and R47 with this FX-P - what a perfect combination. 5-star rating.
#25 — October 2020
Do not use a soft and light blade (balsa inner ply) with this rubber, as this will result in a lack of power when playing at mid distance from the table. Otherwise, the rubber provides good control in all situations. The durability is not great. After six months of use (two times per week), the speed has decreased and the rubber surface has worn down.
#26 — August 2020
The FX is the best in the series, with speed, control, and spin.
#27 — May 2020
Great rubber, what more can I say? The best of the Evolution series. 5 stars and a 10.
#28 — May 2020
Good speed control rubber. Very controllable and fun to play with. Applied the rubber (MAX) on both sides of my Donic Waldner WC89 blade and the feeling is great. Ball placement and blocking are easy. It offers speed acceleration as needed. NICE RUBBER.
#29 — April 2020
Review:
The speed of this rubber is excellent, yet it maintains remarkable control. The weight is optimal, making handling effortless. Ball placement and blocking are intuitive, thanks to its exceptional grip.
When paired with the Gambler Fire Dragon Hinoki blade (maximum thickness), this rubber demonstrates exceptional performance. It’s important to note that the blade’s speed influences the rubber’s overall speed.
This outstanding rubber offers superb control and responsiveness, adapting seamlessly to your playing style. For optimal results, apply Butterfly Free Chack II glue (in my opinion, the finest one-layer adhesive available) to both the blade and the sponge in thin layers.
Additional Notes:
While I’ve used various high-quality blades, the Gambler Fire Dragon Hinoki FL surprised me with its exceptional craftsmanship and aesthetics. This rubber also performs admirably on the Butterfly Garaydia ZLC and the Donic Ovtcharov Carbospeed blades.
Overall, this rubber is highly recommended (IMO).
#30 — April 2020
This rubber ranks right up there with Bluestorm Z3 and Tenery 05-FX. All are quality playing rubbers. Can’t go wrong with either one of them. My choice is Z3 but all of them work well for me. Fast speed with exceptional control with the Waldner Legend Carbon or Ovtcharov Carbospeed blades. As always, Tabletennis11 provides quality products at affordable prices and surprising discounts. Very professional team.
#31 — January 2020
Одна из моих любимых накладок на бэкхенд, мягкая, с хорошим контролем и цепким топ-шитом.
#32 — December 2019
Спасибо, сервис и цена T11 на высоте.
#33 — October 2019
I only play to keep my “hand in,” and it works for me.
#34 — September 2019
Currently using and testing this on a few all-wood blades, including the Tibhar Lebesson blade. I would rate the speed as 8.8.
This is a really nice medium/soft controlled rubber at 40° hardness. It’s slightly on the softer side of medium/soft, with good speed, being between R37 and R42 (say 8.8), or close to Vega Europe.
This has become my new favorite ‘FX’ rubber, with a high enough throw angle for most situations and great control, provided you’re familiar with a bit of Tensor catapult effect. The spin is good on well-struck loops but obviously not as extreme as the ‘S’ versions of the evolution series. It’s similar to Rakza 7 Soft but faster, and feels very slightly harder and dwellier, so to speak.
#35 — April 2019
Extra rubber. Unbelievable feeling with spin in play. Also good for blocking incoming strong strokes and spins. For me, ideal for backhand.
#36 — March 2019
The Tibhar Evolution series is wonderful. In fact, I’m using Tibhar Evolution FX on my Stiga Carbonado 190 for both backhand and forehand. Everything is perfect. It is giving me accurate speed, precise control, and maximum spin with an extra unique sound never heard before. This rubber is just like Tenergy 80 FX but with a good price. For any player who is looking for a replacement for Tenergy 80 FX, here’s one.
#37 — January 2019
Soft and controllable rubbers, often used on the left side.
#38 — January 2019
This is a rubber with high speed recommended for offensive players only. It is ideal for the FH with a combination of my S3 and Nittaku Septear blade. I love it! Perfect assembly by TT11. Thanks!
#39 — December 2018
Отличная накладка как для начинающего, так и для продвинутого любителя.
#40 — December 2018
Good control, spinny rubber. Perfect for all-round and/or offensive playstyles.
#41 — December 2018
Good soft rubbers at an excellent price. The quality-price ratio is high. Play well for both advanced amateurs and professionals.
#42 — September 2018
Excellent control rubber.
#43 — June 2018
Outstanding soft rubber. I used it on forehand and backhand, and it will not disappoint me. It seems like it has no speed because its control is outrageous, but with enough energy, aggressive strokes are quite fast. It is very good for serves despite not being a tacky rubber. Blocking is very easy, and countering spin is not bad at all. I truly recommend it as a very complete rubber, perfect for backhand.
#44 — April 2018
Review text:
Накладка отличная! И дешевле, чем у нас. Спасибо магазину!
#45 — January 2018
Excellent all-around offensive rubber; it can be very fast or very controlled. Great backhand rubber. Similar to Tenergy in terms of feeling, but slower.
#46 — November 2017
It’s the third time I’ve used this product. I am completely satisfied. I combine it with a Timo Boll ALC. I put 1.9 on the backhand and 2.1 on the forehand. The feel of the hits from both near and far distances is amazing. Very good for blocking and directing the ball as I want!
#47 — September 2017
Una goma espectacular con un sonido agradable al golpear un contra topspin.
Es rápida, quizás no más que la MXP, pero con un poco más de efecto.
Posee una buena durabilidad.
#48 — May 2017
Trying this out (2.1-2.2) in place of Tenergy FX on my Timo Boll ALC blade. Much better control on my block and easier to vary my spin both on service and in play. Overall, a real improvement.
#49 — March 2017
These rubbers are great for players looking to improve their game. The rubber grips the ball well and provides good control. It also gives a good amount of spin, making it easier to surprise your opponent. I would definitely recommend these rubbers to any serious table tennis player.
#50 — March 2017
The racket that I use is the Timo Boll ALC. My rubber was Tibhar 5Q on the backhand and Butterfly 05FX on the forehand. The feeling of playing I have with the new rubbers is something unprecedented. Very good spin, blocking, and with this racket I play a very good game close to the table.
#51 — March 2017
Good rubber.
#52 — February 2017
A very nice, soft, and controllable rubber. It generates good overall spin with wonderful dwell time. A satisfying kind of ‘THOCK’ sound when attacking can be heard screaming out from this rubber. The soft sponge allows for somewhat padded, linear blocking.
On the flipside, it’s not as “BULLET” directed as some other rubbers are in that area. You are sacrificing some speed for ease of use and consistency with FX-P.
It plays similarly to Tenergy 05 FX. There is a noticeable difference between them, so it’s certainly not a replacement rubber. But having said that, if you’re an amateur player with limited table tennis skills, this rubber will suit you fine! It’s absolutely fine and forgiving in all aspects of the game.
Tenergy is kind of like learning to drive in a formula 1 car… FX-P is more like a Honda – not too flashy, but you’ll get from A to B with few errors along the way. And for most people, they may not “like” FX-P as much as Tenergy, yet they’ll likely play better using FX-P!
#53 — December 2016
Among the six Evolution rubbers, the Tibhar Evolution FX-P stands out as the softest and lightest variant, weighing 46 grams when cut to the standard 157 x 150 mm test blade. Despite its designated 40-degree hardness, it exhibits a noticeably firmer feel compared to other rubbers of similar hardness, such as the Gewo nanoFLEX FT40. Interestingly, it is only a gram lighter than the considerably harder-sponged Nittaku Fastarc C-1, Gewo nanoFLEX FT45, and Donic Acuda Blue P1.
For further reading, visit: http://blog.tabletennis11.com/tibhar-evolution-series-table-tennis-rubbers-review
#54 — December 2016
When new, the rubber is very fast. However, after 2-3 months, it shrinks considerably, resulting in a small decrease in speed but an increase in control.
The surface is very slippery. To generate spin, you must engage the sponge and execute fast strokes. This makes it unsuitable for flicks or chopping.
Unlike Tenergy, the edges of this rubber do not disintegrate. I have used the same rubber for 11 months without any cracks on the topsheet.
It is best used on the forehand, provided it is used actively and aggressively to achieve decent speed.
If you are considering replacing Tenergy, consider the EL or MX versions. Remember to cut the rubber larger when gluing due to its shrinkage over time.
#55 — November 2016
Excelente, goma rápida y blanda para utilizar en el lado derecho, en el revés me parece muy rápida. El pedido de tenis de mesa llegó muy pronto, son de confianza.
#56 — November 2016
Goma blanda muy rápida, excelente para el derecho.
#57 — November 2016
Like its performance on spin and speed. It works well with Nittaku Basaltec Outer and Barwell Fleet blade. It began to break from the edge after 3 months.
#58 — November 2016
Used this on BH of 5-ply allwood OFF- blade for several months. The aspects that really stood out with this rubber were the fantastic control, easy to access spin, and great sensation. Easy to block, counter, or open up with wide margin of error. I can take big strokes from close to the table with 100% confidence. Feels similar to 05FX.
Only drawbacks are of course that the top end speed is not very fast, and you’ll reach that peak rather easily. Also, I felt that the liveliness of the rubber quickly degrades. After a month or so the speed seemed to drop off considerably. Takes a bit of effort to get your attacking shots deep onto the table.
#59 — October 2016
When new, it is very fast. After 2-3 months, it shrinks a lot resulting in a small decrease in speed but an increase in control.
The surface is very slippery. You must engage the sponge and use fast strokes to get some spin. Therefore, it is not good for flicks or chopping.
The edges of these rubbers do not disintegrate like Tenergy. Wow, 10 months and not a single crack on the topsheet.
If you want to replace Tenergy, go for the EL or MX versions but beware of shrinkage.
#60 — October 2016
Truly excellent rubber with a great deal of control, outstanding spin, and more than adequate speed. I use it on the backhand, but it is very useful on the forehand as well.
#61 — August 2016
A Controversial Rubber
This rubber has sparked debate among players.
Pros:
- Unbelievable control
- Very good spin
Cons:
- Very strange behavior in blocking
- It takes a lot of time to get used to it
#62 — July 2016
I use the FX-P (1.7mm) rubber on my forehand. The combination of this with Andro Rasant rubber and Appelgren Allplay blade seems to be working well for me. With the FX-P, I am able to play more controlled shots and make good placements. Great rubber.
#63 — July 2016
#64 — May 2016
I like this more than 05.
#65 — April 2016
Es una goma muy buena para el ataque. Es una gran opción para usar si no se puede comprar un Tenergy.
#66 — March 2016
Покупал для друга. Он не жалуется и не хвалит.
#67 — February 2016
Çok kaliteli ve dayanıklı.
#68 — January 2016
These rubbers have really improved my game. They offer a fantastic combination of spin, control, and power. As an intermediate player, I tried using Tenergy 05 but found these rubbers to be much better for my game, cheaper, and longer lasting. Kudos also to TableTennis11 for top quality service and shipping to the UK. I’ll be back.
#69 — January 2016
It has a very good gripping effect for loops and topspins. The top sheet is 1.7mm, which I chose, but the sponge is a little bit thicker. My friend likes it so much that he bought it from me, and I bought Donic Baracuda, which has an even more spinning effect. People who use Baracuda play well with it, but it needs to be on a slightly weighted blade to compensate for the rubber.
#70 — January 2016
A very good backhand-rubber. Too slow for backhand in my opinion, but the loops on my backhand have never been better. It has great control, accuracy and spin. I can loop very well off the table as well. I’ve got max thickness, but a con for me is the blocking aspect of this rubber. When balloon-blocking, I can just never hit the table with this rubber. It bounces so oddly because of the soft sponge, I reckon. Though for controlling drive-blocks close to the table, it’s nice as well. All in all a very good rubber, bar the blocking mid-far distance.
#71 — November 2015
Excellent backhand rubber. Amazing control with really nice spin and speed. Recommended!
#72 — October 2015
Quality is very good and the rubber is worth buying at this price.
#73 — October 2015
Mid to hard rubber. Soft sponge. Great sound.
#74 — July 2015
Thanks, Tabletennis11, for offering quality rubbers at a reasonable price. Very fast shipping and extremely satisfied with the customer service.
#75 — July 2015
Great rubber for backhand. I am using it with Timo Boll ALC. It’s a good looping rubber with strong spin and great control. This rubber is excellent with a carbon blade. The speed is really good.
#76 — June 2015
Muy buena goma, mucho efecto.
#77 — May 2015
This is an excellent rubber for backhand. When played with a TIBHAR Ikarus ALX (OFF-) blade, it performs fantastically.
It offers great control, allowing for precise shot placement. The opennings are sharp and responsive, enabling quick and accurate counterattacks. The rubber’s excellent push capabilities provide stability and control during defensive play.
Overall, this rubber stands out as a reliable and versatile option for backhand play.
#78 — May 2015
Excellent quality and excellent price!
#79 — April 2015
Feel, Control, and Spin
This rubber provides a nice feel, good control, and generates spin without compromising too much speed. On my backhand, backhand loops landed almost perfectly.
Comparison to Tenergry 05-FX
I believe this rubber has a similar feel to the Tenergry 05-FX series but at a significantly lower price point.
#80 — April 2015
Excellent rubber for the backhand. It provides great control due to its soft sponge, good speed, and perfect touch for the Chinese style. Overall, it is a very good rubber.
#81 — December 2014
Soft control rubber, fits well on BTY Timo Boll Spirit. Unlike Sinus Alpha, it is more manageable, as it has a lesser catapult effect, otherwise, it hardly yields anything at all.
#82 — November 2014
The rubber is good.
#83 — October 2014
Lots of spin and control.
I like the soft FX-P version because it helps keep the ball on the rubber longer.
I used to have them on Butterfly Timo Boll Spirit blade and was very happy. However, on my newer Timo Boll ZLF, it feels a bit dull. Maybe a soft blade and soft rubber is not such a good combination, or rumors are right, and one should use the same brand for the blade and rubber. Will probably keep it only on the backhand.
#84 — October 2014
Awesome rubber!
#85 — August 2014
Excellent rubber for a looper who wants control as well as the speed to finish a point. I got it in 2.0mm on my backhand. If you’re moving up from a rubber like Energy x-tra it can take a couple training nights to adjust. This rubber has very good control considering it’s quite fast and the spin is good too. Looping backspin from my backhand is easy and I can really get pace on the ball if I whip my hand a little. Short play at the night is a dream and flicking is easy enough. Blocking is of sound quality and you can go a meter or two back from the table and still play easily. It’s definitely for the modern attacker looking to put some consistency and spin into his game.
#86 — August 2014
Previously playing with Grips and then with Barracuda Big Slam, I find with Evo FX-P a real progression in loops and control.
I have never experienced such play around the table before. The spin is greater than all I have tried before (max), and the speed is quite like Barracuda and greater than Big Slam. I find more angle and spin than ELP.
This has been my preferred rubber for 18 months now. The rubber is still as performant as a new Barracuda after 1 year of use (3 times a week!).
#87 — July 2014
Excellent rubber.
#88 — November 2013
Having used Tenergy 64 on BH for a few years, I was interested to try Evo.
It’s certainly not as quick as 64, close but just lacks that bit of punch that 64 has. I would say it’s as spiny and probably has more control than 64. Whether it’s trying to be a Tenergy clone or not, I dunno, but it’s very similar, all around a nice rubber. FX-P is supposed to be the soft version, but in my opinion, it’s not that soft at all. It’s certainly harder than Nimbus Soft, which I use on my BH.
#89 — October 2013
Fast, spin, loud.
The only problem is that it is not very light, so pen holders who play with a reversed backhand may consider another great option, the 5Q Sound.
#90 — October 2013
Very nice rubber for a drive player!
#91 — September 2013
I use Tibhar Evolution FX-P on my backhand in the 2.1 mm thickness. I previously used Tenergy 05, but I find the FX-P better suits my controlled, spin-oriented, counter-attacking, and finesse style of play.
The FX-P provides superior control, spin, and precision compared to Tenergy. Opening loops, pushes, and blocks are crisp, spin-laden, and precise, allowing for pinpoint placement. It excels at receiving serves and offers exceptional value.
I have not encountered any weaknesses or faults with this rubber. Tibhar has done an outstanding job with the Evolution FX-P. If you have any further questions, feel free to contact me via private message.
#92 — September 2013
Top-quality rubber as usual from Tibhar. I use it on the FH side of a Stratus Power Wood in 2.1-2.2 thickness (max.), black, with X2 Platin Soft Max on the BH. The racket has a perfect weight and balance (my SPW is sanded down by about 3 mm in the head).
For me, it’s the best FH rubber to date. It’s very similar to Bluefire M3. Not sure if it’s because it’s newer and has a slightly thicker sponge than my M3 (2 mm), but I feel that FX-P is a bit harder, faster, and with more catapult.
In mid-distance, it’s more powerful than the M3, but with just as much insane control. Touch is great, and spin is as good as the M3, if not better. Slow when you want it to be, but a rocket when you loop hard. Short game is easy and natural; even chopping is easy.
It’s the perfect rubber for me. We’ll see how it “evolves,” but the first few days’ performance has been absolutely brilliant. You can like it more or less, but there’s no doubt that it’s a top-quality rubber and deserves at least a 9 overall rating. A reviewer on RNL gave it a 3. That’s absurd.
By the way, I had no problem gluing it, using Donic Vario Clean glue.
And at 36 euros, it’s a bargain.
I wonder how the new 5Q Sound compares to it.
#93 — August 2013
This is one of the best rubbers for backhand I have ever tried, a perfect alternative to Tenergy 05-fx! The spin, speed, and control are unbelievable, but only driving and punching are not good because it is a very soft rubber.
#94 — August 2013
This rubber is perfect for backhand, looping, driving, near and far from the table.
#95 — June 2013
Review text:
Very good speed, spin, and touch. I like the throw angle.
My favorite rubber.
#96 — June 2013
What a rubber!
It has great spin, speed, and control. It is also very durable. I have been using it for several months now, and it shows no signs of wear and tear.
I would highly recommend this rubber to anyone looking for a high-quality product that will help them improve their table tennis game.
#97 — March 2013
After using Tenergy 80 for the last few months, I can confidently say that Evolution is just as high quality a rubber. I’m not dissing Tenergy 80; I love it and still use it on my backhand side. However, Evo FX-P does as good a job, just in a different way.
In terms of control and spin, I believe Evo wins. My forehand has significantly more spin and dips onto the table more easily. Generating loops from table height or below off of chops is also much simpler.
Furthermore, I’ve noticed a substantial improvement in the spin on my serves. When switching between the two sides of my paddle, it’s evident which side my serves are more dangerous on.
The most significant advantage of Evo for me is the gears. I feel I have many more options with Evo than with Tenergy. Brushes are slower with more spin, but when you swing freely, you can generate massive pace.
It’s a fantastic rubber with no complaints so far. I’ll update this review as I use it more extensively.
#98 — March 2013
I had great expectations when I purchased the black FX-P in 1.9mm for my FH. My biggest complaint is that I could not glue the sheet flat. I used a good water-based glue and the same procedure I have always used for all rubbers, tensors, and others. To my horror, when applied, the rubber was bumpy, almost like a leather grain effect. I tried regluing it with a similar result.
I sent pictures to Tibhar, and to their credit, they sent me a replacement sheet but said there was nothing wrong with the original. This time, I had someone else glue it and we got the same result. Both of us are experienced in gluing rubbers.
As far as playing with the rubber, the throw angle is a bit lower than I like, and the weight is heavier than the Rakza 7 I normally use by about 6 grams. I will never buy another sheet of the Evolution. I believe that if you want to use an open-cell sponge-backed tensor, you can avoid my experience by using Tenergy or Donic Bluefire.
Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews
༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.

