Xiom Omega V Tour

This is a rubber that you will want to play with. There are rubbers that are faster, cooler, and have more control, but with them you need to hone every movement persistently and for a long time. Examples include the T05 or the T80. In contrast, the Xiom Omega 5 Tour is very friendly. It forgives small mistakes and inaccuracies. The Xiom Omega 5 Tour can work successfully on both the forehand (FH) and backhand (BH). I have tried the Sigma II Pro and Vega Japan, but the Tour has more gears and a better trajectory. In my opinion, it is the most playable rubber. Xiom is great.

Excellent rubber, providing a solid feel with plenty of gears. This rubber possesses one of the highest levels of control I have encountered, especially considering its speed. It executes your commands precisely, even if your technique is imperfect. This review pertains to the Dynamic Friction upgrade version of Tour.

I developed a BIG smile after the first couple of FH topspin rallies. The Omega V Tour has the same direct feeling as the V Asia, but the slightly greater catapult allowed me to play faster shots with the same effort. The Omega V Tour’s throw angle is slightly higher than Omega V Asia’s, resulting in a very pronounced arc over the net and excellent looping consistency. I applaud Xiom for getting the combination of throw and catapult just right with the V Tour.

I have played with other high-throw rubbers but often found their catapult effect to be too strong and/or inconsistent, resulting in many balls going long. Not so with the V Tour.

For a full review, see: http://blog.tabletennis11.com/xiom-omega-v-pro-euro-asia-tour-reviews.

Blade: Yasaka Ma Lin Extra Offensive (MEO)
FH: Xiom Omega V Tour DF (Max-Black)
BH: Butterfly Solcion (1.9-Red)

Disclaimer: This is a review for Xiom Omega V Tour with Dynamic Fission version package. It may have slight or no variation to the normal counterpart.

First Impression:
Wow, cool black sponge! Aside from that, this rubber excels in spin and consistency. I’ve used Donic Acuda Blue P1 and Donic Bluefire JP02, and I can confidently say that this rubber generates more spin than both of them. CONSISTENCY! I find that this rubber never gives me a slip feeling when topspinning the ball. Others have also noted that the spin generated by this rubber is stronger than previous rubbers.

Drawbacks:
Besides the price tag, I find that this rubber in maximum thickness is hard to control during longer rallies. Services, service receives, and opening loops feel great, however. If available, I might switch to 2.0 thickness.

Edit (November 2015):
After testing 2.0 thickness, I believe that if you are a looper, maximum thickness is the only way to go on the FH side. 2.0 thickness decreases spin a bit but compensates with a little more control in rallies.

Edit (October 2016):
After using it for over a year, I’ve realized that this rubber does not pair well with hard blades (at least with the MEO). The throw is high, and the bouncy nature of the rubber combined with the blade’s bounciness makes it difficult to land the ball properly when looping. Additionally, the “middle-hard” rubber hardness is a drawback for my play. I can’t control short pushes or perform slow spinny loops because of the lack of “touch” feel. I might try it again if I ever have the opportunity to use a slower blade (I still like the spin of this rubber).

Quite good for spin. Speed is medium. However, considering durability, this rubber is ordinary. After 30 hours of training, it looks like OIV pro after 2 years. This rubber is only suitable for those who can afford to change it every month if they play 8-10 hours a week.

Xiom Omega V Tour Rubber Review

Initial Impressions

The Xiom Omega V Tour rubber features a grippy topsheet with an impressive catapult effect. While classified as a tensor rubber, it lacks the extreme speed typical of this category. Its characteristics resemble those of Rakza 7 Soft, yet it offers enhanced speed and spin while maintaining exceptional control.

Performance on a Chinese Blade

Despite concerns about using a non-Chinese rubber on a Chinese DHS blade, the Omega V Tour performs remarkably well. It eliminates the jarring vibrations associated with off-center hits, resulting in significantly more consistent strokes. This improvement is attributed to the rubber’s ability to compensates for the blade’s limitations.

Versatility and Effectiveness

The Omega V Tour provides exceptional control at various distances, including short, mid, and long-range. Its low and fast ball trajectory enables effortless net clearance. Blocking is effective with a slight stroking motion, but the rubber is not recommended for blockers who rely primarily on this technique. Pushing and flipping shots are also reliable.

Subsequent Updates

After switching to Rakza 7 for her forehand, the reviewer moved the Omega V Tour to her backhand. It has proven to be an exceptional backhand rubber, allowing for effortless low ball blocking and highly spinny topspin shots that clear the net with ease. However, counter topspin and heavy topspin blocking may lack some control due to the tensor’s springiness. Chops, pushes, and serves remain consistent and effective.

Recommended for Players

This rubber is not suitable for players with weak backhands due to its low throw angle and difficulty with passive blocking. It is an offensive/attack rubber that prioritizes control and spin over speed. Its performance is compatible with plastic balls.

This is one of the newest rubbers from Xiom and is good for the new plastic balls. It offers excellent speed and spin, as well as good control compared to the Sigma II and Omega IV Europe series.

I personally preferred it over the Butterfly Tenergy 05 and 64 FX. However, with the new stocks, it has become rather expensive.

Nonetheless, it’s worth a try and I believe you’ll enjoy it!

Speed: More than good.

Spin: More than enough.

Control: More than your ability. Will significantly improve your control regardless of blade used, whether forehand or backhand.

Negative: Weight. May be heavy for some. However, its heavy weight will be forgotten once you experience its exceptional control.

Max Sponge:

• Excellent control and spin
• Impressive “pause button” effect

2.0mm Sponge:

• Less speed than max sponge
• Greater precision
• Notable topspin capabilities

Overall:

• Effective for close-to-table play
• Great combination with Xiom Stradivarious

Very good rubber. The sponge is hard, but the top sheet is soft and flexible, so it provides a good grip and pure control. This rubber has a nice feel and is also very fast. I use 2.2 on my blade. It is 52 grams, so it is heavy. Uncut, it weighs 73 grams. I recommend it for people with good experience.

Not enough information is provided to perform the requested actions.

The Tour version is just about to be widely released in the UK. A friend/agent gave me an early release. This was my first time trying Xiom, and I am very impressed.

It offers superb control despite the high speed and spin. I have always played with Max rubbers, so I was doubly surprised to find the 2mm sponge version did everything I could wish for in my loop game.

P.S. I am equally impressed by the quality of reviews from everyone in this Database. Keep up the good work…

Definitely a very grippy rubber! I got 2.0mm on a fast 7-ply wood blade FH, super steady and spiny. I did not pay a lot of attention to the rating of control, but my counter loop is really better than before when I play with the same form! I do not know if it is because of the great top sheet or the sponge. I just did it.

I love it! And I will use this one as my FH rubber, replacing Omega IV Pro max (2.0mm will be better though).

Power is good enough, surely better than “OK”; Speed is the same as the power rating.

The weight is OK; 2.0mm on a shakehand blade is 44g. That is why I gave it a 9.9 overall rating. It would be a 10.0 if it was 40g.

Nice job by XIOM!

The rubber is not grippy, which makes it a poor choice for all-around play. It may be suitable for backhand play, but its lack of grip limits its versatility.

Using on FH Max on Tibhar Stratus Powerwood. Switched to this after using IV Pro for the last 3 years. A worthy upgrade.

Very balanced, good for heavy loop, very good spin, the highest spin of any Xiom Rubber and as rated by Xiom. Very slightly harder than V Pro, bit more speed.

Bit Softer and slower than IV Pro, higher throw which makes more loops possible. IV Pro has a bit more power at the top end but this more than makes up for it with more gears for great controlled attack, massive spin, great for short game, can even chop well with it on my FH, something that was very difficult with IV Pro.

Overall along with V Pro on BH, it’s a great rubber for all-around aggressive play with enough power when needed.

I use this rubber now on both sides, and it works very well.

I have only used it on one blade, so I am not yet able to provide numeric ratings.

At the moment, the Throw angle value average of other evaluators (4.7) is much lower than I would estimate. I would evaluate the speed to 8.5. Other values are quite near to my estimates at the moment.

The best forehand rubber for me is one that offers both speed and control.

Review

Another masterpiece from Xiom.

Xiom rubbers consistently showcase exceptional quality and packaging. The Omega Tour is no exception, boasting the hallmark Xiom packaging and a top sheet with a lustrous sheen.

Spin

Surprisingly, I find the spin production to be understated when initially hitting the ball. However, once it bounces, the massive spin becomes strikingly evident. The trajectory of the ball also reveals the significant spin imparted. Whether due to my technique or other factors, rallies tend to extend, showcasing the remarkable spin potential. It poses a formidable challenge for inexperienced players to block or counter opening loops, often resulting in overshot blocks.

Speed

Omega Tour exhibits a slightly greater speed than Sigma 2 Euro. It offers a controlled bounce without excessive bounciness. The trajectory is remarkably long, inducing a sense of anticipation. Nevertheless, the substantial spin compensates, ensuring the ball lands near the table’s edge consistently. Comparable to Calibra or T64, this rubber boasts one of the most extended trajectories encountered.

Other (Angle, Tack, Hardness…)

I disagree with the medium throw angle rating; it leans more towards medium-high on the spectrum. The rubber exhibits no tackiness whatsoever, providing 100% grip. The overall hardness of the sponge and top sheet feels medium-hard, slightly firmer than Sigma 2 E. While tensors possess an inherent mushy feel, Omega Tour’s is more subdued than Vega Euro or T64 FX. Despite Xiom’s rating, I find control to be relatively easy with this rubber. The long trajectory is the only control concern, but the ball consistently lands within the playing surface, alleviating any significant issues.

Recommendation

Highly recommended for all levels of play.

Best regards and enjoy!

First impressions: I tend to use medium-soft rubbers, but I couldn’t resist the temptation of Omega Tour V. Perhaps I got too used to the medium-soft M3, so I found OT V a bit hard and slow for my taste. I’m sure that advanced players with proper strength and speed will enjoy it.

Control is great, pushes are smooth and low. The spin is average, but that’s my shortcoming. Counterhits and loops are nice, but again, I’m not fast and strong enough to be as effective as I am with my previous FH rubber. I’m convinced that some time is needed to “break it in”. On the spur of the moment, I decided to use a “bucket of booster” to make it softer.

Wait and see.
To be continued…

The best Xiom rubber in terms of grip is the OmegaV Tour. I test rubbers by giving sidespin to the ball and letting it drop to the racket, which is held at a 90° angle to the ground. When the ball makes contact with the rubber, I can see how well it grips the ball and throws it back into the air using the ball’s spin. The OmegaV Tour is one of the grippiest rubbers, along with the Tenergy05. The OmegaV is significantly better than the old Vega/Omega-Series, with the Vega Japan being close to the OmegaV. I have yet to test the Sigma II Euro/Pro.

Considering the hardness of the sponge, it is acceptable. It is harder than Xiom’s “Elite” versions, which produce a superb sound, but not as hard as Chinese sponges. In my opinion, it is one of the best rubbers on the market, on par with the Tenergy05, but not nearly as expensive. Get it, and you won’t be disappointed!