Tibhar Evolution MX-S

This is the first time I have played with a brand other than Andro Rasanter. I have played with R47, R42, and R37, but I wanted something with less bounce/catapult and a lower throw angle. The Special R47 was too hot for me to handle. I play close to the table or just a bit away as I play aggressively with LP.

When I first played with the MX-S, it felt very different. It felt like the rubber grips the ball when you hit it, which is a good feeling. I could control where the ball went in slow play and when spinning.

I don’t use very long attacking strokes as I play close to the table and need to recover back in time. I have problems with high arc rubbers or very bouncy/catapult ones. This one seems perfect. It might not be as fast, but it is fast enough for me.

The complete bat was 2 grams heavier (134g) than with FS Battle II (132g). I can’t say much about durability yet.

This rubber is phenomenal! It offers unbridled power and speed but almost deliberate control on every shot. It is almost immune from oncoming spin, and the output is directly proportionate to the player’s input. Loops, pushes, blocks, flicks, topspin, service game… it’s all there with MX-S!

Power, spin, and a low flight ball are all what I need for my forehand attacking looper style. I use it on the Tibhar Force Pro Samsonov Black Edition blade.

This rubber is very similar to the MX-P. It offers a little bit less speed but a little bit more spin. It’s great for forehand topspin because it’s very fast but still has extremely high amounts of spin. It’s also very good for serving.

Thickness: 2.0
Blade: Andro Treiber K OFF

Blocking: 10/10

• Very controlled
• Not sensitive to rotation

Topspin: 10/10

• Very good spin
• Ball goes exactly where intended
• Very good power

Serves: 9/10

• Good, but could be better

Distance from the Table:

• Can play close to the table, at half distance, and away from the table
• Great for playing in any zone

Pickup: 9/10

• Forehand flick could be better

Orientation:

• Lining for players with good technique
• If your technique is good and your hits are not “random,” you can use this rubber
• Rubber may seem strange at first, but you will get used to it over time

Recommendation:

• On a slow blade, it may be a bit too slow
• On a fast blade, it is recommended

Great mix for spinny loopers and those who like to counter as well. Serves and receives are excellent. Blocking is effortless, and flipping/opening are simple.

It is exceptional for looping, chopping, and almost everything else, except for two issues:

1. Weight
2. Re-gluing causes it to shrink by about 2 millimeters.

Despite being a very stretched rubber, it remains controlled. While it requires effort to master, the rewards are substantial.

Hello, here is my first review for MX-S rubbers. I got two sheets of them with a maximum 2.1 mm sponge attached to my old Stratus Powerwood blade. Considering that I upgraded from softer rubbers (Andro Rasent BH, DHS Hurricane 8 mid-hard), first of all, after the first hold and first few balls, I found that the blade is really heavier than before. Stratus PW is notorious for head heavy, and also MX-S is one of the heaviest! The whole combo gives good power when playing with good technique and fast full movement. The main problem until now is that I am not finding myself well yet. I don’t have the same control as before for BH. MX-S is not forgiving at all. You should play very good technique to get something from this rubber. Until now I can’t generate that enormous spin that I heard about. The spin I generate is good, almost like the one with DHS or Fastarc G-1, but it is harder to obtain that amount. I didn’t find MX-S as very fast rubber, it is just speed enough when you play good technique. If you play passively, this rubber is almost dead, noting that I am using all-wood 5 plies blade. The best thing so far with this rubber is the serve receive and small touches. It’s so controllable with a good feeling to place the ball in the desired spot while keeping it short. I played for 4 sessions until now. The rubber needs to be cleaned to maintain its grip quality. I think I need to develop my physical skills to fit this rubber more and hope I will decode its secrets with more training sessions. Still not a fan of it, though.

Not a rubber for me. I am too old and not fit enough to handle this kind of rubber. It is very heavy and hard, with the sponge feeling almost as compact as the topsheet. I can’t do spinny serves with it and miss the table most of the time when trying to be offensive close to the table.

However, I really like it from a distance. It becomes very powerful and spinny when hitting hard.

This is more durable, forgiving, and spinner than an MXP. However, if you are looking for good spin and control, MXS should probably be the third option in the $40-$60 range, after Donic Bluefire M3 (which has insane control and spin even for backhand far away from the table) & Razka 7 (similar more durable)… Good BH option.

This rubber stands out with its unique character and performance. It offers great speed and acceleration while maintaining very good control.

When using maximum thickness on a Donic Waldner World Champion '89 Blade, this combination excels in blocking and ball placement. The grippy top sheet provides excellent touch and feel.

The rubber generates impressive spin and power, but requires proper technique to fully utilize its capabilities. Opening up shots becomes effortless, producing spinny curves with precise wrist and arm movements. Flicking is also enhanced.

Overall, this rubber earns a solid 5-star rating and a resounding 10 for its exceptional performance.

The Xiom Vega Pro table tennis rubber is a high-quality rubber that is fun to play with. It uses Max. Speed and Spin, which gives it a great combination of speed and spin. I give it a 10 out of 10 overall.

Excellent rubber with an absurd spin, very good speed, and a wonderful grip on the ball. It’s one of the rubbers that I had the easiest time with spin, both yours and against opponent backspin. The blocking with it is also very good.

Many people have mentioned the MX-S’s high spin values, but I use it for FH smash and powerful counterhits. The MX-S is not very spin-sensitive but creates a nice curve when you hit through the ball with a closed racket angle. It is an easy spin rubber that appreciates powerful FH strokes. When you make a good stroke, the sponge loudly clicks, giving clear feedback.

I played with 1.7 thickness for several years, and it was not slow at all. I switched to 1.9 with the new plastic balls. I play with the Stiga Clipper Wood, but the MX-S plays nicely with all blades I have tried.

It took me 2 days to understand this rubber. It is not for beginners, but once you get the hang of it, it will be one of the best out there. You need to develop a technique/stroke to be able to optimize this “unicorn”. It is on the same level with T05 and better than Acuda and Yasaka.

I use this rubber as forehand on my Yasaka Reinforce LT (with Rakza 9 on my BH). I was so disappointed on the first day I used it, but I did not give up and continued playing with it until I figured it out. This rubber is very explosive!

Bought this the same day I saw it. The wait seemed very long.

Having played all Evolution rubbers except FX-P, with Rasant and Rasant grip as my favorites, this was way beyond what I was expecting. It is exactly (and I REALLY mean this) a mix of Tenergy 05 and Fastarc G1! And since they are my favorite rubbers, this was a blast.

Speed is just exactly how I want it, and as I am an offensive spin-attacking player that likes to take a step back from the table, I adore this. I think it leans towards spin rather than speed, but I don’t mean slow. Far from slow. Just behind MX-P.

The rubber shines like a tailored costume. Having played with it about 20 times now, I can’t see a better rubber anywhere, and I have tested 130 rubbers. The hard, low sidespin a step back from the table that almost no one has taken is a dream. A dream that comes often.

Tibhar Evolution MX-S

I have been using this rubber with max thickness in black on my forehand side, mounted on a Tibhar Drinkhall Defense Classic blade.

Offensive Performance:

• High topspin levels when lifting backspin balls, requiring good technique.
• Significant spin imparted on brushed topspin shots, making them difficult for opponents to control.
• Adequate speed for forehand loops and side spin loops, with excellent spin and kick.
• Fast and accurate flatter topspin shots, providing pace and precision with less spin.
• Consistent counter topspin shots with a short swing and firm topspin stroke.

Defensive Performance:

• Control is good with a medium to medium-high throw, allowing for direct fast blocks and controlled slower blocks to absorb incoming pace.
• Pushing is effective with good control, enabling various push variations.

Serving:

• Excellent spin potential for all serves, enhancing deception and unpredictability.

Overall:

This rubber provides a balanced combination of offense and defense, making it a versatile choice for table tennis players of various skill levels.

If you are looking for the ultimate all-around rubber for the modern game with the plastic ball, this is the one. You get all the benefits of the modern tensor and the short game of an old-school rubber. It’s a harder and better MX-P. T05 is still a better rubber for looping, but the MX-S is more all-around and easier to play.

Glued on a Stiga OC, it’s a spin monster. Blocks are crispy, chops are easy to do, and the speed is a bit faster than a T05. No rubber is perfect, but this one comes close to perfection.

Very good backhand (BH) rubber. Very forgiving, and if you have a good technique, you will love it. The throw angle is a bit higher compared to MX-P, but the catapult effect is non-existent. The rubber does what you want it to do.

My forehand rubber on my Stiga Clipper CR WRB is one of the top ten rubbers of all time. It fits my style perfectly.

It is spinnier than MX-P, but a tad slower. However, the spin is out of this world!

Wow! A rubber that combines the spin of a tacky Chinese rubber with the power of a European rubber made in Germany. You have to try this weird ESN sponge mixed with a super-spinny surface!

The S series of Tibhar Evolution is the most similar to Tenergy so far, offering speed, good spin, consistency, sound, and a pleasant sensation. It has a medium angle, providing excellent topspin capabilities. All strokes are consistent and easy to execute, with a sensation of medium hardness. Compared to the Evo EL-S, it feels slightly softer, possibly due to the upper layer. Overall, it is a very good rubber, closely resembling the performance of Tenergy 80.

Feel soft, low throw, good service, and short game, but not much power in long distance. Good close to the table, less catapult than MX-P. Weight is less than MX-P.

This is my first impression. After 4 hours of training, I reglued it and will try again tomorrow, hoping tomorrow is going better with falko glue-3 lears.

After one week, I feel this is a hard rubber, low, low throw, good very close to the table, brush topspin, Chinese style rubber. You need very good footwork. It’s not forgiving rubber and not for my playing style (I’m not from China). I’m back to my lazy European rubber, sorry China, sorry Ma Long.

I tried MX-S on BH. It’s great for blocking and hitting. Then I tested it with my FH, and it’s really good! It’s very linear, with very little catapult effect. With a good arm, you can really shoot huge topspin. The amount of spin is even better than T05 (which is my actual FH).

The only issue is the weight. I might keep up with this one when I’ll change my T05.

This rubber fits right in the middle between tensor and tacky rubbers. It’s a nice “transition rubber” with tons of spin in serves, flicks, topspin/topspin rallies, etc. You should try it if you like hard and spinny rubbers but lack the strength for a tacky rubber.

Wow! The spin! - njb.

Very heavy, the sheet weighs 73 grams. Comparable rubbers (e.g., Xiom Vega Japan) weigh significantly less. Additionally, the edges of the rubber break after minimal use.

Despite the weight, it is very fast and imparts spin, but control is lacking. It is suitable for forehand play. The price is reasonable, but the weight and inconsistent throw are significant drawbacks.

Yo uso MxS color rojo, grosor máximo, en una cuchilla YeO7 Off+. Cuesta mucho acostumbrarse al control y al efecto. Es una goma dura y pesada. Pero una vez que te acostumbras, tiene un efecto increíble.

I’m so in love with this rubber!

I’ve used this rubber on Xiom Zetro Quad (not so fast Carbon blade) on my forehand for the last 4 months. The sponge-to-topsheet combination is fantastic. The sponge is really hard (more density than MX-P) but has a softer topsheet, so in general, the rubber doesn’t feel hard but medium hard in my opinion, and in play, this has many positives.

Topspin: this is where this rubber is amazing because I feel that I can really decide how much spin or speed I want to generate. If you need speed, the hard sponge is really good, and at the same time, if you need more grip too, the topsheet really helps! The arc is medium/medium-high, and that’s good for a so hard sponge!

Spin: in general, this rubber is very, very spinny, when you topspin and when serve too.

Control: like I said, the softer topsheet helps to make the rubber more easier to play with, so the blocks and service response are easy.

Negative: a bit heavy, on smashes is a bit slower than MX-P, need a good technique!

Conclusion:
My playing style is really top spin/spin oriented, and I need good control for fast blocks. So for me (tried Rasanter R47, T05, Omega V, Bluefire JP01), this is the best forehand rubber I’ve tried. Really high recommended rubber for rotation topsins.

Another on the top 10 list, this spin-elastic monster doesn’t need any presentation. Everything has already been said.

Update with another blade (ALC)

And the result is different: no more issue with FH, the ball is keeping the same curve whatever the arm speed, thus more consistent on this harder wood. Thus, depending on which blade you use, it may be better for FH or BH. Definitely a good rubber in any case.

I am using the MX-P on BH on Stiga Celero

Replacing my long-time favorite on both sides, Vega pro (also reviewed). I will, therefore, try to make a comparison between both:

• MXS feels a little bit harder and is heavier.
• Spin is very similar.
• Throw angle of VP is higher.
• Sensitivity to incoming spin is higher on VP, thus more control on MXS for me on the BH.

Power/speed:

• With smaller arm movements (e.g., BH), the MX-S is faster, but with full power, the VP is much more powerful!!!
• And also more consistent, indeed I have the feeling that the more power I give (full arm), the lowest the throw angle is (with MXS) and my FH topspins were always very close to the net (or in the net…).
• With the VP, the faster I move, the faster the ball is going and always with an identical angle, it is very linear and proportional to arm speed.

In the end, I tried the MXS as a potential replacement of my VP on the FH, but I will only use it on the BH. MXS gives me some benefits: less sensitive to spin and lower throw thus easier for blocks, and I don’t have the fast arm / low throw angle issue with my BH.

When I first played with the MX-S, I absolutely hated it. It was so heavy, and the harder I hit with it, the lower an arc it seemed to produce. However, I’m glad I didn’t take it off of my blade because the second and third time around, I discovered how I could make this rubber shine: serving, heavy, and well-placed topspin drives from close to the table and precisely placed active blocks and pushes. Be warned though, this rubber will do nothing for you if you have bad technique and improper movement. Be committed to the shot, or your opponent will expose this rubber’s weaknesses.

One of the best rubbers ever manufactured for forehand topspin. The spin generated is immense, but one needs to know the right technique. Once you adapt to it, you would not even go for Tenergy. It works very well with the Timo Boll ALC blade. However, you need to reglue it after a while. One must definitely give it a try.

Having returned to the game after a 35-year layoff, these rubbers have really helped me reproduce and improve on what I remember my style of game used to be.

When starting again, I purchased a pre-made Tibhar Power Carbon jobby just to start me off. I found this okay for control, but I found it hard work to generate the speed and spin that I wanted. So the old Volcano++ rubbers were ripped off and replaced with MX-S 2.2 on both sides.

This new setup has given me exactly what I want for my attacking style. I am now able to replicate and actually improve on my backhand and forehand hitting, topspin, and looping. My short ball backhand flick generates an enormous amount of spin to force a long and high return for me to have a go at.

Control on both sides is excellent, allowing me to place loops and topspin shots pretty much where I want them. Most errors are self-inflicted, and I cannot blame the bat for that!

My only slightly negative observation is that short pushes are a little more difficult, but if you push long with good technique, plenty of backspin is generated, or you can play a no-spin ball to make it more awkward for the other player to settle into a pushing game and allowing a more aggressive opening shot from me.

Very happy, and looking forward to growing with this setup.

A good forehand rubber with a nice feel and spin. However, it is a bit heavy.

Have been playing with T05 on FH for a while now (Dornenglanz II 0,5 (homemade) on BH, twiddling).

Decided to give this one a try, but did not have high expectations. How wrong I was.

This rubber is truly great and there is no reason to pay almost double for T05. Transition from T05 was done after a couple of strokes.

I might agree that T05 is a tad better for service, but that’s it. All other aspects are equal if not in favor of MX-S.

By the way, my blade is Stiga Defensive Wood NCT.

This is the best rubber I’ve ever used for the combination of being able to create spin on all of my own shots, while still being able to easily handle spin on opponents’ shots. It has plenty of speed if you crack it good too.

I use it on my Xiom Vega tour blade and since I’ve been using this rubber, I’ve been beating players I could not beat previously. This is the best forehand rubber ever for me.

This rubber is currently the best available. It provides a soft reaction to touch shots, generating consistent speed and spin when power is applied. It is an excellent rubber, and it is difficult to imagine a better option for any attacking player at the moment.

I was having problems with my MX-P. My hits were powerful but mostly very long and hard to control, and I had to be mid-distance at the table to contain them. The push was also uncontrollable for me because of the catapult effect.

In contrast, the MX-S has no catapult effect, which makes pushing controllable and my hits not long, even if it is close to the table. I need to swing to unleash its power. I am currently using this, and my percentage has improved.

Very good forehand rubber. It offers excellent speed, spin, and control. There is not much catapult effect, but you can feel decent support from the medium-hard sponge.

I have tried my MX-S on two different blades, which gave me two different results. When it was on Butterfly Mizutani Jun, the speed and control were like a dream. However, when it was on my JOOLA Bomb Extrem, it felt a little slow, which I am unsure if it is because of the sponge hardness.

Ultimately, it is a great rubber with great spin, speed, and control. It is great for modern games with new balls.

Bardzo dobra guma. Spróbowaliśmy wersji MX-S 1.9-2.0 na FH. Wcześniej był Rasant Grip. Jest szybciej a tyle samo kontroli i rotacji. Póki co rewelacja!

I tried this rubber in 1.9mm on the forehand and 1.7mm on the backhand on a J.O.W Limited Edition blade. It’s beautiful. Try this combination!

Great quality, beautiful red sponge. Spinny, slower than Acuda Blue P2 or Joola Maxxx-P on the short game because of soft topsheet, but as spinny as P2 (as spinny as it gets) and as fast or even faster on flat hits or power loops because of the Red Power (medium hard) Sponge. Great for BH blocking, pushing, looping, and topspins at close to middle distance from the table.

Using max thickness and an off to off+ blade, you could get it to produce awesome, Tenery-competing speed and spin with great consistency far from the table too. Serves can be deadly. Good price also. Vladi Samsonov plays Tibhar MX series on both wings.

However, for lower level club or competition play, I recommend 2.0 thickness on BH using an all+ 5ply wood blade. I used it with Yasaka Sweden Extra and really love the variations and all-roundness of MX-S. Real must try. Also, this is one of the few non-ESN rubbers that really compete with Tenergy at the top levels, and the construction is also more similar to Tenergies than to ESN tensors due to it having more natural rubber on the topsheet, and a really premium quality red sponge (like Tenergy’s).

The MX-S is known for being the hardest version of the EVOLUTION range. It is particularly suitable for players who use a more physical style of play by accelerating their arm and wrist movements. This specific style helps players harness the full potential of the MX-S. While playing at the table or at half distance, the MX-S offers consistent performance.

When using the MX-S for FH drives, it feels responsive and crisp. The rubber has a medium catapult and OFF speed rating, encouraging hard drives from a mid-distance. During forehand loops, the rubber produces a slight clicking sound and excellent feedback, allowing for angled shots with exceptional control.

The throw angle can be characterized as medium. It provides enough arc to clear the net, even against heavy backspin balls. For a comprehensive review, please refer to the following link: http://blog.tabletennis11.com/tibhar-evolution-series-table-tennis-rubbers-review.

Very good grip on the topsheet. Good for first loop, generating fast topspin that descends under the table. I use it on the forehand of a carbon blade, Yasaka Silverline Carbon.

I prefer the MX-S over the MX-P. I don’t notice as much difference in speed, but I do notice that the MX-S has more spin. I’ve been using it on my backhand on a carbon blade.

Have been using it on Xiom Vega Euro blade as a forehand rubber for more than 3 months. Previously, I used a second-hand Tenergy 05. The spin of MX-S is almost the same or higher than 05, speed is lower, and control is higher. As a spin-oriented player, I like it, but when it comes to weight and catapult, it frequently fails and then suddenly you long for 05. However, when you receive a side spin serve, you trust more on MX-S.

Briefly, there is something missing in this rubber compared with 05, which is weight and catapult effect in my opinion. I recommend it to those who have very fast loop, quick feet, and are a spin lover.

A good forehand rubber, but an outstanding backhand rubber. It provides tremendous power and excellent feel, especially when playing away from the table. This rubber excels at lifting backspin. Overall, it’s a versatile rubber that performs well in various situations.

I just shifted to MX-S for my backhand and this rubber is surely worth it. It has good control, speed and spin. The best part about this rubber is its feeling. It has a great feel to it. Blocking and backhand topspin go very smooth. It’s the perfect backhand rubber.

Blade Selection for Table Tennis Rubber

The choice of blade material can significantly impact the performance of a particular table tennis rubber. Different blade characteristics, such as hardness, softness, and springiness, can affect the rubber’s overall behavior.

Hard Blades

Hard blades provide less flexibility and a more direct response. They are suitable for rubbers with a high level of control and spin, as they minimize energy loss due to blade deformation. Examples of hard blades include those made from ALC (Arylate Carbon) or ZLC (Zylon Carbon).

Soft Blades

Soft blades offer more flexibility and dwell time, allowing for more spin and control during play. They are particularly effective with rubbers that prioritize spin and deception. Woodpliers, which are blades made primarily from wood, are known for their soft and flexible characteristics.

Springy Blades

Springy blades provide a balance between hardness and softness. They offer a combination of control and power, making them suitable for a wide range of rubbers. Examples of springy blades include those made from a combination of carbon and wood, such as certain versions of the Stiga Infinity VPS series.

Excellent spin and block. Very good short game. A great rubber for forehand.

Really nice rubber, great with plastic balls. I play on a wood blade and it’s really good. Easy first spin, power topspin or side spins with nice rotation. Passive block is easy, active too. This rubber is for everyone with very good attributes. If you play with plastic balls, buy this rubber.

UPDATE:

After 3 months, the MX-S is ready to be switched for new rubber. I feel a little problem with slow loops. The durability is lower than Rasant Grip, T05, but better than Bluefire JP02 or Xiom OVEU.

I was playing with Donic Blue Fire M1 Turbo in my FH and now with MX-S. The spin and control are amazing. The speed is less than the Blue Fire but still fast.

Very similar to Yasaka Rakza X. Excellent. No complaints.

I have played T05 and T80 for two years, but the MX-S is my new choice. The sponge feels hard, and the topsheet has a lot of grip like the T05, perhaps a little bit more. The quality is great, and the price is reasonable at 34 euros.

The rubber has many gears. It is very spinny, good for blocking, short services are no problem, good for smashing, and awesome for topspin. Topspin on backspin is very easy. This rubber is a very good choice for variable attacking players.

Pros:

• Short game: Excellent control and feel for precise placement and touch shots.
• Spin: Generates high levels of rotation, enabling offensive and defensive spins.
• Speed: Offers a balance of speed and control, allowing for both attacking and defensive shots.
• Counterspin: Effective against opponents’ spin, maintaining control and disrupting their shots.

Cons:

• Weight: Some variants can be relatively heavy, potentially affecting maneuverability and wrist fatigue.

The rubber excels in generating topspin due to its excellent grip. Despite its speed, it offers decent control, making it suitable for forehand attacks.

Moreover, the rubber effectively counters counter-spins and provides stability for straight play within 1-2 meters from the table. In my experience, it is the best rubber I have used, and I highly recommend it for players seeking a versatile and high-performing rubber.

The rubber is almost as fast as T80 and has better spin. However, the speed is slower than T64. This makes it a very good rubber for spinny and fast game. The best thing about this rubber is the heavy cut it produces.

I switched from MX-P to MX-S max on both wings. MX-S sponge is a bit harder, but the topsheet is softer than MX-P. It has less catapult, more spin, and is a bit slower than MX-P.

This rubber provides very good grip and is easier to handle in short-short or serves.

It also generates massive spin for topspins.

I have been using the Tibhar MXS in 1.9 on my backhand (mostly) for around 6 months now. I use it on a Donic True Inner Carbon blade.

This is a fantastic rubber that excels at top spins, drives, flicks, blocks, chop blocks, and even punches. Unsurprisingly, it’s crispier and more direct than the Yasaka Rakza Z (MAX) I use on the forehand.

Banana and strawberry flicks are particularly enjoyable, as well as loops and counters, and blocks/punches. Flat hits, smashes, and short touches are also very good quality, while I find it a little harder to execute classic chops.

The only main drawback I find is its durability, which is okay. After using it for 6 months about 8 hours per week, I can tell the spin has started to reduce, while my Yasaka Rakza Z seems to be more durable.

Overall, it’s an outstanding rubber!