Xiom Zetro Quad

Composite/carbon

47 Reviews

#1 — March 2022

Top. I own two of them, and I feel very lucky to have them. Attackers and spinners dream…

#2 — October 2021

I’ve been playing with the Zetro Quad for the last few months. It excels at topspin and loop drive. The blade provides a high throw angle, so consider pairing it with rubbers that have a lower throw angle. I found it worked well with MXS, but not so much with Rakza X and MXP.

Control and speed are both excellent. The feel is amazing, with thick hinoki wood outer layers. The craftsmanship of the zylon layers with the core is superb, giving it a one-ply feel. I highly recommend this blade.

#3 — May 2020

ZX2 Table Tennis Blade Review

This blade provides an excellent balance of control and power, making it a great choice for intermediate to advanced players. It offers a medium-soft feel, which gives the player a good amount of dwell time on the ball. This results in increased spin and control, allowing for precise placement and greater consistency.

The ZX2 also has a relatively low weight, which makes it easy to maneuver and provides a quick response to incoming shots. Additionally, the blade features a comfortable grip that reduces fatigue during extended play.

Overall, the ZX2 is a well-rounded blade that offers a high level of performance. It is a great option for players who are looking for a blade that can provide both control and power.

#4 — April 2020

Excellent control. It has all the power when you need it. Great for looping and blocking. It’s the spinniest blade I have used after 17 years of playing. It has a great feel that will make you enjoy every loop, block or drive. I have three of them. Thanks, Xiom!.

#5 — August 2019

It’s good to pair with medium to soft rubbers.

#6 — April 2019

Nice blade with good control and reasonable speed. Truly a spin machine!

#7 — October 2018

Perfect topspin blade! Combined with the right rubbers, this is a genuine spin-machine. The best combination I tried for my playing style is with the Tibhar Evolution series. This blade is not so fast; it falls in the middle of an off and off+ speed. However, its control is high for an offensive blade.

I enjoy its touch and can feel a crisp sound. The arc in topspins is medium-high, which helps with controlling them.

Weight: My distributor had 7 Zetroquads, so I weighed them and chose the lightest one, which weighed 85 grams. In my case, this was an ideal weight.

This blade significantly helped me improve the speed and spin of my top spins and my game in general. I appreciate this blade, but it demands good technique.

#8 — May 2018

Looper blade, nice crisp sound and good feeling, makes you confident with full power topspin, still can do good topspin even if it doesn’t good touch the best part of the blade. If you are a looper and you now using off — blade and want to upgrade, this is not a bad choice. H3 forehand and sriver backhand, but I think I can use faster rubber on the backhand side.

#9 — December 2017

This blade stands out for its impressive performance. Having used it consistently for over two years, I can attest to its exceptional feel and lightweight construction.

While the blade may slightly lack speed, it compensates with outstanding control. Additionally, it features a responsive bounce when gripped firmly.

The subtle vibration provides valuable feedback, enhancing the player’s understanding of their stroke. It boasts a generous sweet spot, making it ideal for intermediate players seeking to refine their looping, topspinning, and flicking techniques.

#10 — September 2017

This blade is a looper’s paradise. I tried a couple of combinations with this blade to determine what suits my topspin-laden attacking game best. On my FH, I tried Tibhar MXP, Tenergy 05fx, Rasant Turbo, and R47. In all cases, I could effortlessly topspin with a high degree of speed, spin, and accuracy. The credit for the quality of the game obviously goes to the blade.

On the BH, I struggled adjusting to the stiffness and speed of the blade. I started with my regular long-time BH rubber that I use on all my other blades, Donic BF M2, but it was difficult to loop with it on this blade, so I switched to T05 Fx. However, its spring sponge, resulting in bounce and speed, limited the accuracy of my BH attack. Now, I have a softer Baracuda BS max, and my BH attack is much better.

#11 — August 2017

Mine is a ST handle that is extra wide, weighs 89.2g, and measures 7.25mm thick! The hinoki top layer is pretty thick. This blade is fast but not too fast; just ideal for competition. It produces an enormous amount of spin. Besides the good spin, this blade can produce a wide range of speeds: from slow touch shots to medium-fast loop shots to very fast smashing shots.

Smashes are fast, spinny, and harder to return due to the curvy trajectory. They can be somewhat inconsistent because the graphite kicks in at 2nd gear. The sound pitch and volume change as the graphite layer is kicking in, making a loud popping sound. When I played with other blades before, I tried to hit hard to win the point. But with this blade, I don’t have to hit that hard. I can just try to loop side spin and watch my opponent miss hit. You can slow loop easily and aim for a wide-angle shot with better placement because the ball will dip onto the table. The serves can be short but spinny, as are the pushes. I prefer softer rubber for this blade, like Razka7 Soft.

I am trying to decide which blade to be my main blade: Zetro Quad or Treiber Z. Both are great for all-around offensive strokes and games; the XZQ has more spin, while the Treiber Z has slightly more speed and control. My rating: Speed=9.2; Control=8.8; Sweetspot=large; Stiffness=7; Hardness=6; Feel=med hard; Balance=very good; Spin=9.3; Short Game=very good; Med Game=very good; Short Serve=excellent and spinny; Flicks=very easy; Push/Chop=very good; Throw=med; Flat hit=average; Block=excellent; ST Handle=extra wide; Dwell=good; Loop=very good (grippy & secure); Drive=very good; Overall=9.5.

#12 — May 2017

This blade provides a great feel and touch, allowing for precise shot placement. However, it is crucial to use a rubber with a low throw angle on the backhand side. This will help to ensure that you can keep the ball on the table and control the spin effectively. With this adjustment, you’ll be able to unlock the full potential of this blade and elevate your table tennis game.

#13 — April 2017

An unexpected feeling from a carbon blade. Control, stiff but soft, fast, but controllable. With Vega Elite, I couldn’t find the speed and sound I’m looking for, but the workmanship is great and the blade looks very smart. So I should give it a chance with Vega Pro when I start my regular training program. Dwell time is great. A real spin machine, controllable but powerful. It isn’t a very stiff and hard blade at all, more like wooden.

#14 — August 2016

The Xiom Zero Quad is an exceptional blade. I previously used a Butterfly Gergly and then transitioned to a Xiom Strato, both of which are exceptional blades. However, the Zero Quad is unique in its own right.

Initially, it may appear to lack power, but with a little effort, this can be easily remedied. I use Donic Bluefire M2 on both sides of the Zero Quad. This blade offers exceptional control, and regardless of how hard an opponent topspins the ball, I can effectively return it to the table.

My most formidable opponent uses OX rubber on both sides. He has a confusing playing style, employing both chops and topspins, which can be challenging to counter. I even tried using an Amultart blade, but it proved ineffective. However, the Xiom Zero Quad has been a game-changer. It doesn’t matter what my opponent throws at me; I always have control over the game.

I am not an intermediate player but rather a medium-level player. Despite this, I can compete with intermediate players, who often ask me how I achieve such strong topspins. This blade has the potential to frustrate opponents if you possess the necessary skills.

I also own a Yasaka Malin blade, which provides a similar feel to the Zero Quad. However, I prefer the Zero Quad because I have observed that when I topspin the ball, it travels at a slower pace initially but accelerates rapidly upon hitting the table, making it difficult for opponents to return.

In conclusion, ladies and gentlemen, I highly recommend trying out the Xiom Zero Quad blade. It will undoubtedly enhance your enjoyment of table tennis.

#15 — July 2016

A solid offensive blade. Personally, it lacked comfort for me. It is heavier, with mine weighing 91g. After using it, I realized I prefer lighter blades. The weight felt even heavier due to the handle, which I didn’t find comfortable. It’s on the smaller side and has a rectangular shape, unlike oval-shaped handles. My total paddle weight with Tibhar EL-P max and T05FX 1.9 was 186g (with grip tape), but it felt much heavier and head heavy. Note that some players may prefer this setup. Aside from comfort, this blade is excellent for a power offensive game, particularly strong for topspin play. It’s quite thick, and with the zylon, you won’t get much feel or vibration, but it still performs well in the short game. You do get good power and speed, making it very secure at mid to long distances from the table.

#16 — April 2016

Intrigued by its design and use of Kiso Hinoki/ZLC, I couldn’t resist trying it before buying. Most of my many blades are all-wood Limba, so Hinoki is a new wood to me. I am not disappointed at all. That famous feel is real. The Zetro Quad is precise with excellent feel, soft with good dwell, and light vibrations that in no way affect control. The 7mm thickness gives the blade great blocking and stability. Quickly, the Zetro Quad became one of my trusted blades besides the Clipper and Hybrid Wood NCT.

#17 — November 2015

I like how consistent the reviews are for this blade, and I agree with 95% of the reviewers. My Zetro weighed in at 89g with a 6.9mm thickness. It’s stiff and has a soft/dull feel (little to no vibration). It doesn’t flex much (just a little), but you get enough vibration for a little feedback. It’s not the fastest blade, but it fits my style because I play close to mid-distance.

The dwell on this is amazing with medium/hard rubbers. Andro Powergrip and T05 are good for FH, and I like Donic Bluefire M3 for BH.

#18 — August 2015

Quite stiff as it is pretty thick, but really soft thanks to the hinoki outer ply. This blade is excellent for both looping and countering: you can really make the ball spin a lot thanks to its softness (and, I think, the Zylon underneath the outer ply) and its quite high throw angle, but it’s also really good for blocking.

It’s quite fast (let’s say OFF), but really easy to control over the table, especially in short game. It can “grab” the ball and allow you to drop it right behind the net.

I still need to totally get used to it on my FH, especially for more powerful shots, but it’s a really good OFF blade if you rely a lot on looping.

#19 — July 2015

As a looper, I was searching for more speed with very good control and touch—the impossible, as we all are. The TSP balsas are excellent and gave me almost what I searched for. The 6.5 and 8.5 gave the speed and penetration of shot right for me, while the slightly slower TSP Black balsa 7.0 gave excellent control.

The Xiom Zetro Quad combines the two, perfect for what I was looking for.

Having tried several Xiom blades, I find them well crafted and very high on control and feel. In my experience, they all play slower than most ratings suggest, so aim slightly faster than you think you are looking for.

Other blades tried recently were: - Butterfly Primorac - lovely all-round bat but too slow for me. - Butterfly Michael Maze - way faster than rated here and no control at all! Mad hitter’s blade. - Xiom Vega Pro and Novus - lovely feel and All or All+ speeds.

In addition, I was able to practice yesterday with the Butterfly Boll ALC and the Xiom Stradivarius. The ALC felt a fraction quicker off the blade with a loop, otherwise both were virtually identical in feel and speed to the Zetro Quad.

#20 — April 2015

Using Bluefire M1 and Rakza 7 in 2mm on both sides, this blade is remarkably thick. It excels in looping and blocking, but one notable drawback is its feedback. Transitioning from a slower, all-wood Yasaka Extra blade, I found the feedback from this blade to be considerably duller. However, it becomes more manageable with time.

Update: Pushing with this blade requires refinement, as the angle and power need to be carefully adjusted.

#21 — March 2015

It’s a very consistent blade that performs spins and loops with speed and excellent control. It’s also easy to perform smashes to kill the opponent. It’s a good match combination when paired with P7 Adidas and T80. Overall, this blade is extremely well-liked. It’s one of Xiom’s most well-known blade manufacturers.

#22 — December 2014

At first, I purchased the Xiom Zetro Quad because its aesthetic appeal was irresistible. After two years of using it, my appreciation for this blade has grown immensely, and I am eager to share the reasons why. The Zetro Quad is a carbon blade enhanced with Zylon Carbon. Typically, carbon blades are known for their ability to lighten and expedite the blade. However, this often comes at the cost of reduced feel, dwell time, and control. Intriguingly, the XZQ combines the characteristics of both wood and carbon blades. It exhibits an exceptional wood-like feel and dwell time, enabling an extraordinary level of spin and unmatched control. Simultaneously, it delivers powerful shots and is incredibly lightweight - mine weighed a mere 86g. For a 7mm blade, this weight is commendable. This blade has been hailed as a looper’s paradise, and I wholeheartedly concur! The ZXQ’s harmonious combination of controllable carbon and hinoki layers allows the ball to sink into the wood, resulting in both control and potent shots. I pair it with Xiom Omega IV Europe Max on both sides, which provides excellent control while maintaining sufficient speed for decisive kills. The only drawback I have encountered is the somewhat sharp edges that require sanding. Additionally, the blade is priced on the higher end. However, considering its exceptional qualities, the XZQ is comparable to premium Butterfly blades at a significantly lower cost.

#23 — November 2014

The best blade for looping and relooping ever.

#24 — August 2014

Excellent blade; fast and controllable.

#25 — June 2014

Lovely blade with very good craftsmanship. I’ve been using it for the last 4 months with RASANT (1.9mm) and SIGMA Europe1 (2.0mm). It plays well on slow shots without being too bouncy. Slow, spiny loops are easy to do. Blocking is fantastic. On hard strokes, the second layer of carbon is noticeable and gives a different sound and a second gear, which you need to be aware of.

#26 — April 2014

The Xiom Zetro Quad is a beautifully crafted blade. I can say that in the first day of testing its match speed ALC and has a perfect control. My pairing for this blade was the Xiom Vega Euro 2.0 on BH and Vega Pro 2.0 on FH.

I will play with Xiom for a month and then I will decide if I will stay with Zetro or I will be back to ALC.

#27 — April 2014

This blade was rumored to be a replica of the Innerforce ZLC, but it significantly differs from its counterpart. It exhibits a slight stiffness, making it compatible with softer rubbers and potentially pips if desired. I acquired it for an affordable price of €57 from Celtic Table Tennis, and for that value, it offers exceptional performance. As a consistent blade, it ensures reliability in competitive situations. However, it lacks the captivating qualities of the Innerforce ZLC, which may be attributed to the Hinoki outer plies that I did not fully connect with.

The blade weighs 90 grams, featuring a solid straight handle that provides decent grip. It is sensitive to heavier rubbers, and its balance restricts the thickness of newer generation heavy rubbers or tenergies. Once the combined weight exceeds 182 grams, it becomes noticeably heavier.

Despite these observations, I would still commend the blade for its overall quality, but it falls short of being an exceptional find.

#28 — September 2013

Just one thing: attack without any compromises.

Don’t mind if someone says that it is a loopers only blade; it excels in any offensive stroke. You can even chop with it (of course, 2 or more meters away from the table).

Control in any stroke—this is the strength of this blade.

#29 — May 2013

With XSEI and XSEII, this blade is very spinny. The stroke has to be a little slower to increase dwell time and, therefore, increase spin. It has to have a good brushing technique too. Can also use fast stroke to increase speed with little effect on spin. Ball kicks off upon touching the other side of the table.

#30 — May 2013

This is a great blade. It has a very soft feel. If you play tennis, it has the feel of natural gut strings on a tennis racquet. It is great for smashes and all spins. The only issue I have with it is when I play a fast hitter. If I catch the ball near the end, it feels like the ball is bending the blade and deflecting outside of where I was intending.

#31 — May 2013

This is a power blade with a lot of control and spin. The blade is well-suited for players who want to generate a lot of power while maintaining control over their shots. The blade is also good for players who want to add spin to their shots. Highly recommended.

#32 — April 2013

Excellent build quality. Weighing in at a mere 86g and just 6.7mm thick, it also features a comfortable handle. It’s definitely an off blade.

Comparing it to the Xiom Stradivarius and Xiom V1, all blades were played with Xiom Vega Pro Max on both sides during the same session.

Speed: Stradivarius & Zetron, V1

Spin: Zetron & Stradivarius, V1. It’s hard to separate the Stradivarius and Zetron as both have high spin, but the Zetron might have a touch more spin. You get that slight “dwelly” feeling on big strokes.

Loops: Stradivarius & Zetron, V1. All three blades are monsters when looping, but I found the first two blades more comfortable, with a better feel.

Feel of blade: Zetron - medium soft feel Stradivarius - medium feel V1 - hard feel. All three blades are very flexy on big shots, even the Zetron which is thicker - amazing.

Overall, this is one of the best blades I have ever used. I still can’t decide between the Stradivarius and Zetron as to which one to use as my first choice. All three blades are also good for all other strokes, close or far. Serious defenders might not like it, although I was able to play defensively as well.

#33 — March 2013

This blade is quite unique in that it’s like three different blades built into one. First, it can play like an all-around blade. Kiso-hinoki is a very soft wood that Xiom has incorporated into their top ply. The softness allows for a very controlled over-the-table game.

At the same time, the Zetro Quad can be quite offensive. Xiom has placed two layers of carbon near the center of the blade, which are best known for added speed and stiffness. The carbon is only noticeable during fast rallies and smashing due to its deep placement within the plies. Then comes the Zylon, which gives the blade an Off- feeling when spinning the ball.

Over the table, the Xiom Zetro somehow keeps my serves a little tighter to the net. It might have something to do with the added weight (Zetro weighed 90g). I also noticed that my service returns stayed nice and short, causing problems for my opponent to loop the third ball effectively.

Hitting rallies during warm-up felt exceptionally good. When the ball contacts the rubber, it gives off this pleasant sound and feeling to the hand. The racket was very easy to control.

In looping situations 1-3 feet from the table, I had to come over the top of the ball more than normal to get the ball on the table. This created a very spinny ball with low arc. Then I realized if I’d swing with 60% of my strength, instead of the 80% I’d become accustomed to with other blades, the ball would hit the table with much higher accuracy. I’m not exactly sure how the Zylon aids in spinning the ball, but my usual practice partner was having a difficult time returning my loops.

Looping 5-8 feet or so from the table is where you start to feel the carbon come into play. Other blades, TB ZLF, TB Spirit, Keyshot, they find their limits around this distance. Zetro keeps shining. I was able to loop balls down below my knees from 10+ feet out and have them land in the center of the opponents side using 80% strength. Amazing.

Smashing was fun. The ping sound from the carbon cries out with each smash, interesting to me, I suppose, because I haven’t used carbon in years.

I did some spinless lobbing to set up for the distant loop drives/counter attacks and it was remarkably easy with the Z Quad. And trust me, I suck at being defensive.

Overall, this is my favorite blade as it does so many things well. True, TB ZLF controls the short game and looping but it runs out of steam away from the table. And the ZLC I have lacks control over the table. On top of that, the Quad costs half as much and does it all.

#34 — June 2012

The 4 layers of composites are interesting. This blade is not hard like other carbon blades I have used. It is not fast by carbon standards but has a lot of control. I think this is a well-balanced blade. I would rate this blade between OFF and OFF- as opposed to OFF+. I use Tibhar Grip-S FH and Nittaku Fastarc S-1 BH. Works well with any rubber!

#35 — May 2012

This blade has amazing control and allows the user to generate a ton of spin. It has a ST handle and weighs 92 grams.

#36 — March 2012

I’ve just received my table tennis bat.

The weight is 88 grams (factory value is 85 grams); 170 grams with Vega Europe (2.0 mm) and Omega IV Pro (2.0 mm).

The workmanship is of very good quality, and the first impression is very positive.

I am looking forward to playing with it and comparing it with the Axelo (with Omega IV Pro) that I currently play with.

According to Xiom, the Axelo is OFF++ and is suitable for smash and spin, while the Zetro Quad is specially built for topspin. The Quad is marketed as OFF+.

#37 — March 2012

Baracuda — Baracuda + Zetro Quad = 9 Tenergy 05 — Tngy 05 + Zetro Quad = 8.5 Pi¹ controllo con le Baracuda un po' meno velocità. Meno controllo con le Tngy più velocità. Bel telaio.

#38 — June 2011

As a two-wing looper aspiring to improve flat hitting, I rely heavily on a powerful serve and return to initiate points. Emphasizing spin over speed, I favor a Chinese-style forehand and punchy backhand, complemented by my athletic 6’5" height.

The Xiom Zetro Quad boasts an exceptional build, akin to that of rare instruments like the Stradivarius or Tibhar Stratus Power (TBS). Its core is constructed with carbon and shaved down by a millimeter, topped with a thin layer of Zylon and an extra millimeter of Hinoki, resulting in a solid 7mm thickness. Despite my preference for thinner blades, the Zetro Quad’s reported flexibility drew me in.

Assessing its performance, I found the blade to be remarkably consistent on serves, despite its moderate stiffness. It offers ample control, allowing for precise spin and short serves.

In terms of looping, the Zetro Quad excels in both brush loops and loop drives. The brush loop is largely dependent on the rubber used, but the blade certainly facilitates it. Loop drives, on the other hand, are exceptionally crisp and penetrating, providing a good balance between topspin and speed. While not as explosive off the table as the Stradivarius, it maintains a decent amount of kick. Additionally, the Zetro Quad has enhanced my understanding of table usage for effective looping.

Countering is an area I’ve struggled with in the past, but the Zetro Quad provides an ideal compromise between flat hitting and looping capabilities. Its balance has facilitated my improvement in this regard.

Blocking is a strength of this blade, allowing for effective control and quick reactions. It has enabled me to cover more of the table with blocks, which I attribute both to the blade itself and an improved mental approach.

Pushing is another strong suit, thanks to the soft outer plies. It encourages a more aggressive pushing style, enabling me to generate spin even on short pushes.

Chopping is not a technique I’m proficient in, but that’s a personal limitation rather than a blade deficiency.

Overall, I highly recommend the Xiom Zetro Quad. It falls between OFF and OFF+, slower than the Primorac Carbon but faster than the Viscaria or Maze. Its Hinoki outer plies make it compatible with various rubber types. While not a true OFF+ blade, it suits my playstyle perfectly. I’ve experienced significant improvements in all aspects of my game since using it, without any noticeable shortcomings.

#39 — June 2011

I have had this blade paired with Vega Europe for a couple of weeks now. I find it hard to control.

#40 — April 2011

This is a well-manufactured blade, as you would expect at this price point. Compared to other offensive blades I’ve tried, I particularly notice a more direct feedback from the blade. With other blades, the characteristics of the rubber tend to be more dominant. I prefer the more direct blade feedback, as it gives the bat a more responsive feel. I am using DHS H2 rubbers on both sides. My playing style is offensive near the table/all-round. Looping is very nice with this blade, as it allows for good variation with feelable feedback. In my experience, the blade is not extremely fast, which is just right for me. It seems to deliver a bit extra speed when hitting harder, which may be caused by the carbon layers. (The all-wood offensive blades I tried seemed to have a different characteristic in that respect.) Short game and blocking are also very good in my opinion, and pushing over the table is also very good. I like the blade especially for its solid feel, direct feedback, and good topspin qualities.

#41 — March 2011

Excellent workmanship - the blade is manufactured to the highest quality standards. It is fairly light.

I’ve got Xiom Omega IV Pro 2.0mm on each side. It offers very good control in the short game. Brush looping is easy, and power loops are amazing. There is a lot of dwell time. Blocking and smashing are okay.

There is no way this is an Off+ blade - it is on par with a Timo Boll ALC and slower than Killerspin Diamond TX (and obviously TC). Which in itself is a very good thing!

#42 — February 2011

I used this rubber for only 4 hours and I already have a lot of impressions. First, it is very fast; absolutely only for non-beginners. It can produce a lot of spin, this maybe because of the Hinoki and Zylon mix packed with a Kiri center ply. It is very good for loops, but it is a bit heavy. The bright side of its weight is that it adds speed to your shots, especially if you have a loose grip.

#43 — December 2010

I played with Axelo, Strato, and Zetro, and my favorite is Zetro. It is a very controllable blade with excellent spin and speed. I highly recommend this blade. As for the rubber, I recommend Vega Europe.

#44 — November 2010

Found this blade to be the most consistent blade I’ve ever hit with. It pairs great with both Euro and Chinese rubbers. I pair it with H3 blue sponge and hexer + on the backhand. It is a looper’s dream and good for smashing as well. The soft hinoki paired with the zylon gives it great touch in short games but also great dwell on distance play.

This blade is not as fast as other blades I have played. It is slower than SC by far, slower than MJ, and a little slower than iolite neo. I would say probably just a touch faster than the Acoustic.

#45 — November 2010

This is a spin-generating blade.

Serve: Excellent for serving with high-spin rubbers like Tenergy 05 and Xiom Pro. Even better with medium-spin rubbers for greater precision. My preference is 729-02.

Push: Works best with low-arc rubbers, but still performs well with Tenergy 05. Again, I prefer 729-02.

Flip: More effective with medium-speed spin rubbers. Still good with Xiom Pro, but slightly challenging with T05. My preferred choice is 729-02.

Direct Hits: Optimal performance with long-trajectory rubbers, such as those with medium to low trajectory.

Loop: Extremely easy to loop with. However, it can lack control with Tenergy 05. I have occasionally lost the ball off the table.

Spin: Produces a very high amount of spin, even with medium-spin rubbers such as Sriver G2. I prefer Andro Hexer for this aspect.

Block: Very good, although the ball can sometimes fly off the table when blocking high-spin balls from T05 with T05. My preferred options for blocking are Andro Hexer and 729-02.

Overall: This blade performs well without high-spin rubbers because the ball will rotate excessively. Tacky rubbers are not recommended. It is a blade that can deliver high-performance play without the need for high-performance rubbers like Tenergy 05 or Xiom Pro.

#46 — Long Time Ago...

This blade was groundbreaking, and I understand why Xiom discontinued it since comparable blades are significantly more expensive. It features distinct zylon and carbon plies rather than being interwoven.

#47 — Long Time Ago...

This blade is a literal pain in the butt. The serious problem with it is that it makes your setup more bouncy and spin-sensitive, and by a lot. This can be a pleasant thing for looping and adding spin to serves, but dealing with an opponent’s heavy spin is a nightmare when using ZQ. On an advanced level, using this blade can mean an automatic disadvantage for receiving serves, pushing, countering, or blocking spin-loaded loops. No wonder a former $150 blade was sold for a mere $50 before it was discontinued. I can name at least a dozen other similarly fast blades that are much better in the mentioned fields.

Get Notified of New Equipment and Reviews

༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ No spam or other useless stuff. We plan to send out some newsletters from time to time with the latest reviews and project updates. Feel free to unsubscribe at any time.